Volume 7 Supplement 1

4th Congress of the International Foot and Ankle Biomechanics Community

Open Access

Mechanical variations induce by foot orthoses on calcaneal fracture

  • T Breard1, 2, 3 and
  • M Janin1, 2
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20147(Suppl 1):A9

https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-S1-A9

Published: 8 April 2014

This work is meant to quantify the benefits of the foot orthoses [1, 2] through the clinical case of a female patient aged 67 who broke her right calcaneum.

To investigate this, we implemented three experiments commonly used during podiatric examinations to assess walking parameters: the passive antepulsion test, the stabilo-baro-podometrie analysis [3, 4] and the Latero-Medial Index, measures taken immediately (T0) and after 16 days (T16) wearing plantar orthotics. (figure 1) Foot orthoses, deduced after clinical examination and quantitative analysis of walking, are molded, wisch are supplemented by the addition of specific low stimulations. The results clearly show the benefits on stability. The foot orthoses allows the patient to recover the normal use of the ankle thanks to the positive effects on support and movement of a fractured foot [5]. Therefore, the foot orthoses tends to improve the balance of the fractured foot. Moreover, these positive effects are persistent throughout the time.
Figure 1

T0, Force Cuves without foot orthose. Left/Right and T16, Force Cuves without foot orthoses. Left/right

In a latter phase, the adjustments carried out on the foot orthoses that modify the foot simulation [3, 4], result in the improvement of the assessed parameters (static and dynamic). These variations tend to prove the benefits of the foot orthoses and justify the podiatric approach developed on this clinical case.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Applied Podiatry College
(2)
Podiatrist, PhD, Clinic
(3)
Maison médical de Roaillan

References

  1. Murley GS, Landorf KB, Menz HB: Do foot orthoses change lower limb muscle activity in flat-arched feet towards a pattern observed in normal-arched feet?. Clin Biomech. 2010, 25: 728-736. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.05.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Murley GS, Landorf KB, Menz HB, Bird AR: Effect of foot posture, foot orthoses and footwear on lower limb muscle activity during walking and running: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2009, 29: 172-87. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.08.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW: Use of plantar contact area to predict medial longitudinal arch height during walking. JAMPA. 2006, 96: 489-494.Google Scholar
  4. Wong L, Hunt A, Burns J, Crosbie J: Effect of foot morphology on center-of-pressure excursion during barefoot walking. JAPMA. 2008, 98: 112-127.Google Scholar
  5. Gillespie WJ, Gillespie LD, Paker MJ: Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in older people. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010, 6 (10): CD001255-Google Scholar
  6. Janin M, Dupui P: The effects of unilateral medial arch support stimulation on plantar pressure and center of pressure adjustment in young gymnasts. Neuroscience Letters. 2009, 461: 245-248. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Janin M, Toussaint L: Change in center of pressure with stimulations via anterior orthotic devices. Gait Posture. 2005, 21: 1.S79-View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Breard and Janin; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement