Volume 7 Supplement 1

4th Congress of the International Foot and Ankle Biomechanics Community

Open Access

Effects of plantar fascia on first metatarsophalangeal joint stress in different foot types

  • Rajshree Mootanah1, 4Email author,
  • Khadija Saoudi2,
  • Joel Mazella3,
  • Antoine Truchetet2,
  • Jonathan Deland4,
  • Scott Ellis4,
  • Josh Baxter4 and
  • Howard J Hillstrom4, 1
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20147(Suppl 1):A58


Published: 8 April 2014

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause of disability in older adults [1] and 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) OA, is the most common form of OA in the foot [2]. Many foot pathologies are of a biomechanical nature and often associated with one foot type over another [3, 4]. OA is postulated to result from elevated joint stress. However, the link between stress distribution in the 1st MTPJ and different foot types is not well understood. Furthermore the tension band effect of the plantar fascia upon 1st MTP joint function is also not well understood.

A high resolution 7 Tesla MRI was used to create a geometrically accurate 3D model of the 1st MTPJ using Mimics v14 imaging software. To simulate rectus, planus and cavus feet, 1st metatarsal declination angles of 20.2°, 10.1° and 30.7° were constructed. Plantar fascia material properties were altered. Physiological material properties and boundary conditions were applied to solve for stress, using ABAQUS. The ligaments were simulated by linear spring elements. The base of the first metatarsal bone was mechanically grounded in this model. Plantar loading conditions were applied, based on plantar pressure data collected from different foot types.

Results of our static 3D FE model (Figure 1) during mid-stance of gait showed peak stresses in the distal 1st MTPJ cartilage of 0.61 MPa, 0.97 MPa and 1.10 MPa for the rectus, cavus and planus foot type, respectively (Figure 1). First MTP joint stress is largest for planus and cavus foot types and least for well-aligned rectus feet. Global foot alignment affected the magnitude and location of peak stress within the joint. Peak stress decreases as the k increases suggesting that the plantar fascia plays an important ‘tension band’ effect (Figure 2). Future research should develop methods of tuning plantar fascia material properties to represent a specific patient.
Figure 1

1st MTPJ stress a) rectus, b) planus, and c) cavus foot types

Figure 2

Fascia stiffness effects



This work was in part supported by an NIH grant 1R03HD053135-01.

Authors’ Affiliations

Anglia Ruskin University
Universite de Lorraine
Ecole des mines d'Albi-Carmaux
Hospital for Special Surgery


  1. CDC: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007, 56 (01): 4-7.Google Scholar
  2. Horton GA, et al: Foot Ankle Int. 1999, 20 (12): 777-80. 10.1177/107110079902001204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ledoux WR, et al: Foot Ankle Int. 2003, 24 (11): 845-850.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sugathan HK, Sherlock DA: J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009, 48 (6): 637-641. 10.1053/j.jfas.2009.07.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheung JT, Zhang M, An KN: Clin Biomech. 2004, Bristol, Avon, 19 (8): 839-46. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.06.002.Google Scholar
  6. Rao S, Song J, Kraszewski A, et al: Gait Posture. 2011, 34 (1): 131-7. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.028.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Mootanah et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.