Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical features and outcomes of foot keloids treated using complete surgical excision and full thickness skin grafting followed by corticosteroid injections

Contributed equally
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20136:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-26

Received: 4 April 2013

Accepted: 11 July 2013

Published: 15 July 2013

Abstract

Background

Keloids are often resistant to treatment and have high recurrence rates. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, however, there have been very few case reports related to foot keloids. The purpose of this retrospective case-series was to summarize the baseline characteristics of a cohort of patients, introduce our treatment regimen for the successful treatment of foot keloids.

Methods

Patients were treated with surgical excision followed by full thickness skin grafting combined with postoperative steroid injections combined with silicone gel sheeting over a period of eight years from December 2004 to November 2012 at our institution. Subjective outcome was evaluated using Patient Scar Assessment Scales. The final objective outcome was judged by two independent physicians at the time of 12 months after treatment as recurrence or non-recurrence.

Results

Of 79 patients, 75 (94.9%) were women and 4 (5.1%) were men. The average age was 18 (range 7-43) years. The average pretreatment total size of the lesions was 50 (range 18-150) cm. The number of patients treated for a primary foot keloid was 29 (36.7%), and 70 patients (63.3%) were treated for a recurrent keloid that failed to respond to prior treatments. Prior treatments included single therapies such as surgical excision alone (4 patients, 5.1%), prior steroid injection alone (33 patients, 41.8%), and laser therapy (2 patients, 2.5%). Other therapies included combination treatments (11 patients, 13.9%). Most patients reported improved Patient Scar Assessment Scale by lapse of time. All patients completed the treatment regimen and follow-up of 12 months. Of these patients, 62 patients (78.5%) achieved successful treatment, while the remaining 17 (21.5%) experienced recurrence.

Conclusions

We successfully treated foot keloids using complete surgical excision and full thickness skin grafting followed by four corticosteroid injections (at one month intervals).

Keywords

Keloid Foot Steroid Recurrence

Introduction

The proliferation of normal tissue healing processes results in keloid scarring that enlarges well beyond the original wound margins [1]. Keloids are often resistant to treatment and have high recurrence rates. Numerous treatment methods, including surgical excision, cryotherapy, pressure therapy, intralesional corticosteroid injection, radiation therapy, topical silicone-gel sheeting, and laser treatment, have been adopted for the treatment of keloids, suggesting that no single method has surfaced as the accepted standard. Previously, our group has reported extensive experiences of various locations of keloids [26]. Morbidity associated with involvement of these anatomical locations typically includes pruritus, pain, tenderness, and cosmetic disfigurement. In the present retrospective study, we report on our experiences with foot keloids. Some of the common characteristics of foot keloids are central sparing (Figure 1) and ulceration (Figure 2). They also typically cause secondary infections, contracture, and limited range of motion, which leads to severe functional problems. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, however, there have been few case reports studying this condition [711].
Figure 1

Central sparing in a foot keloid.

Figure 2

Typical ulceration in a foot keloid.

The purpose of this study was to summarize the baseline characteristics of a cohort of patients, introduce our treatment regimen for the successful treatment of foot keloids.

Methods

Inclusion and exclusion criteria and study design

Patients were treated with surgical excision followed by full thickness skin grafting combined with postoperative steroid injections combined with silicone gel sheeting over a period of eight years from December 2004 to November 2012 at Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea. Patients with foot keloids admitted to our institution for surgical therapy were included in the present study based on several criteria: 1) the presence of clinically definite keloid scars on the foot dorsum; 2) scheduled for a complete surgical excision with full thickness skin grafting; 3) the patient can understand and comply with adjuvant corticosteroid injection therapy. Patients were excluded from the study if they were unavailable for follow-up or if histological confirmation was not obtained. All patients consented to a final follow-up visit 12 months after treatment. We analyzed data including patient age, total size, gender, etiology, previous treatment history and modality, recurrence, and clinical photographs.

Surgical technique and postoperative care

All surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia. We excised foot keloids (Figure 3) with 2-3 mm surgical free margins until we noticed moderate dermal bleeding from the surrounding normal tissue. Bleeding was controlled with bipolar coagulation. We then measured the defect size, closed the defect with full thickness skin grafting harvested from the inguinal area. Skin grafts can generally be designed in an elliptical shape, and when harvesting, we tried not to injure the underlying superficial fatty layer. After trimming the fat tissue tangentially to the skin, we approximated the harvested skin to the defect area using silk 2-0 sutures. (Figure 4) We applied a bolster compressive dressing to optimize the revascularization process for approximately 6-7 days. All keloids were sent for histological examination to confirm the clinical diagnosis. The dressings were taken off for the first time 6-7 days after grafting. All patients were seen 10-14 days postoperatively to remove stitches and again approximately 1, 2, and 3 months postoperatively for corticosteroid injections (Figures 5 and 6).
Figure 3

Preoperative appearance of a patient.

