- Open Access
The mystery of the COVID toes – turning evidence-based medicine on its head
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research volume 13, Article number: 38 (2020)
The recent and rapid emergence of COVID-19 infection has led to a flood of publications describing all aspects of the disease and its presentation. The appearance of chilblain-like lesions, in children and young adults has particularly caught the attention of healthcare professionals with an interest in the foot. With such a novel infection, demand for information is high at a time when evidence is scarce. Consequently, there has been a renaissance in the publication of case studies. This type of research, previously relegated from many mainstream journals, as a low level source of evidence, has permitted the rapid reporting, publication and dissemination of much needed clinical data which can be used as a foundation to inform further research and investigations about a new global infection.
It has been 2 months since reports began to appear in the medical literature and on social media discussing the appearance of chilblain like lesions on the toes of children and young adults [1, 2]. The phenomenon received a lot of coverage in the media - at a time when available evidence was in short supply. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic has presented a new challenge. For many years, healthcare professionals have been trained in the use of evidence-based medicine to understand and guide their decisions and management of patient pathologies. Judgement on the quality of the evidence is made through assessment of the methodology of the work and ranking it within the hierarchy of evidence . High level evidence from clinical trials and systematic reviews are held as the gold standard for informing clinicians, but what happens when they do not exist? With COVID-19, clinicians are faced with a disease where little is known but the need for knowledge is high. In the light of this, we have seen the re-emergence of a type of paper which had previously been threatened with extinction in mainstream medical journals  – the humble case report and case series.
Case reports were a common publication in many medical and healthcare journals in previous decades but their existence in the literature was increasingly questioned over their utility in modern healthcare  as evidence based medicine emerged in the late 1980’s. With the establishment of the hierarchy of evidence they were firmly placed at the bottom . It soon followed that many medical journals sought to reduce or entirely remove them. They were not so frequently cited as other publication types  and so could potentially reduce a journal’s impact factor. Subsequently, many publishers and professional medical organisations created open access, online platforms accepting case studies separate from their main journals.
With the global emergence of COVID-19, the world was exposed to a new type of infection, about which very little was known in terms of its presentation, clinical features and management. With the levels of mortality occurring with the infection, the need for clinical data was urgent. Consequently, journals, with the lack of any high-level evidence, had to turn to expert commentary and begin to piece together the COVID-19 puzzle together using case reports and case series. In fact, up to June 5th, a search of PUBMED using the operator terms “Case [title]” AND “corona OR covid” yields over 700 papers published this year.
In April, early papers reported the emergence of a suspected phenomenon of chilblain-like lesions appearing in children and young adults [1, 2]. It was reported as ‘suspected’, as the subjects were not able to be fully assessed or indeed even confirmed as having had the infection. With increasing interest in these lesions, national newspapers in many countries were reporting these as potential signs of the disease of children and further medical publications rapidly followed [8,9,10,11,12,13,14] on a daily basis. All of these were case reports and case series. To create a clearer picture of how the virus affected the skin, additional patient data was requested from clinicians globally and collected by the American Academy of Dermatology and the British Association of Dermatologists to try and collate a clearer clinical picture of the phenomenon. Within a couple of months, the first dataset was published collating 318 cases of “COVID toe” .
The survey collected data primarily from physicians, with contributions from other healthcare professionals, consisted of collated case reports. Its conclusion highlighted the limitations of the case study methodology. From the data the prevalence was not able to be estimated, causation was not able to be proven (many subjects had not undergone any testing for the infection) and only hypotheses could be generated as to the natural history of the disease and its pathophysiology. Retrospective bias was also an issue. However, despite this, at this time the hidden power of case study in rapidly reporting new phenomenon, diseases and clinical observations  has been used to its fullest extent from which further research and investigation can be based as the foundation of new knowledge.
Consequently, the emergence of a global epidemic has served to highlight how all types and levels of evidence can have utility and relevance in modern healthcare. Even with known limitations, they can fulfil an urgent need to progress knowledge in times of need.
Availability of data and materials
Acute acro-ischemia in the child at the time of covid-19 [https://www.fip-ifp.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/04/acroischemia-ENG.pdf]. Accessed 6 June 2020.
Mazzotta F, Bonifazi E. A new vasculitis at the time of Covid-19. Dermatologica Pediatrica 2020. [https://www.ejpd.com/images/nuova-vasculite-covid-ENG.pdf]. Accessed 6 June 2020.
Guyatt G, Sackett D, Sinclair J. Users guide to the medical literature IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. J Am Med Assoc. 1995:274:1800-4.
Mason RA. The case report – an endangered species? Anaesthesia. 2001;56:99–102.
Albrecht J, Meves A, Bigby M. Case reports and case series from lancet had significant impact on medical literature. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:1227–32.
Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. London: Churchill Livingston; 1997.
Patsopoulos NA, Analatos AA, Ioannidis JP. Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA. 2005;293:2362–6.
Suchonwanit P, Leerunyakul K, Kositkuljorn C. Cutaneous manifestations in COVID-19: lessons learned from current evidence. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):e57–60.
Nirenberg MS, del Mar Ruiz Herrera M. Foot manifestations in a COVID-19 positive patient: a case study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2020 (early view).https://doi.org/10.7547/20-088.
Landa N, Mendieta-Eckert M, Fonda-Pascual P, Aguirre T. Chilblain-like lesions on feet and hands during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59:739–43.
Andina D, Noguera-Morel L, Bascuas-Arribas M, Gaitero-Tristán J, Alonso-Cadenas JA, Escalada-Pellitero S, Hernández-Martín Á, de la Torre-EspiM, Colmenero I, Torrelo A. Chilblains in children in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020 (early view).https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.14215.
Colonna C, Monzani NA, Rocchi A, Gianotti R, Boggio F, Gelmetti C. Chilblain-like lesions in children following suspected COVID-19 infection. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020 (early view). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.019.
el Azhary R. Re: chilblain-like lesions on feet and hands during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59:748.
Kanitakis J, Lesort C, Danset M, Jullien D. Chilblain-like acral lesions during the covid-19 pandemic (“covid toes”) : Histologic, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical study of 17 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 (early view). https://www.jaad.org/article/S0190-9622(20)31022-7/pdf.
Freeman EE, McMahon DE, Lipoff JB, Rosenbach M, Kovarik C, Takeshita J, French LE, Thiers BH, Hruza GJ, Fox LP. Pernio-like skin lesion sassociated with COVID-19: a case series of 318 patients from 8 countries. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 (early view).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.109.
Lennon P, Fenton JE. The case for the case report: refine to save. Ir J Med Sci. 2011;180:529–32.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
IB none declared. AB: None Declared.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Bristow, I.R., Borthwick, A.M. The mystery of the COVID toes – turning evidence-based medicine on its head. J Foot Ankle Res 13, 38 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00408-w
- Evidence based medicine
- Case study