Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Exploring musculoskeletal injuries in the podiatry profession: an international cross sectional study

  • Cylie M. Williams1Email author,
  • Stefania Penkala2,
  • Peter Smith3, 4, 5,
  • Terry Haines1, 6 and
  • Kelly-Ann Bowles7
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research201710:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0185-y

Received: 16 November 2016

Accepted: 22 December 2016

Published: 11 January 2017

Abstract

Background

Workplace injury is an international costly burden. Health care workers are an essential component to managing musculoskeletal disorders, however in doing this, they may increase their own susceptibility. While there is substantial evidence about work-related musculoskeletal disorders across the health workforce, understanding risk factors in specific occupational groups, such as podiatry, is limited.

The primary aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and intensity of work related low back pain in podiatrists.

Methods

This was an international cross-sectional survey targeting podiatrists in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. The survey had two components; general demographic variables and variables relating to general musculoskeletal pain in general or podiatry work-related musculoskeletal pain. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with musculoskeletal stiffness and pain and low back pain intensity. Thematic analysis was used to group comments podiatrists made about their musculoskeletal health.

Results

There were 948 survey responses (5% of Australian, New Zealand and United Kingdom registered podiatrists). There were 719 (76%) podiatrists reporting musculoskeletal pain as a result of their work practices throughout their career. The majority of injuries reported were in the first five years of practice (n = 320, 45%). The body area reported as being the location of the most significant injury was the low back (203 of 705 responses, 29%). Being female (p < 0.001) and working in private practice (p = 0.003) was associated with musculoskeletal pain or stiffness in the past 12 months. There were no variables associated with pain or stiffness in the past four weeks. Being female was the only variable associated with higher pain (p = 0.018). There were four main themes to workplace musculoskeletal pain: 1. Organisational and procedural responses to injury, 2. Giving up work, taking time off, reducing hours, 3. Maintaining good musculoskeletal health and 4. Environmental change.

Conclusions

The postures that podiatrists hold while treating patients appear to impact on musculoskeletal pain and stiffness. Recently graduated and female podiatrists are at higher risk of injury. There is a need for the profession to consider how they move and take care of their own musculoskeletal health.

Keywords

Health workforceErgonomicsBack painMusculoskeletal disorders

Background

Workplace injury is a costly burden for both employers and employees internationally. In the United Kingdom the cost of workplace injury was estimated to be £4.9 billion in 2013/14 [1] with musculoskeletal disorders accounting for 44% of all workplace illness in this country [2]. These figures are even higher in Australia where musculoskeletal disorders account for 60% of serious workplace compensation claims [3]. Musculoskeletal disorders are one of the most expensive workplace illnesses to manage [4]. Compensation costs for work-related musculoskeletal disorders in New Zealand accounted for almost NZD$150 million between 2009 and 2010 [5], excluding the indirect costs to individuals and workplace productivity. As musculoskeletal disorders become increasingly common in the workplace [6], workplace strategic recommendations prioritise addressing these [7].

Health care workers are an essential component to managing musculoskeletal disorders, however in doing this, they may increase their own susceptibility. Workers in health and community services reported higher levels of workplace injuries than the Australian average with 77 injuries per 1000 worker in health compared to 69 injures per 1000 workers across all industries [8]. Burnout, high staff turnover rates, and poor job satisfaction have been attributed to health care workforce shortages and musculoskeletal disorders [911]. Most research has investigated work-related musculoskeletal disorders in nursing, with an emphasis on low back pain attributed to strenuous patient handling activities such as lifting [12]. Shoulder and neck pain in nursing and neck and wrist pain in dentistry [13] have also received attention in the literature.

While there is substantial evidence about work-related musculoskeletal disorders across the health workforce, understanding risk factors in specific occupational groups, such podiatry, is limited. Podiatrists have ergonomic challenges that may increase their risk of musculoskeletal pain such as working in sustained and awkward postures, performing repetitive manual skills requiring high precision, while dealing with equipment related forces and vibration [6, 1416]. The point prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in podiatry has previously been reported to be between 66 and 88% in the UK [17] and Australia [18] in samples between 32 and 347 podiatrists. In general, the expected work-related musculoskeletal disorders in podiatry practice is reported to be above the average compared to other health professionals [19].

Given the greater impact of low back problems on daily activities [18] the primary aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and intensity of work related low back pain in podiatrists. The secondary aims were to explore the factors associated with restriction in activity.

Method

Study Design

This study was an international cross-sectional survey targeting podiatrists in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. The Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee, Victoria, Australia, approved this study. (MUHREC approval – CF16/1009 – 2,016,000,538).

Participants and setting

Eligible participants were all registered podiatrists within Australia (n = 4,626) [20], New Zealand (n = 382) [21] and the United Kingdom (n = 13,111) [22]. The survey was advertised in each country at local podiatry conferences and seminars, disseminated by email flyers, newsletters and online media (Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter), through the Australian Podiatry Council, state based Australian Podiatry Associations, Podiatry NZ, and The Society of Chiropodists & Podiatrists.

Measurements

All participant data were collected via a custom-developed, self-report, online survey (Appendix 1). The survey had two components; general demographic variables and variables relating to general musculoskeletal pain in general or podiatry work-related musculoskeletal pain. General demographic variables included gender, age group, country, region of practice, recency of practice and primary work roles. Participants were also requested to identify the percentage of time they worked in each of the following workplaces: private practice, public sector (community), public sector (hospital), and non-clinical (including education, research or administrative settings).

Questions about back pain were based on a previous study which developed a consensus based back pain definition [23]. Additional questions added were based on previously published work [24] focusing on musculoskeletal disorders in physiotherapists. These questions asked podiatrists to recall over the past 12 months, the number of occasions that work related pain or injury that;
  1. 1.

    Lasted longer than seven days

     
  2. 2.

    Prevented working for more than a day

     
  3. 3.

    Affected activities of daily living

     
  4. 4.

    Resulted in a health professional consultation

     

Podiatrists were also asked to identify the body region where the most severe work- related pain was experienced, if there was a history of work related injury specific to their pain throughout their career, and the time-frame in which the injury occurred in their career.

Any podiatrists who reported any pain during their career were then asked how they dealt with work related musculoskeletal pain and if they reported this to their management. Podiatrists were asked if they had musculoskeletal pain or stiffness specifically related to their low back in the past 4 weeks and to quantify any pain experienced in the previous four weeks on an eleven-point visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0 means “no pain” and 10 means the “worst pain imaginable”. A free text box at the end of the survey prompted further information from participants by asking “If you have any comments about the questions or your responses within this survey, please add within the text box below”. To reduce missing data, a forced response was used throughout the survey and the “don’t know” option was removed.

Procedure

Following dissemination of the survey link, each participant gave consent and completed the survey online. The survey was open from the 13th of April, 2016 to the 28th of July, 2016. There was regular advertising of the survey via the same modalities as outlined in the original survey dissemination above and all podiatrists were encouraged to share the advertisement with fellow podiatrists via their networks.

The responses were collected using SurveyMonkey® online survey software (Additional file 1) [25] and utilized skip logic when podiatrists indicated no musculoskeletal pain or stiffness relating to their job role. The survey was set to ensure internal fidelity of each section with the participant not able to continue the survey without full completion of the previous section. The participants were able to withdraw from the survey at any time by closing the browser and any non-completion was treated as missing data for the remaining non-completed variables.

Analysis

Data were analysed using Stata 13 [26]. Descriptive statistics were used to report on the distribution of each variable. Univariate regression analyses were used to identify candidate variables for inclusion in the definitive multivariable model. Only variables that had a univariate association with the dependent variable were considered where the p-value was 0.10 or less for inclusion in the preliminary multivariable model. This preliminary multivariable model was then reduced by removing variables one-at-a-time based on the variable with the highest adjusted p-value. This continued until all variables remaining in the multivariable model had an adjusted p-value of less than 0.05. This final model was referred to as the definitive multivariable model. Only data was used data from respondents where all questions had been answered (complete case analysis). Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify factors independently associated with the dichotomous response of musculoskeletal pain or stiffness within the past 12 months, low back pain within the past four weeks and and continuous outcome ranging from 0 to 10 for low back pain intensity, where 10 equals maximum pain. For participants who had no pain and skipped this question, their response was allocated 0 during analysis of continuous outcomes. The model predictor variables included gender, age, percentage of time at private practice, public sector community health, public sector acute and non-clinical, the recency of practice and workload.

Inductive thematic analysis of the open text questions was undertaken by hand. Inductive thematic analysis allows for the content of statements to be analysed in full and where concepts or categories can be derived from the data in an inductive manner [27]. In this analysis, themes were generated from the statements as opposed to themes being developed by the investigators [27]. The full statements were manually grouped against meaningful concepts. These concepts were reviewed with themes developed. Even if a theme was addressed in one sentence, the statement was included under that theme. The analysis also took an iterative approach where as new themes were developed, earlier statements were recoded.

Results

Following removal of consent only responses, there were 948 survey responses (5% of Australian, New Zealand and United Kingdom registered podiatrists). Table 1 displays a breakdown of the demographics of participants taking into account missing data from non-completion due to early exit from the survey. Table 1 also gives the demographic breakdown based on individual country responses, Australia (n = 652, 14% responses from 4626 podiatrists), New Zealand (n = 40, 10% of 382 registered podiatrists), United Kingdom (n = 256, 2% of 13,111 registered podiatrists).
Table 1

Demographics of participants n (%)

 

Total responses n = 948

Australia n = 652, 69% of total responses

New Zealand n = 40, 4% of total responses

United Kingdom N = 256, 27% of total responses

n (%) or Mean (SD)

n (%) or Mean (SD)

n (%) or Mean (SD)

n (%) or Mean (SD)

Gender

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

 Male

275 (29)

198 (30)

6 (15)

71 (28)

 Female

670 (71)

451 (69)

34 (85)

185 (72)

 Prefer not to answer

1 (0)

1 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Intersex

2 (0)

2 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Age group

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

 Under 25

65 (7)

48 (7)

6 (15)

11 (4)

 25 - 29

188 (20)

156 (24)

6 (15)

26 (10)

 30 – 34

145 (15)

111 (72)

7 (18)

27 (11)

 35 – 39

119 (13)

78 (12)

3 (8)

38 (15)

 40 – 44

126 (13)

72 (11)

6 (15)

48 (19)

 45 – 49

115 (12)

72 (11)

2 (5)

41 (16)

 50 – 54

107 (11)

65 (10)

7 (18)

35 (14)

 55 – 59

61 (6)

37 (6)

2 (5)

22 (9)

 60 – 64

17 (2)

11 (2)

1 (3)

5 (2)

 65 – 79

4 (0)

2 (0)

0 (0)

2 (1)

 80+

1 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Workload

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

 Full time

554 (59)

381 (58)

22 (55)

151 (59)

 3-4 days

276 (42)

178 (27)

13 (33)

85 (33)

 2 days or less

105 (16)

83 (12)

5 (13)

17 (7)

 Do not currently practice as a podiatrist

12 (1)

10 (2)

0 (0)

2 (1)

Working environment

Mean % of time

Mean % of time (SD)

Mean % of time (SD)

Mean % of time (SD)

 Public sector (hospital)

(SD)

45 (40)

8 (24)

21 (28)

 Public sector (community)

34 (38)

54 (36)

26 (29)

72 (33)

 Private Practice

60 (37)

82 (29)

80 (24)

68 (38)

 Non-clinical

78 (31)

33 (30)

14 (16)

22 (21)

 Do not currently practice as a podiatrist

29 (28) 16 (37)

20 (41)

0 (0)

13 (34)

Years of practice

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

 0–5

242 (26)

178 (27)

10 (25)

54 (21)

 6–10

202 (21)

149 (23)

11 (28)

42 (16)

 11–15

148 (16)

93 (14)

6 (15)

49 (10)

 15+

355 (37)

232 (36)

13 (33)

110 (43)

Primary work role

Total responses=

Total responses = 824

Total responses =52

Total responses: 324

 Patient/Client podiatry service provision

1198

595 (72)

38 (73)

239 (74)

 Supervision or mentor of other podiatrists

874 (73)

87 (11)

6 (12)

35 (11)

 Manager/Team leader of other podiatrists

125 (10)

84 (10)

4 (8)

30 (9)

 Administration only within podiatry (includes research/education)

120 (10)

66 (6)

43 (5)

4 (8)

15 (5)

 Do not currently practice as a podiatrist

 

5 (1)

0

2 (1)

 Other

8 (1)

5 (0)

10 (1)

0

3 (1)

Overall from the 948 podiatrists who responded, 719 (76%) reported musculoskeletal pain as a result of their work practices throughout their career. Of the 705 responses that indicated the area of most significant injury, 29% reported the low back as the area of most significant injury (n = 203). Table 2 provides a breakdown of the body region of most significant injury (also found in Fig. 1), age at the time of injury, stage in career, changes in practice and if the problem was reported to a manager or supervisor. Of the total number of significant injuries, 533 (75%) changed their practice as a result of the injury however only 408 (58%) reported this injury to a supervisor or manager.
Table 2

Body Region of most significant injury throughout career

 