Figure 4

Approximation of the harvested full thickness skin to the defect area using silk 2-0 sutures.

Figure 5

Postoperative 2 months.

Figure 6

Postoperative 12 months.

Follow-up and outcome assessment

The follow-up period ranged from 12 months to 17 months. During the follow-up period, outpatient consultations were scheduled every one month for the first 3 months, at bimonthly intervals for the next 4 months, and every 4 months for the remainder of the follow-up period until treatment completion. During the first 3 months postoperatively, we adopted the Patient Scar Assessment Scale from the “Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scales” (POSAS). An assessment of keloids was initially performed at the time of total stitch removal as baseline, and then again at 1, 2, and 3 months postoperatively. During each visit, treated wounds were clinically assessed using the Patient Scar Assessment Scale[12]. The patient scored the characteristics of scar color, pliability, thickness, relief, itching, and pain. All items of the scale were scored numerically on a scale of 1 to 10 with a score of 10 corresponding to the worst possible scar characteristics. The final treatment objective outcome was judged by two independent physicians at the time of 12 months after treatment as recurrence or non-recurrence, with non-recurrence defined as a scar without signs of significant elevation or extension, although slight marginal elevation or redness could be present.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using PASW version 18.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). Our data were not normally distributed, and consequently non-parametric tests were used. Descriptive statistics are presented as medians with ranges or as numbers and percentages. A General linear Model was used to analyze the results of the Patient Scar Assessment Scale. Two-tailed hypothesis tests were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05.

Results

Baseline patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. Of 79 patients, 75 (94.9%) were women and 4 (5.1%) were men. The average age was 18 (range 7-43) years. The average pretreatment total size of the lesions was 50 (range 18-150) cm. The number of patients treated for a primary foot keloid was 29 (36.7%), and 70 patients (63.3%) were treated for a recurrent keloid that failed to respond to prior treatments. These prior treatments included single therapies such as surgical excision alone (4 patients, 5.1%), prior steroid injection alone (33 patients, 41.8%), and laser therapy (2 patients, 2.5%). Other therapies also included combination treatments (11 patients, 13.9%). All patients completed the treatment protocol and the follow-up period of 12 months. Of these patients, 62 patients (78.5%) achieved successful treatment, while the remaining 17 (21.5%) experienced recurrence. The results of the Patient Scar Assessment Scale are summarized in Table 2.
Table 1

Baseline patient characteristics

 

Total patients (n=79)

Age, years

18.00 (7 - 43)

Total size, cm2

50.00 (18 - 150)

Gender:

 

Female, n (%)

75 (94.9%)

Male, n (%)

4 (5.1%)

Previous treatment history:

 

No, n (%)

29 (36.7%)

Yes, n (%)

50 (63.3%)

Surgical excision, n (%)

4 (5.1%)

Steroid injection, n (%)

33 (41.8%)

Laser therapy, n (%)

2 (2.5%)

Combination treatments, n (%)

11 (13.9%)

Etiology:

 

ORIF d/t fracture, n (%)

54 (68.4%)

1’ closure d/t laceration, n (%)

11 (13.9%)

2’ healing following burn, n (%)

10 (1.1%)

Others, n (%)

4 (5.1%)

Recurrence

 

No, n (%)

62 (78.5%)

Yes, n (%)

17 (21.5%)

Values are median(ranges) for continuous variables and number (percentages) for categorical variables.

Table 2

Results of patient scar assessment scale

Patient scar assessment scale

Baseline

Month 1

Month 2

Month 3

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Total score

16.82

4.34

14.09

3.94

13.25

3.89

12.61

3.89

Pain

2.30

1.05

2.15

0.88

2.11

0.85

2.10

0.83

Itchiness

4.09

1.08

3.37

1.04

3.05

0.97

2.92

0.98

Color

3.78

1.53

2.86

1.29

2.66

1.23

2.51

1.18

Stiffness

3.29

1.08

2.72

0.88

2.63

0.87

2.52

0.88

Thickness

3.41

1.04

3.00

1.01

2.78

1.01

2.56

0.98

Irregularity

3.91

1.06

3.32

1.05

3.27

1.03

3.18

0.99

Discussion

Keloids have a tendency to recur after surgical excision at rates as high as 80-100% [13]. Recently, there have been substantial updates on lower extremity wound coverage. This has been possible due to a higher frequency of trauma in the lower extremity than any other areas in the body. As trauma is one of the main factors for keloid formation, the frequency of keloids in the lower extremity is expected to be high. During the past eight years, we have treated lower extremity keloids based on our strict treatment protocol; complete surgical excision followed by full thickness skin grafting and corticosteroid injections combined with silicone gel sheeting. In fact, lower extremity keloids are rarely reported in the medical literature. Thus, we present 79 foot keloid patients with various causal mechanisms who have been treated at our institution in the past eight years.

Various authors reported the onset of KD to be between the ages of 10 and 30 years, and the incidence is not frequent in the first decade of life [14]. Our present work, however, revealed that foot keloids can frequently happen around the age of 10 years and consequently, the average age of foot keloids (18 yrs, range from 7 to 43 yrs) are lower than those of other keloids. (Average age of chest keloids is 32 yrs [5], ear keloids 24 yrs [4], and face:34 yrs [6] ) This is true if considering the high incidence of lower extremity trauma in elderly patients. Although one can think that most lower extremity keloids can be covered by socks or footwear, most foot keloid patients have significant functional problems such as limited range of motion of the ankle or toes and difficulty in wearing normal footwear due to hypertrophied wounds. For these reasons, the surgeon’s fear of recurrence inspite of treatment or young age of the patient cannot be an appropriate excuse for delayed interventions. Rather, the goal of treatment should focus on relieving the patient’s discomfort and functional disabilities.

As defects after excision usually ranges from 3×6 to 10 × 15 cm in size, it cannot be closed primarily (Figure 7). As we usually have 2-3 mm additional surgical free margins, we routinely harvest full thickness skin to completely cover the defect. Spilt thickness skin grafting can increase secondary contracture, while using flaps and neglecting the lower step on the reconstructive ladder can expose additional donor site morbidity due to the high recurrence rate of keloids.
Figure 7

A representative shape of the defect following complete excision that could not be closed primarily.

Muneuchi studied the long-term outcome of injection of triamcinolone acetonide into keloid scars in an Asian population [15]. Between 1985 and 2003, they treated 94 patients by injecting 1 to 10 mg of triamcinolone acetonide depending on the size of the lesion at one month intervals [15]. Thirty-one patients (33%) gave up treatment because of pain and the lack of immediate improvement. Although repeated corticosteroid injections are somewhat painful and may cause several complications, such as temporary tissue atrophy, telangiectasia, and hypopigmentation, corticosteroid injection as an adjuvant therapy has low morbidity, is cost-effective, is easy to administer, and provides durable and reliable results. Therefore, we adopted postoperative corticosteroid injection therapy similar to the one described in our previous study [6]. In our earlier experience, we did not use steroid injections in a routine manner. However, we noted increased recurrences at postoperative 3-4 months. Now, we use steroid injections on every foot keloid patient. All patients were seen at 1, 2, and 3 months postoperatively for corticosteroid injections.According to the literature, radiation therapy is an effective adjuvant modality for the treatment of keloids [16, 17]. However, we chose to exclude radiation as it is a significant risk factor for non-healing lower extremity wounds. Moreover, as we covered the defect with skin grafting, we were aware that radiation therapy as an adjuvant therapy could cause secondary ulceration or infections. In addition, the average age of lower extremity keloid patients (18 yrs) are relatively young compared to other anatomical areas, and many of these young patients and their parents fear the risk of radiation-induced malignancy [18, 19].

After repeated corticosteroid injection therapy, we applied silicone gel sheeting to the wound. The exact mechanism is still unknown, but it is suggested that hydration, occlusion, and increasing temperature affect the collagenase kinetics. Since our patients are mostly older than preschool-age, the application of a silicone gel sheet to the lower extremity wound was not bothersome to the patients [2].

Although keloid recurrence is considered extremely high, only a few studies have focused on the risk factors for keloid recurrence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of auricular keloids in our previous study revealed that the presence of previous treatment history, high patient body mass index, and low keloid growth rate owing to the longer duration of the disease are clinical risk factors for keloid recurrence [4]. According to the present study, we did not find any significant risk factors for foot keloid recurrence after multivariate logistic regression analysis. (data not shown) According to our clinical experiences, however, a relatively high recurrence was seen on the distal portion of the foot (regions of toes), and on the proximal portion (ankle). On the other hand, the mid portion of the foot is relatively free of recurrence. However, this is not statistically significant.

Our protocol resulted in a recurrence free rate of 78.5%. Although this result seems relatively low compared to our previous outcome study of other anatomical locations, most patients reported improved Patient Scar Assessment Scale (pain, itchiness, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity) (Figure 8). In particular, most patients reported improved itchiness as time progressed up to 3 months postoperatively (Figure 9). Therefore, we can conclude that complete surgical excision with full thickness skin grafting followed by postoperative injection therapy yields excellent outcome. Keloid formation was not seen on the donor site in our clinical practice, which was made possible through strict dermal closure.
Figure 8

Improved “patient scar assessment scale” by lapse of time.

Figure 9

Improved “itchiness” by lapse of time.

This study also had some limitations. First, our patients were all of Korean origin. For this reason, our results cannot be applied to Africans or African Americans. Second, as this study has the characteristics of case-series, the results could be at risk of confounding effects. Accordingly, the effectiveness of the intervention is likely to be over-estimated. Randomized controlled trials or series of single case experimental designs would be warranted to truly test the effectiveness of our treatment protocol.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that we successfully treated foot keloids over a period of eight years using our technique of complete surgical excision and full thickness skin grafting followed by four corticosteroid injections (one month intervals). Scores obtained from the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (pain, itchiness, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity) showed trends towards improvement in most participants with particular improvements demonstrated for itchiness.

Ethical approval

All study protocols used in this study were approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Kangbuk Samsung hospital. Our present study is in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Tae Hwan Park was formerly affiliated with Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea from March 2008 to February 2013. Mi-Yeon Lee, biostatistician of the Medical Information Department, performed the statistical analyses.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
(2)
Deokjeok Health Care Center

References

  1. Park JH, Park TH, Chang CH: Earrings Embedded within Earlobe Keloids. Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2013, 40: 466-467. 10.5999/aps.2013.40.4.466.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Park TH, Seo SW, Kim JK, Chang CH: Earlobe keloids: classification according to gross morphology determines proper surgical approach. Dermatol Surg. 2012, 38: 406-412. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02199.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Park TH, Park JH, Kim JK, Seo SW, Rah DK, Chang CH: Analysis of 15 Cases of Auricular Keloids Following Conchal Cartilage Grafts in an Asian Population. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013, 37: 102-105. 10.1007/s00266-012-9998-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Park TH, Seo SW, Kim JK, Chang CH: Outcomes of surgical excision with pressure therapy using magnets and identification of risk factors for recurrent keloids. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011, 128: 431-439. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821e7006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Park TH, Seo SW, Kim JK, Chang CH: Management of chest keloids. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011, 6: 49-10.1186/1749-8090-6-49.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Park TH, Seo SW, Kim JK, Chang CH: Clinical characteristics of facial keloids treated with surgical excision followed by intra- and postoperative intralesional steroid injections. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012, 36: 169-173. 10.1007/s00266-011-9781-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Aslan G, Terzioglu A, CigSar B: A massive plantar keloid. Ann Plast Surg. 2001, 47: 581-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Orimolade EA, Olabanji JK, Oladele AO, Yusuf MB: Chronic osteomyelitis in the lower extremity predisposing to the unusual formation of keloids. Singapore Med J. 2011, 52: e190-e193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Osswald SS, Elston DM, Vogel PS: Giant right plantar keloid treated with excision and tissue-engineered allograft. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003, 48: 131-134. 10.1067/mjd.2003.48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sandler B: Recurrent plantar keloid. Cutis. 1999, 63: 325-326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tolerton SK, Tonkin MA: Keloid formation after syndactyly release in patients with associated macrodactyly: management with methotrexate therapy. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011, 36: 490-497. 10.1177/1753193411402146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, Van Zuijlen PP: The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004, 113: 1960-1965. 10.1097/01.PRS.0000122207.28773.56. discussion 1966-1967View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Park TH, Chang CH: Early postoperative magnet application combined with hydrocolloid dressing for the treatment of earlobe keloids. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013, 37: 439-444. 10.1007/s00266-013-0076-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tirgan MH, Shutty CM, Park TH: Nine-month-old patient with bilateral earlobe keloids. Pediatrics. 2013, 131: e313-e317. 10.1542/peds.2012-0075.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Muneuchi G, Suzuki S, Onodera M, Ito O, Hata Y, Igawa HH: Long-term outcome of intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of keloid scars in Asian patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006, 40: 111-116. 10.1080/02844310500430003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Arons JA: The results of surgical excision and adjuvant irradiation for therapy-resistant keloids: a prospective clinical outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008, 121: 685-686.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ogawa R, Miyashita T, Hyakusoku H, Akaishi S, Kuribayashi S, Tateno A: Postoperative radiation protocol for keloids and hypertrophic scars: statistical analysis of 370 sites followed for over 18 months. Ann Plast Surg. 2007, 59: 688-691. 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3180423b32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Arneja JS, Singh GB, Dolynchuk KN, Murray KA, Rozzelle AA, Jones KD: Treatment of recurrent earlobe keloids with surgery and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008, 121: 95-99. 10.1097/01.prs.0000293755.64918.22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ogawa R, Yoshitatsu S, Yoshida K, Miyashita T: Is radiation therapy for keloids acceptable? The risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009, 124: 1196-1201. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b5a3ae.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Park et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.