Skip to main content

Advertisement

Distal foot segment joint coupling patterns during walking gait

Article metrics

  • 467 Accesses

Background

Several surface based multi-segment foot models have been developed to investigate distal foot function during gait [1, 2]. However, the majority of the models have not defined medial and lateral forefoot or midfoot segments. In addition very little, is currently known regarding the coupling of the distal foot segments [3, 4]. The purpose of the current study, therefore, was to utilize a six foot segment model that includes both medial and lateral forefoot and midfoot segments to quantify the coupling between the distal foot segments during walking gait.

Methods

Ten participants (5 m, 5 f; mean age 22.7 ± 3.3 y) participated in the study. A 10 camera Motion Analysis system was used to capture three-dimensional positions of marker clusters located on the leg and six foot segments of interest (calcaneus, navicular, 1st and 2nd metatarsals, hallux, 4th and 5th metatarsals, cuboid). Following completion of 10 successful walking trials, joint coupling between adjacent segments of interest were investigated using vector coding. Repeated measures ANOVAs with one within-subject variable (stance subphase) were performed for each joint couple of interest to investigate joint coupling between stance subphases. Dependent t-tests were performed to investigate significant omnibus F ratios (α = 0.05).

Results

Significant joint coupling differences were revealed between stance subphases for the: calcaneonavicular complex sagittal plane and rearfoot complex sagittal plane; calcaneocuboid transverse plane and rearfoot complex transverse plane; medial forefoot sagittal plane and calcaneonavicular complex frontal plane; and lateral forefoot sagittal plane and calcaneocuboid frontal plane (Table 1).

Table 1 Coupling angles

Conclusions

These results are clinically relevant due to the fact that a number of previous studies investigating joint coupling have only calculated a single coupling angle between the segments of interest. The single coupling angle has then been assumed to represent the coupling relationship throughout the stance phase. The results of the current study, however, suggest that this assumption may not be valid for all the coupling relationships between the distal foot segments during walking gait.

References

  1. 1.

    Nigg B, Cole G, et al: Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. Journal of Biomechanics. 1993, 26 (8): 909-916. 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90053-H.

  2. 2.

    Williams D, McClay I, et al: Lower extremity kinematics and kinetic differences in runners with high and low arches. J Appl Biomech. 2001, 17: 153-163.

  3. 3.

    Bruening D, Cooney K, Buczek F: Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model. Part I: Model repeatability and kinematic validity. Gait Posture. 2012, 35 (4): 529-34. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.10.363.

  4. 4.

    Rankine L, Long J, et al: Multisegmental foot modeling: a review. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 2008, 36 (2-3): 127-181. 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v36.i2-3.30.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the UW-Milwaukee College of Health Sciences and the Wisconsin Athletic Trainers’ Association.

Author information

Correspondence to Stephen C Cobb.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Keywords

  • Transverse Plane
  • Frontal Plane
  • Stance Phase
  • Camera Motion
  • Repeat Measure ANOVAs