Distribution of injuries across body

Age at Injurya

Career stage of Injuryb

Change practiceb

Reported injury to management**

 

Under 25

25-34

35-44

45-54

55-64

During training

First 5 years of practice

6-10 years of practice

11 to 15 years of practice

15+ after graduating

Yes

No

Yes

No

All regions (n, %)

705 (100%)

131 (1%)

313 (44%)

139 (2%)

98 (14%)

24 (3%)

12 (2%)

320 (45%)

179 (25%)

70 (10%)

119 (17%)

533 (75%)

171 (24%)

274 (39%)

408 (58%)

Low back

203 (29%)

44 (22%)

97 (48%)

45 (22%)

14 (7%)

3 (1%)

5 (2%)

107 (53%)

46 (23%)

17 (8%)

26 (13%)

168 (83%)

35 (17%)

84 (41%)

111 (55%)

Neck

135 (19%)

18 (13%)

66 (49%)

25 (19%)

18 (13%)

8 (6%)

1 (1%)

54 (40%)

41 (30%)

20 (15%)

19 (14%)

102 (76%)

33 (24%)

50 (37%)

82 (61%)

Upper back

102 (15%)

22 (21%)

53 (52%)

14 (14%)

12 (12%)

1 (1%)

1 (1%)

50 (48%)

31 (30%)

6 (7%)

13 (13%)

73 (72%)

29 (28%)

26 (25%)

76 (75%)

Hands, thumbs, wrist

51 (7%)

5 (10%)

17 (33%)

10 (20%)

13 (25%)

6 (12%)

1 (2%)

18 (35%)

8 (17%)

7 (14%)

17 (33%)

34 (67%)

17 (33%)

18 (35%)

29 (57%)

Shoulders

69 (10%)

9 (13%)

30 (45%)

15 (22%)

13 (19%)

2 (3%)

1 (1%)

28 (41%)

20 (29%)

6 (9%)

13 (19%)

49 (71%)

20 (29%)

24 (35%)

42 (61%)

Elbow/Forearms

112 (16%)

30 (27%)

40 (36%)

20 (18%)

19 (17%)

3 (3%)

3 (3%)

53 (47%)

24 (21%)

8 (7%)

23 (21%)

80 (71%)

32 (29%)

60 (53%)

49 (44%)

Knees

5 (1%)

0 (0%)

1 (20%)

3 (60%)

1 (20%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (40%)

2 (40%)

1 (20%)

0 (0%)

5 (100%)

0 (0%)

3 (60%)

2 (40%)

Hip/Thigh

16 (2%)

1 (6%)

5 (31%)

4 (25%)

5 (31%)

1 (6%)

0 (0%)

4 (25%)

4 (25%)

2 (12%)

6 (38%)

14 (88%)

2 (12%)

5 (31%)

10 (63%)

Other

12 (1%)

2 (17%)

4 (33%)

3 (25%)

3 (25%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

4 (33%)

3 (25%)

3 (25%)

2 (17%)

8 (67%)

3 (25%)

4 (33%)

7 (58%)

aNo injuries reported over 64 years

bMissing data responses from drop outs

Fig. 1

Body Region of most significant injury (n = 705)

Of the problems experienced by podiatrists over the last 12 months lasting longer than 7 days, more occasions of musculoskeletal pain or stiffness, of either single or constant episodes, occurred in the shoulders (Median = 1, IQR 0,5), neck (Median = 2, IQR = 1,6) and upper back (Median = 1, IQR = 0,5) and low back (Median = 2, IQR 1,5) (Table 3). There were very few occurrences where a podiatrist took more than a day off for musculoskeletal pain in the past twelve months. Occasions of pain or stiffness at the low back impacted activities of daily living more than any other body part (Median = 1, IQR = 0,2) (Table 3). Only one participant reported low back pain constantly impacted activities of daily living, all other participants reported a range of occasions between 0–25 in the past 12 months. Podiatrists regularly sought support from health care professionals (Table 3). Podiatrists presented for health professional support more frequently for pain or stiffness at the neck (Median = 2, IQR = 1,4), low back (Median = 1, IQR = 1,3) or upper back pain (Median = 1, IQR = 0,4) than any other body part. It is unknown if these appointments were in clusters (i.e. seeing a clinician every week day for a time period of acute pain) or if regular bi-weekly, weekly or monthly appointments.
Table 3

Impact and results of occasions of pain at body regions

 

Lasted longer than 7 days

Prevented work for >1 day

Affecting ADLs

Saw health professional

 

Median, (IQR)

N, Range

Median, (IQR)

N, Range

Median, (IQR)

N, Range

Median, (IQR)

N, Range

Low back

2 (1,5)

400, 0-365

0, (0,1)

243, 0-30

1, (0,2)

251, 0-365

1, (1,3)

346, 0-150

Neck

2 (1,6)

404, 0-365

0, (0,1)

219, 0-50

0, (0,1)

225, 0-30

2, (1,4)

337, 0-150

Upper back

1, (0,5)

296, 0-365

0, (0,0)

168, 0-30

0, (0,1)

183, 0-100

1, (0,4)

265, 0-60

Hands, thumbs, wrist

1, (1,5)

339, 0-365

0, (0,0)

178, 0-30

0,(0–1)

186, 0-100

0, (0,2)

220, 0-30

Shoulders

1 (1,5)

270, 0-365

0, (0,0)

163, 0-100

0, (0,1)

170, 0-100

1 (0,3)

230, 0-100

Elbow/Forearms

1, (0,3)

206, 0-365

0, (0,0)

149, 0-15

0, (0,0)

150, 0-20

0, (0,1)

177, 0-50

Knees

0, (0–1)

159, 0-365

0, (0,0)

142, 0-42

0, (0,0)

136, 0-42

0, (0,0)

138, 0-150

Hip/Thigh

0, (0–2)

175, 0-365

0, (0,0)

151, 0-5

0, (0,0)

147, 0-18

0, (0,1)

160, 0-150

Feet/ankles

0, (0,1)

148, 0-365

0, (0,0)

143, 0-21

0, (0,0)

136, 0-21

0, (0,0)

132, 0-15

Of the 719 podiatrists reporting work-related musculoskeletal pain during their career, 427 (59%) reported low back pain in the past four weeks with a mean (SD) visual analogue score of 3.8 (1.9) on a scale of 0 to 10. Being female (p < 0.001) and working in private practice (p = 0.003) was associated with musculoskeletal pain or stiffness in the past 12 months (Table 4). There were no variables associated with pain or stiffness in the past four weeks. Being female was the only variable associated with higher pain (p = 0.018) (Table 4).
Table 4

Variables associated with greater frequencies or intensity of pain or stiffness over time determined through multivariable analysis

 

n (%)

Gender (Female) Odds Ratio (95% CI), p

Private Practice Odds Ratio (95% CI), p

Musculoskeletal stiffness, pain or injury in past 12 months

653 of 901 responses (72%)

2.16 [1.52, 3.08], <0.001

1.01 [1.00, 1.01], 0.003

Low back pain or stiffness in past 4 weeksa

427 of 865 responses (49%)a

  

Low back pain as measured with the VASb

948 of 948 responses (100%)a

1.48 [1.07, 2.01], 0.018

 

aNo variables associated

bWhere no musculoskeletal pain was recorded from podiatrists, a 0 was allocated within analysis

There were four main themes identified from the 99 comments from podiatrists at the end of the survey.
  1. 1.

    Organisational and procedural responses to injury

    There were few positive comments in relation to the impact and responses of employers and how they deal with work health and safety issues raised by employees. Responses such as “I’ve found working for a small business often means less OHS [Occupational Health and Safety] awareness for staff, compared to the hospital system” (29) and “My neck problems never materialised before I started working as a podiatrist \and the NHS [National Health Service] Occupational Health were quick to inform me that it was not as a result of work related problems” (35), highlighted these challenges. Podiatrists also reported inaction by management, saying “[I] Raised concerns with management when floor issue was initially noted, but no action. Proceeded to complete incident form when back pain occurredcurrently waiting on ergonomic assessment and not working at that site in the meantime” (18).

     
  2. 2.

    Giving up work, taking time off, reducing hours

    There were numerous comments about how podiatrists reduced hours and/or changed client types to manage the impact of musculoskeletal pain, including giving up work in the profession altogether. These comments appeared to greatly impact health related quality of life as a result of constant pain, and the need to pursue other avenues of income. One podiatrist reported “My pains have led me having to stop practicing. It has been 8 years and am relying on long term pain relief/pain management. Had several referrals to rheumatologists, physios and been told I just have to live with it” (38), and another, “I am at 6.5 years [recency of practice] and 28 years old and I dont see myself being able to sustain thisconstantpodiatry general treatments for much longer (maybe another 5 years or so)” (79). It appeared that this was a challenge right from being a newly qualified podiatrists with statements such as “As a new grad you did whatever work you were asked to do, and often worked in much busier clinics […] An older, experienced podiatrist is more likely to work with more complex clients and therefore more time to treat less and less patients per day” (62). Podiatrists who worked in private practice also comment about the nature of their work making it extremely difficult to take time off. “When youre self-employed you cant take time off even if in pain” (32).

