Volume 7 Supplement 1

4th Congress of the International Foot and Ankle Biomechanics Community

Open Access

Gender differences in segmental foot motions during gait using 3D multi-segment foot model

  • Sang Gyo Seo1Email author,
  • Dong Yeon Lee1,
  • Ji-Beom Kim1,
  • Seong Hyun Kim1,
  • Hye Sun Park1,
  • Hyo Jeong Yoo1,
  • Sung Ju Kim2,
  • Jihyeung Kim3,
  • Kyoung Min Lee4,
  • Chin Youb Chung4 and
  • In Ho Choi1
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20147(Suppl 1):A75

https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-S1-A75

Published: 8 April 2014

There might be gender differences in segmental foot motion considering the gender differences in the foot shape and the prevalence of pathologies [1, 2]. The objectives of this study were 1) to obtain reference data of segmental motion of the foot using a multi-segment foot model (MFM) with 15-marker set from healthy adults; 2) to find gender differences in segmental foot motion during gait. One hundred feet of 100 healthy adults (50 males, 50 females) with 20-35 years old were tested by Cleveland Clinic marker set and six additional foot markers. We presented demographic data of participating subjects. Females were shorter, both in height and length. Hallux valgus angle on static status was significantly higher in female. Talo-1st metatarsal angle was not significantly different. The cadence (steps/min) was significantly more frequent in female than in male. The stride length, the step width, and the step time were significantly longer in male. The speed and the proportion of stance phase were not significantly different (Table 1). The range of segmental motion (hallux, forefoot, hindfoot) and arch data were recorded during the gait and compared between male and female. The both genders had similar patterns of segmental foot motions. The range of sagittal motion and coronal angulation of the hallux was greater during gait in females. The range of motion on the hindfoot was also greater in females. The male had higher adjusted arch height and arch index. However, the range of adjusted arch height was larger in females (Figure 1). We demonstrated that there was a substantial temporal pattern of the foot segmental motion in normal adults. We also presented that there was a significant gender difference the motion of specific foot segment. We believe that data from this study might be used as a reference data to evaluate the effect of certain condition on the segmental motion of the foot and to reveal the gender difference in prevalence and prognosis of foot and ankle pathologies.
Table 1

Basic gait parameters

 

Male (mean ± SD)

Female (mean ± SD)

p- value

Cadence (cm)

110.3 ± 5.7

116.4 ± 6.5

< 0.001

Speed (cm/sec)

123.3± 8.9

124.9± 7.5

0.445

Stride length (cm)

133.9± 7.3

128.3± 7.1

< 0.001

Step width (cm)

66.9 ± 3.7

64.1 ± 3.6

< 0.001

Proportion of stance phase (%)

59.7 ± 1.2

59.3 ± 0.8

0.123

Figure 1

Comparison of the mean foot segmental motion between two genders. The both gender had similar patterns of segmental foot motions in spite of the gender differences in the specific motion of some segments.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital
(2)
Department of statistics, Korea University
(3)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center
(4)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

References

  1. Cho SH, Park JM, Kwon OY: Gender differences in three dimensional gait analysis data from 98 healthy Korean adults. Clin Biomech. 2004, Bristol, Avon, 19 (2): 145-152. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.10.003.Google Scholar
  2. Murray MP, Kory RC, Sepic SB: Walking patterns of normal women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970, 51 (11): 637-650.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Seo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement