Skip to main content


  • Research
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

A novel application of strain sonoelastography can detect changes in Achilles tendon elasticity during isometric contractions of increasing intensity

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research201912:30

  • Received: 7 November 2018
  • Accepted: 10 May 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Mechanical and morphological properties of the Achilles tendon are altered in disease and in response to changes in mechanical loading. In the last few years different ultrasound based technologies have been used to detect tendon mechanical properties changes mainly in resting condition. Therefore the aim of this study was to evaluate if strain sonoelastography can identify changes in Achilles tendon elasticity during isometric contractions of increasing intensity.


This cross-sectional study enrolled 37 healthy volunteers (19 women) with mean (±SD) age of 27.1 (±7.0) years between January and June 2017. Strain sonoelastography images of the Achilles tendon were acquired during an isometric ramp force (0 kg, 0.5 kg, 1 kg, 2 kg, 5 kg and, 10 kg). An external reference material was used to provide a comparison between the examined tissue and a material of constant elasticity. Friedman test with post hoc pairwise comparison were used to determine the correlation between the difference contraction levels.


The median and interquartile range (IQR) values for the strain ratio were 1.61 (1.5–2.9) in a relaxed state and 1.30 (1.07–2.02), 1.00 (0.76–1.66), 0.81 (0.70–1.19), 0.47 (0.39–0.73) and 0.33 (0.28–0.40) for 0.5 kg, 1 kg, 2 kg, 5 kg and 10 kg, respectively revealing increased tendon hardness with increasing contraction intensities. Friedman test revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the strain ratio between all contractions except between 0.5 kg – 1 kg (p = 0.41); 1 kg – 2 kg (p = 0.12) and 5 kg – 10 kg (p = 0.12).


Strain sonoelastography can detect changes in Achilles tendon elasticity between different contraction intensities. The results provide an original force-elasticity curve for the Achilles tendon in a healthy, asymptomatic population.

Trial registration

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Canton Ticino.


  • Strain sonoelastography
  • Achilles tendon
  • Elasticity


The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the body and constitutes a dynamic link between the triceps surae and the calcanous bone [1, 2]. A high mechanical load is applied to the Achilles-gastrocnemius complex and tendon stiffness can increase in response to chronic load [3]. Changes in glycosaminoglycan content, reduction of collagen cross-linking content and alignment of collagen fibers are factors that may alter tendon elasticity [3].

Overuse injuries of the Achilles tendon can occur with excessive loading during physical exercise [4]. Repetitive overload and subsequent microtrauma can lead to inflammation of the tendon sheath or degeneration of the tendon body [5]. The mechanical and morphological properties of the Achilles tendon are altered in disease and in response to changes in mechanical loading, including a reduction in tendon stiffness and a softening of the tendon measured with sonoelastography in individuals with chronic tendinopathy [6, 7].

A healthy Achilles tendon with intact mechanical and morphological properties is expected to become stiffer and harder with increased tensile load during isometric contraction. [8, 9] As shown by Magnusson et al. [10], both deformation and strain of a healthy Achilles tendon increase with an increase in tendon isometric force. Similarly, Lersch et al. [11] demonstrated increased strain of the Achilles tendon when the tendon was subjected to an increased load. Wren et al. [12] showed an increased Young’s modulus in a similar in vitro investigation using a servo-hydraulic materials testing machine, and although in vivo and in vitro results are not directly comparable, the Achilles tendon seems to behave similarly.

Shear wave sonoelastography is based on acoustic radiation force impulses through tissue to obtain the elastic modulus (Young modulus, kPa) and is typically employed to measure Achilles tendon elasticity. An ultrasound pulse produces a directional shear wave within the tissues, and the propagation velocity of this wave is calculated using an ultrafast ultrasound tracking technique [13]. However, given that the upper limit of 800 kPa of Young modulus is often reached in the Achilles tendon when the ankle is near 0° of plantar flexion, this measurement technique is not suitable for the evaluation of the tendon in a functional position (near 0° plantar flexion), during usual movement or with additional load [14]. Moreover, signal saturation occurs when the Achilles tendon approaches the 0° plantar flexion or a dorsiflexed position and leads to an underestimation of the shear wave speed [15].

Strain sonoelastography is another ultrasound-based technique that enables the elasticity of musculoskeletal structures to be evaluated [1618]. Tissue compression with an ultrasound probe is applied to a surface producing a displacement within the tissue. The displacement, which is less pronounced in harder than in softer materials, is calculated by comparing B-mode image pairs before and after compression [19]. A novel method using strain sonoelastography and calculation of a strain ratio was recently developed and provides a semi-quantitative evaluation of the tendon based on the elastography color scale [8]. Combined with an external reference material, this approach can identify changes between a contracted and relaxed state [8], however the accuracy of this novel method to detect small changes in tendon mechanical properties due to load, needs further investigation. The use of an external reference material with known elasticity properties allows the computation of the strain ratio between the tendon color scale and the external material which is not affected by changes during contraction. This method has established reliability [8, 20].

The added value of this methods is the combination of a measure of elasticity, provided by the transverse compression force of the probe, and the progressive longitudinal mechanical load given by the contraction of the triceps surae muscle.

A more comprehensive analysis of the Achilles tendon with evaluation of the tendon under load is warranted as this approach could provide a clearer indication about the functional impairment of tendon structure. Therefore, together with clinical history and standard imaging this technology could ultimately lead to an enhancement of the diagnosis and management of tendinopathy.

Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate if strain sonoelastography using the strain ratio, can accurately detect changes in Achilles tendon elasticity during isometric contractions of varying intensity in healthy volunteers.

We hypothesized that differences between the selected contraction levels could be identified by a change in strain ratio of the sonoelastography color scale.


Study population

Thirty-seven healthy participants (19 women) were prospectively enrolled in the study between January to June 2017. The mean (±SD) age, height and weight were 27.1 (±7.0) years, 172.2 (±9.8) cm and 67.5 (±13.2) kg, respectively.

Inclusion criteria for the selection of the sample were: no history of tendon and/or foot injury or surgery; any painful episodes in the lower limb in the last year. Exclusion criteria were: history of connective tissue, endocrine or metabolic diseases; systemic inflammatory disorder; spondyloarthropathy, rheumatoidarthritis, or hypercholesterolemia. Furthermore, those usually taking estrogen or steroid treatment were excluded.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Canton Ticino, conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and written informed consent forms were signed by participants. The report of this study adheres to STROBE (Strengthening The Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.

Mean and standard deviation values of relaxed and contracted strain ratios from a previous study [8] using the same experimental setup were used to calculate the minimal sample size necessary to ensure a statistical power of 90% at the 5% significance level for a two-tailed hypothesis test. The Cohen’s d effect size has been calculated using the pooled standard deviation of the previous study [8]. Effect size was very large (d = 1.69). The calculation, performed with STATA 14 (College Station, TX, USA), showed that the minimal sample size of n = 32 was required.

Ultrasound and sonoelastography

A MyLab Class C ultrasound device (Esaote, Genoa, Italy) with a linear probe (3–13 MHz) and elastography software were used to perform the measurements. The Achilles tendon was visualized through a custom made external material (Zerdine® CIRS, Norfolk, VA, USA). The properties of the reference material were tested by the manufacturer, the elasticity was 102 kPa, speed of sound was 1580 m/s, and the attenuation coefficient was 0.5 dB/cm/MHz. The external reference material was utilized to guarantee a comparison between the Achilles tendon and a material with known elasticity (102 kPa). Furthermore, the reference material was used as stand-off pads to create a steady contact between the transducer and the skin and to enhance the stability of the sonographer’s hand [21].

Light and rhythmic perpendicular compression was applied by the operator with the ultrasound probe on the reference material. A quality indicator graph on a screen in front of the operator was controlled to regulate the amount of the compression across condition and participants. Compression–relaxation cycles were provided for 5 s (approximately 100 frames) for each acquisition, during this time the sonoelastogram remained as stable as possible.


The torque of the ankle was assessed using a dynamometer connected to a force sensor that operated linearly in the range between 0 and 100 N (Mod. TF2/S; CCT Transducers, Turin, Italy). The force sensor was attached to a wooden board connected to a hinge that allowed natural dorsiflexion and plantar flexion of the ankle (Fig. 1). The board was fixed in order to permit isometric contractions only at a fixed angle of 0° dorsiflexion. The force measured by the force sensor was proportional to the torque exerted at the ankle level. Force signals were amplified using MISO-II (OT Bioelettronica, Turin, Italy; bandwidth 0–80 Hz) and presented to the participants as a real time visual feedback (60 Hz refresh rate) on a PC monitor positioned 50 cm in front of the subjects.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Schematic of the experimental setup. The foot was securely attached to a dynamometer with a wooden board at a fixed angle of 0° of dorsiflexion. The force measured by the load cell was proportional to the torque exerted at the ankle level. The ultrasound probe was placed in a longitudinal scan at the level of the medial malleolus


Participants were asked to lie in a prone position with the foot tightly secured within the dynamometer with the ankle in a neutral position (0° of plantarflexion). Prior to the recordings, the participants practiced the contraction with the instruction to “push on the board as if you were pushing onto the top of your toes”) and a contraction of 10 kg (maximum strength required) was performed to verify that the heel remained in contact with the dynamometer and to familiarize the participant with the visual feedback. Heel movement was prevented during the contraction by firmly securing the foot in the dynamometer with two belts over foot and ankle.

Both the left and right Achilles tendon of each participant were evaluated during isometric plantar flexion under increasing contraction intensities (0 kg, 0.5 kg, 1 kg, 2 kg, 5 kg and, 10 kg) performed in a randomised order. Strain sonoelastography of the Achilles tendon, was performed in a longitudinal scan using the Elasto-Dual software (Fig. 3). The external reference material was included in the image and the measurement were performed at the level of the medial malleolus applying an established and reliable method [8].

To guarantee the evaluation of the same tendon part under the different conditions, a reference point on the medial malleolus was drawn and the ultrasound transducer was aligned with the point each time. All the ultrasound procedures were conducted by the same, well trained operator, with 8 years of ultrasound and elastography experience.

The colour scale of the elastograms ranged from red, showing soft tissue, to blue showing hard tissue, whereas green to yellow indicating medium tissue elasticity. The elastograms were automatically constructed maintaining the same ideal settings during the entire study, as recommended by Havre et al. [22] in a previous study.

Image analysis

The analysis of the 5 s ultrasound clip was leaded using a customized MATLAB® software (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). Two different regions of interest (ROI) were drawn on the sonoelastographic images, including the reference material and the Achilles tendon (Fig. 3). The range between soft and hard (from red to blue) was divided into 256 levels (0–255) according to the depth of colour of the sonoelastographic image where blue corresponds to 0 and red to 255. The frames of the entire clip were averaged to extract a single image where the colour distribution was calculated. The median and interquartile range of colours was computed for each acquisition.

Strain ratios were calculated between the Achilles tendon median range of colours and the external reference material median range of colours, comparisons between the different contraction levels were computed for each tendon.

Statistical analysis

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics (mean ± SD) were used to describe the characteristics of the sample. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate if the data were normally distributed. Non-parametric, independent samples, Mann-Whitney test was then used to assess whether there were significant differences in Achilles tendon elasticity between men and women and between the right and left Achilles tendon.

Since the data were not normally distributed, Friedman test with post hoc pairwise comparison (Wilcoxon signed-rang test) were used to determine the correlation between elasticity measured at different contraction levels. Bonferroni correction was applied and statistical significance was set to α = 0.05.

Data are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR).


No significant difference in Achilles tendon strain ratios was observed between men median (IQR) 1.31 (0.96–1.81) and women 2.00 (1.19–2.81) (p = 0.6) or between the left 1.48 (1.13–2.06) and right Achilles tendon 1.71 (0.94–2.91) (p = 0.5), therefore the data were pooled and further analysed as an entire sample.

The median (IQR) values for the strain ratio were 1.61 (1.5–2.9) in a relaxed state and 1.30 (1.07–2.02), 1.00 (0.76–1.66), 0.81 (0.70–1.19), 0.47 (0.39–0.73) and 0.33 (0.28–0.40) for 0.5 kg, 1 kg, 2 kg, 5 kg and 10 kg, respectively. Friedman test for related samples showed significant (p < 0.01) differences between all contraction levels except for 0.5 kg – 1 kg (p = 0.41); 1 kg – 2 kg (p = 0.12) and 5 kg – 10 kg (p = 0.12) (Fig. 2). Detailed pairwise comparison for all the contraction levels are presented in Table 1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Force-elasticity curve. Box plot showing the median and interquartile range of values of the entire sample during the different contraction levels. The orange line represent the force-elasticity curve. * p < 0.01; statistical significant difference between the different contraction levels

Table 1

Pairwise comparison for the different contraction levels. Statistical significant results (p < 0.01) are represented in bold

Contraction levels (Kg)

Pairwise comparison

Contraction levels (Kg)

Pairwise comparison

Contraction levels (Kg)

Pairwise comparison

Contraction levels (Kg)

Pairwise comparison

Contraction levels (Kg)

Pairwise comparison


p < 0.01


p = 0.41


p = 0.12


p < 0.01


p = 0.12


p < 0.01


p < 0.01


p < 0.01


p < 0.01


p < 0.01


p < 0.01


p < 0.01


p < 0.01


p < 0.01


p < 0.01


This is the first study to evaluate changes in Achilles tendon elasticity using strain sonoelastography during progressive increases in contraction force. The results provide an original force-elasticity curve for the Achilles tendon in a healthy, asymptomatic population (Fig. 2).

This study confirms that strain sonoelastography can detect changes in Achilles tendon elasticity between a relaxed state and all the examined contraction levels; the Achilles tendon progressively become harder across the different contraction levels, and this increment was seen as a reduction of the strain ratio as previously reported in other studies [8, 9]. A previous study [8] with a similar experimental setup showed large variability of the Achilles tendon strain ratio between healthy subjects when measured in the resting state. This variability, similarly to our study, is reduced when load is put on the tendon (see Fig. 2). The large variability seen between participants when the tendon is measured in the relaxed state is likely related to variation in physical activity levels, age and individual anatomical differences. Although tendon elasticity changed across contraction intensities, the contraction levels with similar intensity (0.5 kg – 1 kg (p = 0.41); 1 kg – 2 kg (p = 0.12) and 5 kg – 10 kg (p = 0.12)) revealed similar measures of elasticity thus likely the difference in load was insufficient to change tendon mechanical properties to a significant extent.

Previous studies [2326] used the Kager Fat pad (KFP) as a medium to calculate the strain ratio in the evaluation of Achilles tendon elasticity. The results showed moderate to good reliability [24] and the authors suggested the use of strain elastography in the evaluation of the Achilles tendon following surgery [23]. However, caution should be taken when measuring strain ratio with a biological tissue such as KFP since other tissues could encounter changes in elasticity due to pathology, recovery or to different measurement conditions. The mechanical properties of the KFP changes following the hardening of the Achilles tendon and this change is not always linear, likely because of anatomical differences between subjects e.g. longer soleus muscle, more connective tissue, or due to the compression of the Achilles tendon on the underlying tissues. In the current study, we used an external material with a constant elasticity. Figure 3 shows an apparent softening of the reference material as the tendon became harder. The sonoelatography algorithm implemented in the ultrasound machine display the elasticity of the tendon with an “auto-scale” color range. The softest and the hardest structure visible in each of the ROI analyzed are displayed in red and blue respectively. For this reason, we can observe a progressive color change of the reference material (green at 0 kg, red at 10 kg) (see Fig. 3) because the tendon progressively becomes the harder structure within the ROI. However, strain ratios (i.e. ratios between the median colors) have been used as an index of elasticity which is not affected by the “auto-scale” color range.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Achilles tendon sonoelastography during an isometric ramp contraction. Elasto-Dual images of the Achilles tendon during the isometric ramp contraction; the regions of interest (i.e., yellow boxes) define the two tissues examined for the calculation of the strain ratio. The six different boxes represent the different contraction levels

The findings of the present study are supported by other investigations which measured strain of the Achilles tendon using a strain tracking procedure during maximal voluntary contractions [10, 27]. However, in these studies tendon displacement and tendon strain were measured using the aponeurosis-tendon complex while in the present study we have characterized changes in tendon elasticity with a direct measure of the free tendon. Other ultrasound-based techniques with direct measures of the tendon (i.e. shear wave elastography) have measured an increase of Young modulus (kPa) while the tendon is tensioned by changing the degree of ankle flexion [14, 15]. However in those studies it was suggested that the use of shear wave elastography should be limited to the relaxed tendon to avoid saturation of the signal.

Another promising 2D ultrasound technology, based on a speckle tracking algorithm [28] has been proposed. A non-uniform regional strain behavior of the different layers of the Achilles tendon has been observed. However given the different nature of strain sonoelastography measurement compared to the speckle tracking technique, the results cannot be directly compared.

Future studies which apply strain sonoelastography to evaluate the free tendon in different ankle positions or under different conditions (i.e. varying contraction intensity; functional tasks) are now warranted to better understand and characterize the behavior of the Achilles tendon. Moreover, the addition strain sonoelastography measures of the Achilles tendon during loaded contractions may increase diagnostic capability in Achilles tendinopathy and future research is needed to explore this.

Strain sonoelastography requires manual compression and therefore variation in the level of pressure of the transducer on the skin may affect the results. To reduce such variability, both very high and low pressure was avoided as proposed by Itoh et al. [29] and visual feedback of the applied pressure was provided so that it could be constantly controlled by the experienced operator.

Furthermore, strain ratio employed in this study offers a measure of elasticity provided by a transverse compression force of the ultrasound probe on the tendon structure. Further research is needed to establish the relationship between strain ratio and tendon longitudinal mechanical properties.


Strain sonoelastography can detect changes in Achilles tendon elasticity between different contraction intensities. It was observed that tendon elasticity was not modified between some contraction intensities. The reduction of the strain ratio between the tendon and the reference material indicates a constant increase of tendon elasticity during contractions of increasing intensity and provides an original force-elasticity curve. Future studies, using strain sonoelastography with an external reference material, are now warranted to explore potential changes in Achilles tendon elasticity in those with tendinopathy.



Kager Fat Pad


Region of Interest



We thank the students involved in the present study at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI). We thank Emiliano Soldini for the statistical analysis.


This study was supported by the Thim van der Laan Foundation, Landquart, Switzerland.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated during this study are included in this published article. Ultrasound images of the entire sample of the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

AS, FDG, MB, DF conceived the study and contributed to the design. AS, acquired the ultrasound images. AS, CC, RC recruited the participants, performed the data analysis, helped with the interpretation of the results. All authors contributed to preparation and approval of the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Canton Ticino, conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and written informed consent forms were signed by participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, SUPSI, Stabile Piazzetta, Via Violino, 6928 Manno, Switzerland
Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Servizio di Radiologia, Ospedale Civico e Italiano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland
Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, SUPSI, Landquart, Switzerland
University College Physiotherapy, Thim van der Laan AG, Landquart, Switzerland
Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium


  1. Komi PV, Fukashiro S, Jarvinen M. Biomechanical loading of Achilles tendon during normal locomotion. Clin Sports Med. 1992;11:521–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Maffulli N. Rupture of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1019–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kjaer M. Role of extracellular matrix in adaptation of tendon and skeletal muscle to mechanical loading. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:649–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. James SL, Bates BT, Osternig LR. Injuries to runners. Am J Sports Med. 1978;6:40–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Maffulli N, Sharma P, Luscombe KL. Achilles tendinopathy: aetiology and management. J R Soc Med. 2004;97:472–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Arya S, Kulig K. Tendinopathy alters mechanical and material properties of the Achilles tendon. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010;108:670–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Aubry S, Nueffer JP, Tanter M, Becce F, Vidal C, Michel F. Viscoelasticity in Achilles tendonopathy: quantitative assessment by using real-time shear-wave elastography. Radiology. 2015;274:821–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Schneebeli A, Del Grande F, Vincenzo G, Cescon C, Clijsen R, Biordi F, Barbero M. Real-time sonoelastography using an external reference material: test-retest reliability of healthy Achilles tendons. Skelet Radiol. 2016;45:1045–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Muraki T, Ishikawa H, Morise S, Yamamoto N, Sano H, Itoi E, Izumi S. Ultrasound elastography-based assessment of the elasticity of the supraspinatus muscle and tendon during muscle contraction. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24:120–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Magnusson SP, Hansen P, Aagaard P, Brond J, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Bojsen-Moller J, Kjaer M. Differential strain patterns of the human gastrocnemius aponeurosis and free tendon, in vivo. Acta Physiol Scand. 2003;177:185–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lersch C, Grotsch A, Segesser B, Koebke J, Bruggemann GP, Potthast W. Influence of calcaneus angle and muscle forces on strain distribution in the human Achilles tendon. Clin Biomech. 2012;27(9):955–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wren TA, Yerby SA, Beaupre GS, Carter DR. Mechanical properties of the human achilles tendon. Clin Biomech. 2001;16(3):245–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004;51:396–409.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Aubry S, Risson JR, Kastler A, Barbier-Brion B, Siliman G, Runge M, Kastler B. Biomechanical properties of the calcaneal tendon in vivo assessed by transient shear wave elastography. Skelet Radiol. 2013;42:1143–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. DeWall RJ, Slane LC, Lee KS, Thelen DG. Spatial variations in Achilles tendon shear wave speed. J Biomech. 2014;47:2685–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Balaban M, Idilman IS, Ipek A, Ikiz SS, Bektaser B, Gumus M. Elastographic findings of Achilles tendons in asymptomatic professional male volleyball players. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(12):2623–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. De Zordo T, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Smekal V, Reindl M, Klauser AS. Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy Achilles tendons. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(2):W134–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Yanagisawa O, Niitsu M, Kurihara T, Fukubayashi T. Evaluation of human muscle hardness after dynamic exercise with ultrasound real-time tissue elastography: a feasibility study. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(9):815–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991;13(2):111–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yamamoto Y, Yamaguchi S, Sasho T, Fukawa T, Akatsu Y, Nagashima K, Takahashi K. Quantitative ultrasound Elastography with an acoustic coupler for Achilles tendon elasticity: measurement repeatability and normative values. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35:159–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:1435–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Havre RF, Elde E, Gilja OH, Odegaard S, Eide GE, Matre K, Nesje LB. Freehand real-time elastography: impact of scanning parameters on image quality and in vitro intra- and interobserver validations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:1638–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Busilacchi A, Olivieri M, Ulisse S, Gesuita R, Skrami E, Lording T, Fusini F, Gigante A. Real-time sonoelastography as novel follow-up method in Achilles tendon surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:2124–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Real-time ultrasound elastography of the normal Achilles tendon: reproducibility and pattern description. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:1196–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ooi CC, Schneider ME, Malliaras P, Chadwick M, Connell DA. Diagnostic performance of axial-strain sonoelastography in confirming clinically diagnosed Achilles tendinopathy: comparison with B-mode ultrasound and color Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:15–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ozturk M, Sayinbatur B. Real-time ultrasound elastography of the Achilles tendon in patients with cerebral palsy: is there a correlation between strain ratio and biomechanical indicators? J Med Ultrason (2001). 2018;45:143–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Arampatzis A, Karamanidis K, Morey-Klapsing G, De Monte G, Stafilidis S. Mechanical properties of the triceps surae tendon and aponeurosis in relation to intensity of sport activity. J Biomech. 2007;40:1946–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Bogaerts S, De Brito Carvalho C, Scheys L, Desloovere K, D’Hooge J, Maes F, Suetens P, Peers K. Evaluation of tissue displacement and regional strain in the Achilles tendon using quantitative high-frequency ultrasound. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0181364.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsumura T. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239:341–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2019