     
  3. 3.

    Maintaining good musculoskeletal health

    Many podiatrists were reflective on what they wish they knew as a new graduate and what they were doing to maintain and minimise the impact of the job on their bodies. One podiatrist stated “I became a moving and handling advisor due to many musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders related to podiatry […] With my new role I provide advice to podiatry staff re ways to reduce MSK [musculoskeletal] disorders” (34). Another reflected that “I wish I had known the shocking impact of Podiatry on my upper back and neck […] People need to be aware of these factors before working as a podiatrist” (27).

    There were concerns that constant pain was difficult to manage and a frustration of being reliant on pharmaceuticals, surgery, or other direct intervention as a result of their chosen profession. “I live with constant neck and back pain. Its become part of everyday life as a podiatrist” (89), “My thumb, wrist and forearm injuries are caused by two incidents involving patient care that I am awaiting surgery to resolve” (42) and “My back pain got so bad I was seeing a chiro [chiropractor] one week, the physio the next, then the sport massage the following week” (85) were all examples of self -management strategies.

     
  4. 4.

    Environmental changes

    Podiatrists reported using their office equipment such as specific seats, made regular postural adjustments while treatment and participated in regular exercise as a way to minimise musculoskeletal pain. Interestingly, there were a number of comments regarding the use of practitioners seating that is common to the profession, for example “I stopped using the saddle chair and my symptoms of pain settled and the sharp tendinitis morning pain was eliminated within 3 months. I still try and sit and stand 50/50, however I am quite certain the saddle chair was the reason for my shoulder pain” (79). Proactive self-care strategies included “Going to the gym and becoming very fit, working on my core strength has made a huge difference to back problems Ive had in the past” (74).

     

Discussion

The aim of this project was to establish a prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries amongst podiatrist in Australia, New Zealand and the UK. This research also aimed to identify which body sites were most problematic for podiatrist and had a greater effect on the professional practice and life outside of work. These results indicate that 76% of podiatrists had experienced musculoskeletal pain attributed to work during their career, with pain and/or injury to the low back the most common site to negatively affect work and outside life.

Similar small studies of the podiatry profession in the UK, Australia and Spain found up to 20% of musculoskeletal injuries within a 12 month period specific to the low back, neck, upper back, wrist and hands [18, 28, 29]. While low back problems in these studies were only around half the prevalence in dental and nursing practice [12, 30], two other podiatry studies [28, 19] reported a higher prevalence of low back problems in a one to seven day capture period. Importantly, multiple sites of work-related musculoskeletal injuries are reported at the one time [17, 18]. The last survey of podiatrists in Australia, found 88% (n = 304) of podiatrists reporting a musculoskeletal injuries within the last 12 months, and that on average three areas of the body were affected at the same time [18].

Similar to the dental profession, females reported more frequent and a higher intensity of pain [31]. This may be due to the similarities in sitting postures between the professions as the same was not found in the physiotherapy profession [32]. In population studies, older females have also reported more frequent or more intense back pain [33]. It is possible that this finding in podiatry is representative of the population as a whole.

Other studies have reported seeking treatment for neck pain was the most common site, followed by the shoulders, upper and low back [18]. In contrast to previous work [18], this survey of podiatrists determined that low back problems were more likely to affect daily activities followed by the neck, wrists and hands, shoulders and upper back . It is possible that there is a level of under-reporting to management or over-reporting in surveys due to response bias. This present research also did not ask podiatrists to identify if they worked as sole practitioners, therefore the under reporting of injuries may simply be a result of having no manager to report to. A previous study reporting interviews with seven podiatrists indicated podiatrists had a tendency to persevere with musculoskeletal disorders and associated pain and dysfunction in the hands rather than taking time off ‘as you dont want to let anyone down’ [16].

Recently graduated podiatrists may work in postures that result in increased susceptibility to musculoskeletal injury. Forty-five percent of the respondents experienced the most serious injury in the five years post training. Participants reported that the most frequent time-frame where injury occurred, regardless of which body site, was the first five years of working. This research is consistent with previous results from other health disciplines, with Glover et al. [24] identifying five years post-graduation as the most at risk time-point to experience a serious musculoskeletal injury.

