Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Meeting abstract
  • Open Access

Preliminary model-based validation of a biplane fluoroscopy system

  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 1, 4 and
  • 1, 2, 4
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20147 (Suppl 1) :A53

https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-S1-A53

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Root Mean Square
  • Compute Tomography Data
  • Joint Kinematic
  • Motion Capture System
  • 100Hz Sampling

Background

Biplane fluoroscopy can directly track the motion of bones and therefore measure joint kinematics. Our prior marker-based work has demonstrated the ability of our system to accurately and precisely track the motion of known objects (i.e., tantalum beads) [1]. In this study, we present the preliminary bone-based validation of our system by tracking the bones of the foot from cadaveric specimens.

Methods

Six bones (two each: calcaneus, talus and first metatarsal) were harvested from cadaveric feet and computed tomography (CT) scans of each bone were obtained. The CT data were used to create digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) of each bone. Bones were attached to a single axis translational stage and imaged at 1000Hz at 13 discrete positions; data were averaged to an effective 100Hz sampling rate. DRRs of each bone were matched to X-ray data from each fluoroscope, and the three-dimensional position of each bone was calculated. Initial positions were manually found prior to the optimization algorithm calculating the “best” pose for every frame of each position (Figure 1). Accuracy is the root mean square (RMS) value of the difference between the software determined position and the known linear stage position. Precision is the standard deviation of the differences between these known and measured positions.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Fluoroscopy data with matched DRR overlay. Note: dense fluoroscope objects, such as the translational stage adaptor (to the left of the bone) show brighter than the background, while the DRR bone is displayed by pixel intensities darker than the background. Beads were not used.

Results

The translational accuracy for the entire data set (6 bones * 13 positions per bone * 10 frames per position = 780 frames) was 0.066mm with a precision of ± 0.062mm (Table 1).
Table 1

Individual bone accuracy and precision values, along with grand values for the six bone set.

 

Calcaneus 1

Calcaneus 2

Talus 1

Talus 2

Metatarsal 1

Metatarsal 2

Grand

Accuracy

0.075

0.026

0.025

0.033

0.023

0.012

0.066

Precision

0.087

0.025

0.029

0.028

0.030

0.018

0.062

Preliminary conclusions

These translational accuracy and precision values match well with other similar dual fluoroscopy systems studying areas of the body such as the spine [2] and knee [3]. Further, these values are an order of magnitude improvement over optical motion capture systems and have the ability to measure kinematics which are traditionally difficult to capture in the foot, such as talar motion. The full model-based validation of this system (which includes rotational and dynamic trials) is currently underway.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The work was funded by VA RR&D Grant F7468R.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
RR&D Center of Excellence, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
(2)
Depts. of Mechanical Eng, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
(3)
Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
(4)
Orthopaedics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

References

  1. Iaquinto JM, Tsai R, Haynor DR, Fassbind MJ, Sangeorzan BJ, Ledoux WR: Marker-based validation of a biplane fluoroscopy system for quantifying foot kinematics. Med Eng Phys. 2013, 24: in pressGoogle Scholar
  2. Massimini DF, Warner JJ, Li G: Non-invasive determination of coupled motion of the scapula and humerus-- an in-vitro validation. J Biomech. 2011, 44 (3): 408-12. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bey MJ, Kline SK, Tashman S, Zauel R: Accuracy of biplane x-ray imaging combined with model-based tracking for measuring in-vivo patellofemoral joint motion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008, 3 (38):Google Scholar

Copyright

© Iaquinto et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement