Skip to main content

Risk factors for infection following ingrowing toenail surgery: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

Ingrowing toenails are a common and painful condition often requiring surgical management. Practitioners who perform surgery on ingrowing toenails include orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners, podiatrists and podiatric surgeons. There has been limited investigation into the specific surgical approaches used by Australian podiatric surgeons for ingrowing toenails, or the associated infection rates for these procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and type of ingrowing toenail surgery performed by podiatric surgeons, and identify risk factors for post-operative infection.

Methods

Data was entered into the Australian College Podiatric Surgeons (ACPS) National Audit Tool for all patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery performed by podiatric surgeons in Australia between January 2014 and December 2017. Infection within the first 30 days following surgery was recorded according to the ACPS national audit descriptors. Infection rates, risk ratios (RR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated to determine postoperative infection risk.

Results

Of 7682 records, 1831 reported 2712 diagnoses of ingrowing nails. Patients with a diagnosis of ingrowing toenails were younger, less likely to have systemic disease, and a lower proportion were female compared to those without ingrowing toenails. Furthermore, they were more likely to be diagnosed with a post-operative infection than those without ingrowing toenails (RR = 2.72; CI = 2.00–3.69; P < 0.01). Univariate risk factors for post-operative infection following ingrowing toenail surgery include age greater than 60 years (RR = 3.16; CI = 1.53–6.51; P < 0.01), surgery performed in an office setting (RR = 1.77; CI = 1.05–2.98; P = 0.04), and radical excision of toenail bed procedure (RR = 2.35; CI = 1.08–5.01; P = 0.04). Patients that underwent radical excision or office based procedures were on average older, and more likely to have systemic disease. Further, radical excision procedures were more likely to be performed in office base settings.

Conclusions

Ingrowing toenail surgery carries a greater risk of postoperative infection than other procedures performed by podiatric surgeons. Radical excision of toenail bed was associated with higher postoperative infection rates compared to other ingrowing toenail procedures. Procedures performed in an office setting carry a higher risk of infection. Further research into these associations is recommended.

Peer Review reports

Background

Ingrowing toenails may cause pain and a loss of function, and lead to patients seeking treatment from a health practitioner [1]. The prevalence of ingrowing toenails has been measured as 0.46% in a large population study in Korea [2] and 2.45% in the United States [3]. Bennet et al. [4] reported 6.7% of conditions presenting to podiatric surgeons between July 1995 and June 1996 were ingrowing toenails. In the 2017 ACPS audit report [5] this increased to 28.68%. While the increase could be explained by differences in the methodologies between these reports, both highlight that management of the condition constitutes a significant proportion of podiatric surgeons’ workload.

Contributing factors in the development of ingrowing toenails include nail cutting technique, nail shape (curvature), mechanical forces (either from ground reaction forces during gait, compressive forces from footwear, or structural malposition of the digits), hyperhidrosis, injury, and obesity [6]. Because the nail often causes a break in the skin there is potential for pre-existing wound contamination.

A recent systematic review noted that the rates of surgical site infection following any type of foot surgery has been reported as between 0 to 9.4%, and that infection rate is lower where antibiotic prophylaxis is used [7]. A clinical trial in 2007 by Bos et al. [8] looking specifically at infection rates in partial nail avulsion procedures with phenolisation and excisional matrixectomies found no significant difference in the postoperative infection rates between the two approaches. Furthermore, this trial also determined that local administration of antibiotics did not reduce the risk of postoperative infection in either of the two surgical approaches. A retrospective audit of 80 patients receiving a partial or total nail avulsion by Modha et al. in 2016 [9] found an overall postoperative infection rate of 3%.

In Australia, podiatric surgeons are registered specialist podiatrists, with an expanded scope of practice. Podiatric surgeons perform a range of procedures of the foot and ankle, including procedures for digital deformities, nerve entrapments, and ingrowing toenails [4]. The aim of this study was to assess the type of ingrowing toenail surgery performed by podiatric surgeons, and to identify risk factors for infection.

Methodology

Data collection

Data was collected by 23 podiatric surgeons using the Australasian College of Podiatric Surgeons’ (ACPS) National Audit tool. Patients were not selected for this study. Rather, their data is collected as a routine component of practice and ongoing audit activity. This tool was developed by an international panel of experts to assess outcomes of foot and ankle surgery. The design, purpose, and method through which surgeons enter data into this tool has been previously described [8, 10,11,12].

Diagnosis of conditions was recorded by surgeons using the International Classification of Disease, Version 10; Australian Modification coding system (ICD10-AM). For each surgery, a primary diagnosis and up to 30 secondary diagnoses could be recorded. Procedures were recorded using the International classification of Disease, Version 10; Australian Classification of Health Intervention coding system (ICD10-ACHI) which is based on the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS). Up to 27 procedures could be recorded for each surgery.

Postoperative infection within 30 days of surgery was recorded according to ACPS Surgical Audit Guide to Data Collection. The ACPS audit tool defines surgical site infection according to the criteria set by the Australian Council on Health Care Standards clinical indicators (version 3.1, 2012). Table 1 summarises the ACPS definition for surgical site infection. Infections were further described as either superficial or deep, and described by the location and the nature of treatment required (i.e. outpatient or admitted). Diagnosis could be made using clinical or microbiological criteria. Infections following surgery were entered into the ACPS Surgical Audit Tool as part of compliance with national audit.

Table 1 Criteria for surgical site infection classification, reproduced from the ACPS Surgical Audit Tool guidelines, based upon the Australian Council on Health Care Standards clinical indicators (version 3.1, 2012)

The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score was recorded by surgeons according to previously published methods [12]. The ASA score provides an assessment of patients’ physical status prior to surgery [13]. For the purposes for this analysis, we considered a person with an ASA status of one to have no systemic disease, and a person with an ASA of two or greater to have systemic disease.

Ethical approval was obtained from the ACPS Research Committee to access the ACPS de-identified audit database and was also provided by the Southern Cross University Human Research Ethics Committee (ECN-15-337).

Analysis

Data recorded by podiatric surgeons between January 2014 and December 2017 were included in the study. Only records which included a valid date of birth, date of surgery, ASA status, and at least one diagnosis and procedure were included in subsequent analysis. No other inclusion or exclusion criteria were applied to the records. For the purpose of this analysis, diagnosis of an ingrowing nail was made using the ICD10-AM code L60.0. Diagnosis of ingrowing toenail was considered as either present or absent regardless of the number of nail edges, digits, or feet that were affected. To calculate infection rates and risk ratios, infection was considered as either present or absent, without considering depth or location of infection.

Demographic and infection risk of patients with ingrowing nails were compared to those without ingrowing nails. Infection rates and univariate risk factors for infection were identified for patients who were exclusively diagnosed with ingrowing nails. Due to the low number of infections observed, we were unable to perform multivariate regression analysis. To identify where potential confounding factors existed, demographic factors were compared for significant risk factors.

Clopper and Pearson exact method was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals for infection rates. Fisher’s exact test (two-sided) and T-Test analyses were undertaken to assess the differences in demographics and infection rate. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 25, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The level of statistical significance was taken as p < 0.05 (5%).

Results

A total of 8819 surgeries were reported by 23 podiatric surgeons. In the 7682 records which provided complete information, 12,499 diagnoses were identified, of which 2712 were ingrowing toenails, representing 21.7% of all diagnoses. A total of 1831 records (23.8%) reported one or more ingrowing toenails as a diagnosis. Of these, ingrowing toenails were reported as the primary diagnosis in 1661 (21.6%) records, and were reported as the only diagnosis in 1561 (20.3%) records.

Demographics of patients with ingrowing toenails

Demographics of patients with and without ingrowing toenails are described in Table 2. Patients with ingrowing toenails were on average younger and less likely to have systemic disease than those without. A lower proportion were female compared to those without ingrowing toenails. The surgical procedure was more likely to have been performed in an office-based setting. Patients who had ingrowing toenail surgery were more likely to be diagnosed with a post-operative infection than those without any ingrowing nails.

Table 2 Demographics of people undergoing procedures with and without ingrowing nails

There was a bimodal age distribution for patients with ingrowing toenails, with peak diagnoses reported between ages of 10 to 19, and 60 to 64 (Fig. 1). Males were represented in greater numbers in patients with ingrowing nails under 40 years of age, and females were represented in greater numbers in patients over 40 years of age.

Fig. 1
figure1

Age and sex of patients diagnosed with ingrowing nail(s)

There were 32 other diagnoses identified in the 1831 patients who were diagnosed with ingrowing nails. The most common diagnoses were osteophyte (exostosis) (154 cases, 8.4% of patients with ingrowing nails), hammer toe deformities (68, 3.7%), and hallux valgus (28, 1.5%).

There were 61 different types of surgical procedure performed on patients with ingrowing toenails. Patients could have received multiple procedures. The most common being wedge resection (performed for 54.3% of patients), partial resection (33.6%), radical excision of the nail bed (7.4%), ostectomy of toe (5.8%), excision of exostosis (4.2%), and total removal of nail (3.9%). The most common procedures for management of ingrowing nails are described in Table 3.

Table 3 Descriptions of surgical procedures for management of ingrowing toenail [14]

Risk factors for infection following ingrowing toenail surgery

There were 1561 patients who were diagnosed with ingrowing toenails only, of whom, 65 (4.2%; CI = 3.2–5.3%) were diagnosed with infection following the procedure. Of these patients, 60 were diagnosed with superficial forefoot infection, two were diagnosed with deep forefoot infection, one with superficial midfoot infection, and two with superficial rearfoot infection. No infections necessitated hospital admission for treatment. Infection rates and risk factors for infection in patients diagnosed with ingrowing toenails is described in Table 4. Risk of infection increases with increasing age, and is higher for patients who undergo radical excision of the nail bed, or, who have a procedure in an office setting.

Table 4 Risk factors for infection following surgery in patients with ingrowing nails only

Association between type of procedure, surgical facility, and patient demographics

While infection risk is greater following procedures performed in an office setting, those undergoing the procedure in an office setting are more likely to have systemic disease, and have a higher average age (Table 5).

Table 5 Demographics of patients undergoing procedure according to type of surgical facility

Those who underwent a wedge, partial, or total resection of the nail were on average younger and less likely to have systemic disease than those that underwent a radical excision of the nail bed (Table 6). Additionally, those who underwent radical excision were more likely to have the procedure performed in an office setting.

Table 6 Demographics of patients undergoing procedure according to type of procedure

Those who underwent a wedge resection in an office-based setting were at a greater risk of postoperative infection compared to those who had the same procedure in hospital or surgicentre (Table 7). There was no such risk increase for those patients who had a partial resection. The number of infections in those who had a radical excision of the nail bed or total removal were too low to be included in this analysis.

Table 7 Infection rates depending on procedure and location

Discussion

In a previous clinical audit of podiatric surgeons, Bennett [4] examined 786 patient files between July 1995 and June 1996. Bennett [4] found 106 of 1575 (6.7%) reported procedures were for ingrowing nails. In this current study, we have found the frequency of presentation of ingrowing nails to podiatric surgeons to be higher (21.7% or all presenting conditions). These differences may be attributed to the differences in data collection. The current study reviewed data collected using the ACPS audit tool. Data is entered into this system in real time by Podiatric surgeons. Bennett [4] reported data collected by a researcher retrospectively reviewing clinical records. This collection method may therefore have not identified all diagnoses of ingrown toenails within these records. Moreover, podiatric surgery has progressed since Bennett [4] undertook the study, establishing itself as a mainstream surgical profession, leading to increased referral pathways and service access. For minor procedures that may have otherwise been performed by a general practitioner, or may have resulted in a long wait list time in the public system, podiatric surgeons provide an alternate pathway.

Similar to a recent study [2], we have identified that ingrowing nails have a bimodal age distribution, with peaks in teenagers and people aged 40–50 years. Males were represented in greater numbers under the age of 40 and females were represented in greater numbers over the age of 40. The peak in prevalence of ingrowing toenails in teenagers could be attributed to greater physical activity in this age group, as an association between high levels of physical activity and ingrowing toenails in young males has been previously been demonstrated [15]. Poorer nail cutting practices and hyperhidrosis may also account for the higher rates of ingrowing toenails seen in this population [6]. The peak seen in the 40–50 year age group and the greater representation of women in this group could be accounted for by the increased prevalence of foot deformities (such as hallux abducto valgus) in older populations and females [16]. Such foot deformities have been described as a risk factor for the development of ingrowing toenails [2]. Older populations, in particular older females, are also more likely to wear ill-fitting shoes [17] that create compression forces on the toenail and play a role in the development of ingrowing toenails [6].

As described by Levy [3] and Cho [2], females represent a greater proportion of people affected by ingrowing nails, although ingrowing nails are also prevalent in younger males. However, Menz et al. [18] found that more nail procedures were performed for males than females by private surgeons. Our results showed that women were more likely to have surgery for an ingrown toenail than men, accounting for 57% of patients undergoing surgery for ingrowing toenails. In addition to the presence of foot deformity and poor footwear, the greater number of women undergoing nail surgery could be attributed to the fact men may be less likely to access health care [19].

In this current study, we identified that the rate of infection is higher for people undergoing procedures for ingrowing nails, than those undergoing procedures for other foot pathology. However, the rate of infection is lower than that reported in a similar study exploring postoperative infection after excisional toenail matrixectomy [20]. The elevated rate of infection may be due to the presence of pre-existing wound contamination or infection.

Alternatively, infection rates may be elevated due to the perceived ‘less-serious’ nature of nail procedures compared to surgeries of bone and joint. This perception could potentially reduce the likelihood of antibiotic prophylaxis, or lead to procedures being performed in office-based rather than hospital facilities where intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is available. Further, infection rates may be elevated because of reduced patient adherence to postoperative instructions. Given the high number of procedures performed by podiatric surgeons in an office setting, and the increased infection rate in this group, podiatric surgeons should consider the procedure location, and antibiotic prophylaxis, in their decision-making process.

The use of antibiotics in in the surgical management of ingrowing nails is unclear. Córdoba-Fernández et al. [21] recommended the use of prophylactic antibiotics only in infective ingrowing toenails. A Cochrane review revealed that the use of antibiotics has not been shown to result in a difference in infection rates [22]. Using a similar dataset, a prospective cohort study by Butterworth et al. [11] showed that the use of perioperative antibiotics in foot and ankle surgery may reduce the risk of infection. However, Butterworth et al. [11] did not separate their study population into specific procedure groups. Consequently, whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduces infection rates following ingrowing toenail surgery may be unclear. However, considering that many ingrowing toenail procedures are performed by podiatric surgeons under local anaesthetic, in office settings, where perioperative antibiotics may not be available, changes to practice should be considered to reduce infection rates in this population. Given that peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis is standard procedure in hospitals, patients undergoing sharp excisional ingrowing nail surgery should be admitted for these procedures.

Our current study showed that the choice of procedure for management of ingrowing nails is associated with patient age and ASA status. Patients who underwent radical excision were on average older, and more likely to have systemic disease than those who underwent wedge or partial resection. This could be due to increased concern regarding healing times following chemical ablation in the older patient with systematic disease, or concern regarding long term aesthetics for the younger person. Alternatively, wedge and partial excisions may commonly be utilised as an earlier line of treatment. Ingrowing toenails of greater severity or associated with gross deformation or disease of the nail, or ingrowing nails recalcitrant to treatment, may require radical nail bed excision. Procedure choice may be dependent on the presence of peri-ungual soft tissue variation seen around the nail fold, such as ungelabia and onychomatrixoma. Procedure choice may also be due to associated bone pathology such as subungual exostoses, which is being addressed concomitantly. Furthermore, a surgeon may choose an excisional matrixectomy over a chemical procedure to aid direct visualisation of target tissue when revision surgery is being performed in the case of primary procedural failure.

In the current study, a higher infection rate has been associated with radical excision procedures. The nail and nail folds have been identified as the most heavily contaminated area of the foot and ankle and are difficult to decontaminate [23]. Radical nail bed excision potentially disseminates debris from the nail folds, contaminating subcutaneous tissue and periosteum overlying the distal phalanx. Radical bed excision may also be a procedure of choice for more severe ingrowing toenails with active or unresolved paronychia, hyper-granulation tissue and bone deformity. The higher infection rate may be attributed to an unresolved infection at the time of surgery. However, patients undergoing radical excision were more likely to be older, have systemic disease, and have the procedure performed in an office setting. Consideration should, therefore, be given to admitting these patients to a day surgery facility, especially those with systemic disease who are aged over 60.

This study has identified that some procedures (wedge resection) for ingrowing nails performed in an office setting are associated with a higher rate of infection. This could be due to the greater emphasis on the design and maintenance of hospital and day surgery facilities for pathological microorganism control. However, those patients undergoing procedures in office settings were also older, and more likely to have systemic disease. A question raised in this study is why are older patients with systemic disease more likely to have a procedure performed outside a hospital setting? It could be convenience, cost (including lack of Medicare and insurance funding), or a combination of these and other factors. Further research is required to answer this question. Of interest to the podiatric profession is that no increase in infection risk was identified for partial resection (with phenol) in an office setting. This result is likely due to partial resections being less invasive, not involving skin incisions, or bone. Moreover, phenol has been shown to provide anti-bacterial activity against both gram positive and gram negative bacteria [24].

In this current study, we have shown that certain population groups have a higher reported rate of infection. However, due to the low rate of infections, we were unable to perform multivariate regression analysis to control for other factors. For example, whilst the rate of infection is higher in patients who underwent radical excision of nail bed, the average age of a patient who had this procedure was also higher, and they were also more likely to have systemic disease.

There are limitations in this study which could have resulted in misreporting of infection rates. Infection could have been identified by the surgeons based on clinical manifestations only, and did not require microbiological confirmation in all cases. Further, it is possible that some patients would present to other members of their health care team (for example general practitioner) in the first instance of a minor post-surgical infection. Also, it is possible that infection rates were affected by those patients with a pre-existing infection. Further, no information was available regarding the use of antibiotics.

The follow up period for this study was 30 days and did not consider whether the procedure resulted in permanent resolution of the patient’s condition. It is possible that patients who present to podiatric surgeons have had previous ingrowing toenail surgery, or more complex health concerns than those patients who present to a non-specialist podiatrist, therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution outside of these settings. However, a key strength of this research design is that it measures real-world practice.

Conclusion

Ingrowing toenail surgery is associated with a greater risk of postoperative infection than other procedures performed by podiatric surgeons. Radical excision of toenail bed was associated with higher postoperative infection rates compared to other ingrowing toenail procedures. Some procedures performed in an office setting carry a higher risk of infection. Further research into the associations identified in this study is recommended. Specifically, controlled and prospective studies that investigate outcomes of ingrown toenail procedures would demonstrate causative links with important variables. Further exploration of the factors which contribute to decision making by podiatric surgeons regarding the type or settings of surgery would be of benefit. Finally, a comparison of microbiology confirmed versus clinically confirmed diagnosis of infection may help with reporting accurate infection rates.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the Australian College of Podiatric Surgeons.

Abbreviations

ACPS:

Australasian College of Podiatric Surgeons

ASA:

American Society of Anaesthesiologists

ICD10-ACHI:

International classification of Disease, Version 10; Australian Classification of Health Intervention

ICD10-AM:

International Classification of Disease, Version 10; Australian Modification

MBS:

Medicare Benefits Schedule

RR:

Risk Ratio

CI:

Confidence Interval

References

  1. 1.

    Imai A, Takayama K, Satoh T, Katoh T, Yokozeki H. Ingrown nails and pachyonychia of the great toes impair lower limb functions: improvement of limb dysfunction by medical foot care. Int J Dermatol. 2011;50:215–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04697.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cho SY, Kim YC, Choi JW. Epidemiology and bone-related comorbidities of ingrown nail: a nationwide population-based study. J Dermatol. 2018;45:1418–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.14659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Levy LA. Prevalence of chronic podiatric conditions in the US. National Health Survey 1990. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1992;82:221–3. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-82-4-221.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bennett PJ. Prevalence and type of foot surgery performed in Australia: a clinical review. Foot. 2007;17:197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2007.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Australasian College of Podiatric Surgeons 2017 National Audit Summary Report. [internet] 2017 [cited 26 Feb 2020]. Available from: https://www.acps.edu.au/publications.

  6. 6.

    DeLauro NM, DeLauro TM. Onychocryptosis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2004;21:617–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2004.05.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Modha MRK, Morriss-Roberts C, Smither M, Larholt J, Reilly I. Antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018;11:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-018-0303-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bos AMC, Van Tilburg MWA, Van Sorge AA, Klinkenbijl JHG. Randomized clinical trial of surgical technique and local antibiotics for ingrowing toenail. Br J Surg. 2007;94:292–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5691.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Modha RK, Latham A, Barlow-Kearsley E, Hodder S. Evaluating clinical outcomes of nail surgery: a retrospective audit of 80 patients using PASCOM-10. Pod Now. 2016;19:10–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hermann R, Meuter R, Bennett P. Improving the outcomes of foot and ankle surgery. Professional impact of the Australasian College of Podiatric Surgeons' audit tool. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8:O18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-8-S2-O18.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Butterworth P, Terrill A, Barwick A, Hermann R. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in podiatric foot and ankle surgery. Infec Dis Heal. 2017;22:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-018-0303-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Matthews JH, Terrill AJ, Barwick AL, Butterworth PA. Venous thromboembolism in podiatric foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Spec. 2018;11:444–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640017750256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology. 1978;49:239–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-197810000-00003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Australian Government Department of Health. Medicare Benefits Schedule Book Operating from 01 January 2014. [internet] Commonwealth of Australia; 2013 Dec [cited 27 May 2020]. Available from: http://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/Downloads-201401.

  15. 15.

    Pico AMP, Verjano E, Mayordomo R. Relation between nail consistency and incidence of ingrown toenails in young male runners. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2017;107:137–43. https://doi.org/10.7547/15-121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-3-21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Menz HB, Morris ME. Footwear characteristics and foot problems in older people. Gerontology. 2005;51:346. https://doi.org/10.1159/000086373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Menz HB, Gilheany MF, Landorf KB. Foot and ankle surgery in Australia: a descriptive analysis of the Medicare benefits schedule database, 1997–2006. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008;1:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-1-10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bertakis KD. Azari R, HelmsLJ, Callahan EJ, Robbins JA. Gender differences in the ultilization of health care services. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:147–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rusmir A, Salerno A. Postoperative infection after excisional toenail matrixectomy: a retrospective clinical audit. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2011;101:316–22. https://doi.org/10.7547/1010316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Córdoba-Fernández A, Ruiz-Garrido G, Canca-Cabrera Á. Algorithm for the management of antibiotic prophylaxis in onychocryptosis surgery. Foot. 2010;20:140–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2010.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Eekhof JA, Van Wijk B, Knuistingh Neven A, van der Wouden JC. Interventions for ingrowing toenails. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001541.pub3.

  23. 23.

    Ostrander RV, Brage ME, Botte MJ. Bacterial skin contamination after surgical preparation in foot and ankle surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;406:246–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000030176.56585.d3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sabbineni J. Phenol-an effective antibacterial agent. J Medic Organic Chem. 2016;3:182–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank those surgeons and patients who made this study possible.

Funding

The research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AJT and PAB were responsible for data analysis. All authors contributed to interpretation of results, drafting and revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander J. Terrill.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the ACPS Research Committee to access the ACPS de-identified audit database and was also provided by the Southern Cross University Human Research Ethics Committee (ECN-15-337).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Terrill, A.J., Green, K.J., Salerno, A. et al. Risk factors for infection following ingrowing toenail surgery: a retrospective cohort study. J Foot Ankle Res 13, 48 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00414-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Podiatry
  • Ingrowing toenail
  • Nail surgery
  • Infection
  • Onychocryptosis