Previous research has proposed that the true impact of musculoskeletal injury amongst health care professionals is hidden as result of the tendency to informally seek treatment from a colleague, and as many as 1 in 6 leave the profession due to injury [34]. The results have identified that 75% of respondents with an injury did have to change the way they practised and 58% did not report the injury to a manager. These results support anecdotal belief that health professionals do not report musculoskeletal pain and injuries to managers as they do not want this to affect career prospects. It should be noted that some health professionals do work as private consultants and do not have a manager to report to, however these results did show that reporting of injuries to available managers was still low. As it is suggested that it costs approximately $40,000 to train a podiatrist in Australia [35, 36, 37], the profession needs to ensure that mechanisms are put into place so that health professionals can enjoy their career to their full potential. This could include identifying the risk factors that can lead to a musculoskeletal injury, and ensuring that support is available for injured workers.

This was the largest self report of musculoskeletal disorders in the podiatry profession however the sample size is still a limitation of the study and its generalizability to the rest of the profession. This sample size represents 5% of the podiatry profession across Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. While this is a low response rate, a reasonable variation in the sample was observed across the different outcomes and predictor variables. As such, while this limits in the ability to accurately describe the true prevalence of pain in the podiatry profession as a whole, there is still the ability to examine the relationships between variables, such as the distribution of pain across body parts, or the predictors of different pain outcomes, as these estimates do not necessarily require representative samples [37, 38]. There was potential for an over reporting of pain due to self selection bias. It is postulated that podiatrists who had pain were more likely to respond to the survey due to an eagerness to share their experience. This has some potential to limit the generalizability of the results to the whole profession however the results are in line with other similar studies. Longitudinal studies of podiatrists throughout their career are needed to better understand the development of any musculoskeletal impacts. Real time monitoring of postures may also improve understanding of the mechanism of pain or stiffness. Universities should also consider how treating postures are taught to student podiatrists and embed good postural habits at the beginning of their career.

Conclusion

The postures that podiatrists hold while treating patients may impact on musculoskeletal pain and stiffness. This pain and stiffness can impact on activities of daily living and cause podiatrists to change work practices. Podiatrists reported more injuries at the beginning of the careers. Universities training podiatrists and employers of recently graduated podiatrist should especially be aware of treatment environments and case-loads that may predispose podiatrists to more injuries. There is a need for the profession to consider how they move and take care of their own musculoskeletal health.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Jessica Kaplonyi for assistance with manuscript preparation and qualitative data analysis. The Australian Podiatry Council, all Australian Podiatry Associations, Podiatry NZ and the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists for promotion and distribution of the survey to members.

Funding

Terry Haines is supported by a NHMRC Career Development Fellowship. Peter Smith is supported by a Research Chair in Gender, Work & Health from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Availability of data and materials

All data sets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

CW and KAB conceived and designed the study. All authors contributed to the survey design, data collection, interpretation of the data and development of the manuscript. All authors approved the current manuscript version of the manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

No applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee, Victoria, Australia, approved this study. (MUHREC approval – CF16/1009 - 2,016,000,538). All participants consented to participate prior to data collection..

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University
(2)
University of Western Sydney, School of Science and Health
(3)
Monash University, Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine
(4)
Institute for Work & Health
(5)
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
(6)
Monash Health, Allied Health Research Unit
(7)
Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University

References

  1. Health and Saftey Executive, Costs to Britain of workplace fatalities and self-reported injuries and ill health, 2013/14, http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/cost.htm Accessed 1 Oct 2016.
  2. Health and Saftey Executive, Work-related musculoskelatal disorder (WRMSD) statistics Great Britian 2015, http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/ Accessed 25 Aug 2016
  3. Safe Work Australia. Statistics on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders. Canberra: Safe Work; 2016.Google Scholar
  4. Oakman J, Chan S. Risk management: Where should we target strategies to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders? Saf Sci. 2015;73:99–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Beven S, Gunning N, Thomas R. Fit For Work? Musculoskeletal Disorders and the New Zealand Labour Market, The Work Foundation. http://www.arthritis.org.nz/pdfs/fitforwork.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2016.
  6. Widanarko B, Legg S, Devereux J, Stevenson M. The combined effect of physical, psychosocial/organisational and/or environmental risk factors on the presence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms and its consequences. Appl Ergon. 2014;45:1610–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Safe Work Australia. Australian Work Health and Safety Strategy 2012–2022. Canberra: Safe Work; 2012.Google Scholar
  8. Safe Work Australia. Work-related injuries in Australia, 2005–06. Health and community services Industry. Canberra: Safe Work; 2009.Google Scholar
  9. Brewer CS, Kovner CT, Greene W, Tukov-Shuser M, Djukic M. Predictors of actual turnover in a national sample of newly licensed registered nurses employed in hospitals. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68:521–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. McCaughey D, Kimmel A, Savage G, Lukas T, Walsh E, Halbesleben J. Antecedents to workplace injury in the health care industry: A synthesis of the literature. Health Care Manage Rev. 2016;41:42–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Long MH, Johnston V, Bogossian F. Work-related upper quadrant musculoskeletal disorders in midwives, nurses and physicians: A systematic review of risk factors and functional consequences. Appl Ergon. 2012;43:455–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis KG, Kotowski SE. Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders for Nurses in Hospitals, Long-Term Care Facilities, and Home Health Care: A Comprehensive Review. Hum Factors. 2015;57:754–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Occhionero V, Korpinen L, Gobba F. Upper limb musculoskeletal disorders in healthcare personnel. Ergonomics. 2014;57:1166–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Feng B, Liang Q, Wang Y, Andersen LL, Szeto G. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms of the neck and upper extremity among dentists in China. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006451.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Birtles M, Leah C: Musculoskeletal Disorders in Podiatry & Chiropody Professionals. pp. 1–39: Health and Safety Laboratory; 2006:1–39.Google Scholar
  16. Halford V, Birch I. The Perceived causes of hand pain in podiatrists. Aust J Pod Med. 2005;39:57–63.Google Scholar
  17. Layzell P. Out on a limb. Occup Health. 2003;55:24–7.Google Scholar
  18. Psihramis D, Penkala S, Bowles P. The Epidemiology of podiatry work related musculoskeletal complaints in New South Wales. In: 21st Australian Podiatry Council National Conference. Christchurch: Australasian Podiatry Council; 2005.Google Scholar
  19. Leah C, Birtles M, Musculoskeletal disorders in podiatry and chiropody professionals, http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr647.pdf, Accessed 26 Aug 2016
  20. Podiatry Board of Australia. Podiatry Registrant Data: March 2016. Melbourne: Podiatry Board of Australia; 2016.Google Scholar
  21. Podiatrists Board of New Zealand. Annual Report, 1 April 2015–31 March 2015. 2015.Google Scholar
  22. Health and Care Professions Council, Chiropodists/podiatrists, http://www.hcpc-uk.org/aboutregistration/professions/index.asp?id=3 - profDetails, Accessed 21 Aug 2016
  23. Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR, Nachemson AL, Buchbinder R, Walker BF, Wyatt M, Cassidy JD, Rossignol M, Leboeuf-Yde C, et al. A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine. 2008;33:95–103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Glover W, McGregor A, Sullivan C, Hague J. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders affecting members of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Physiother. 2005;91:138–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Inc SM. Palo Alto. USA: California; 2016.Google Scholar
  26. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. vol. 11. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2013.Google Scholar
  27. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Iglesias LME, De Bengoa Vallejo BR, Fuentes SP. Self-reported musculoskeletal disorders in podiatrists at work. Med Lav. 2011;102:502–10.Google Scholar
  29. Shaw C, Shaw T, Bowden P. Study to determine the incidence of musculoskelatal complaints amongst podiatry students at Salford Univeristy. Br J Pod. 2001;4:120–3.Google Scholar
  30. Ayers KMS, Thomson WM, Newton JT, Morgaine KC, Rich AM. Self-reported occupational health of general dental practitioners. Occup Med. 2009;59:142–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hayes M, Cockrell D, Smith D. A systematic review of musculoskeletal disorders among dental professionals. Int J Dent Hyg. 2009;7:159–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Salik Y, Özcan A. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a survey of physical therapists in Izmir-Turkey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004;5:1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Vos T, Buchbinder R. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2028–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Glover W. Work-related Strain Injuries in Physiotherapists: Prevalence and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders. Physiother. 2002;88:364–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. La Trobe Univerity, Podiatry, http://www.latrobe.edu.au/courses/podiatry, Accessed 16 Dec 2016
  36. Charles Sturt University, Commonwealth supported places, http://www.csu.edu.au/courses/fees-and-costs/commonwealth-supported-places, Accessed 16 Dec2016
  37. Rothman KJ, Gallacher JE, Hatch EE. Why representativeness should be avoided. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1012–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G. Commentary: Should we always deliberately be non-representative? Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1022–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement