This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Dermatology within the UK podiatric literature: a content analysis (1989-2010)
© Bristow and Borthwick; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 21 March 2013
Accepted: 15 May 2013
Published: 24 May 2013
Although dermatology, as a medical subject, has been a facet of the training and education of podiatrists for many years, it is, arguably, only in recent years that the speciality of podiatric dermatology has emerged within the profession. Some indication of this gradual development may be identified through a content analysis of the podiatric literature in the UK, spanning a 21 year timeframe.
6 key professional journals were selected for content analysis in order to provide a picture of the emergence and development of podiatric dermatology over a period extending from 1989 to 2010. Both syntactical and thematic unitization were deployed in the analysis, revealing both manifest and latent content. Categories were devised using a prior coding, a codebook produced to define relevant concepts and category characteristics, and the coding scheme subject to an assessment of reliability.
1611 units appeared in the 6 journals across a 21 year timeframe. 88% (n = 1417) occurred in one journal (Podiatry Now and its predecessors). Modal categories within all journals included course adverts (n = 673), commercial adverts (n = 562) and articles by podiatrists (n = 133). There was an overall rise from 40 per annum in 1989, to over 100 in 2010. A wider range of dermatological topics were addressed, ranging from fungal nail infections to melanoma.
It is evident from this analysis that there has been an increasing focus on dermatology as a topic within the main podiatric journals in the UK over the last 21 years, primarily reflecting a rise in commercial advertising and an increase in academic dermatology related publications. Whilst earlier publications tended to focus on warts and fungal infections, more recent publications address a broader spectrum of topics. Changes in prescribing rights may be relevant to these findings, as may the enhanced professional and regulatory body requirements on continuing professional development.
Throughout the history of chiropody/podiatry in the United Kingdom, links to dermatology are evident within the professional literature. As a subject, it is evident as part of the UK chiropody curriculum since the inception of the first school in 1919 – initially as a subject delivered by visiting dermatologists and physicians and latterly, following the formation of the Society of Chiropodists, when formalization of the syllabus occurred in the 1950’s [1–3].
At a postgraduate level, for a period of 30 years (from 1945) the journal entitled “The Chiropodist” a professional podiatric journal of the Society of Chiropodists & Podiatrists had published over 50 papers on the subject of dermatology . Virtually all of these papers were written by eminent dermatologists of the time such as MacKenna , Bettley , Ryan , Grant-Peterkin , Champion  and Williams . Moreover, all of the papers were reprints from medical journals. As an editorial explained at the time, this was a sad reflection of the lack of research publications from within the chiropody profession  during this period. Records from this period demonstrate that dermatologists were also frequently invited to speak at Annual Conventions of the Society [12–16].
In 1975, the Society of Chiropodists had recognised the number of specialist interest groups emerging with a common interest in progressing technical skills (particularly podiatric surgery). As a consequence, a Postgraduate Board was assembled that year, consisting of representation from the Faculty of Anaesthesia, Podiatry Association and the Royal College of Physicians, to review and approve courses and as a means of ensuring quality standards, patient safety and insurance cover [17, 18]. At the end of the decade and into the early 1980’s, chiropodists were increasingly being recognised as developing specialities in the care of the diabetic foot , ischaemic limbs  and “biomechanics”  facilitated by the increase in postgraduate courses available . Towards the end of the 1980’s, development of these specialities were well established, in part, possibly driven by the new degree status awarded to the profession around this period . A survey conducted in 1987 examined the expectations of chiropody students, and high numbers had aspirations upon graduation to work within these specialities .
Today, dermatology is taught at an undergraduate level both formally in the classroom and in the clinical setting. As with the medical model, demands for encompassing a wide range of areas in the professional curriculum have tended to side line the subject  despite the fact that skin problems on the foot are a common entity [26, 27] and much of a clinicians work is focussed on treating skin related pathologies. Expanding roles within podiatry, as evidenced by the recent acquisition of rights to independent prescribing of medicines in both the UK and Australia, alongside a growth in other effective management therapies for disorders of the skin new to podiatry, further emphasise the need for good diagnostic and therapeutic skills. This paper aims to profile the development of dermatological knowledge within the UK podiatry profession, subsequent to the introduction of degree programmes in podiatry for a period of 21 years (1989-2010).
Provide peer-reviewed scientific and clinical evidence.
Hold an educational role.
Maintain practitioners’ awareness of contemporary issues within the profession.
Inform practitioners about non-clinical issues including politics, ethics and history.
Forecast future trends.
Provide basic background in science and research.
Act as a bridge between the textbook and the clinic.
What is the extent and coverage of dermatology within the selected journals (1989-2010)?
How has dermatological coverage changed during the study period?
Podiatry Now (and its former titles - The Chiropodist and The Journal of British Podiatric Medicine): 1989 – 2010
The Foot (commenced in 1991): 1991 – 2010
Search News (ceased publication in 1997): 1990 – 1997
British Journal of Podiatry (Commenced 1998 and ceased publication in 2007): 1998 – 2007
Journal of British Podiatric Medicine & Surgery (ceased publication in 1997): 1989 – 1997
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research (E-journal commenced 2008): 2008-2010
The journals given above were subject to a well-established and widely applied method of documentary analysis known as content analysis . Both a syntactical and thematic form of unitization was undertaken, centred on identifying keywords which could easily be replicated. Syntactical unitization is the identification of specific keywords which require little interpretation or judgement as to their meaning – for example words such as “dermatology” or “skin”. Such terms are relatively simple and are less open to interpretation and therefore more reliable . Thematic unitization allowed for analysis of text identifying the present of a concept or theme which may not be overtly evident , as being part of the terms of study such as “bullous Impetigo” or “sun awareness and the risk of skin cancer” for example. By combining both forms of unitization it permitted the content to be explored with greater depth for validity and understanding within a reference frame of dermatology and ensured that both manifest and latent content were assessed .
Categories were devised in a manner as described by Weber  using a technique of a priori coding  where categories were determined prior to the analysis. In order to gain context to the data, categories were constructed by the author to be meaningful, reflecting the different aspects of the journal function, for example:
Editorial: Reflecting the political views of the professional body.
Correspondence: Expressing the issues of the readership.
Advertisements: Illustrating current trends in industry.
Articles by Podiatrists: Current areas of publications and research.
Conference Abstracts: Representing special interest groups.
News: Current issues of political, professional or personal interest.
To reduce ambiguities, a codebook was produced clearly defining the concept under analysis and individual category characteristics. The coding scheme was then tested by analysing a sample of text. This was undertaken to verify that the categories held a clear definition ensuring exclusivity and that all data was exhaustive.
Following the testing stage, each journal in the specified range was read and any reference or commentary related to dermatology was noted and placed into one of the categories. The timeframe across which this study ran was determined as twenty-one years, reflecting the time the author has been registered.
Inclusion criteria for the analysis included any themes relating to skin disorders affecting the feet. Themes were excluded if they related to routine palliative procedures for nails, corns and callus as implied in the definition given by Farndon et al.  as this represents a function of “core” podiatry/chiropody skills. To prevent overlap into areas of wound care and diabetes care any themes related to common diabetic skin manifestations (vascular and neurological processes) were excluded from the analysis. Coding of the data were undertaken exclusively by the authors.
To ensure basic stability of the coding scheme, an assessment of reliability was undertaken employing the use of a second (independent) coder trained in content analysis – a process termed reproducibility . An entire journal was purposively selected and coded by the second coder to test reproducibility. This journal represented around 8.5% sample of the total items coded.
The data from the two coders was then calculated using Krippendorff’s alpha (α) statistic. Although many different tests are available, this test is widely used and considered robust, taking into account chance agreement and, in addition, the magnitude of disagreements, adjusting also for the type of variable type (nominal, ordinal etc.,)[35–37] which is not addressed by other reliability measures .
The Krippendorff’s alpha statistic ranges from .00 (no agreement) to 1.00 (perfect agreement) demonstrating a high level agreement from the data. Krippendorff’s alpha (α) statistic was calculated using the SPSS Statistics Package version 17 (SPSS Inc, USA) and the customized SPSS macro for Krippendorff’s alpha . Reproducibility for this data were reported as 0.9727 - very high, indicating a high level of agreement between coders.
The journal “Search” ran for 7 years from 1990 until being integrated into Podiatry Now  and was circulated primarily to managers within the NHS consequently little dermatological content was evident. In the latter half of its publication years, a number of short news items were published including reporting trials from medical research on warts , psoriasis , melanoma  and new products . Only three dermatological papers appeared in the journal written by podiatrists; on the topics of fungal nail treatments , urea based emollients  and dry skin  and were generally small NHS departmental studies. Latterly, mentions of the dermatology were made when discussing the development of continuing professional development programmes in 1996 .
The British journal of podiatric medicine and surgery
The British Journal of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery (BJPMS) was the official journal of the Podiatry Association (PA), published up until 1997 when it became part of the British Journal of Podiatry . The PA was predominantly a group representing the interests of podiatric surgeons within the UK. Despite its surgical leanings, a small number of references to dermatological papers published in medical journals are made on topics such as onychomycosis and melanoma . The topic of antifungals and steroid creams also occurs when discussions are made on prescription rights in 1996 . As expected papers on nail surgery are evident, albeit in small numbers (n = 3) in the 7 year period.
The foot journal
The Foot (fully titled “The Foot – the International Journal of Clinical Foot Science”) differed from all the other podiatry journal analysed in this study as it is the only one which the editorial board is shared with another professional group; orthopaedic surgeons. The journal was launched in 1991 and was originally distributed with Society of Chiropodists members’ subscription free of charge until around 2001. It was hoped to showcase graduate research and become an academic journal with Index Medicus status [39, 50] and establish an impact factor - something at the time which had eluded all UK podiatric journals . Analysis of its content revealed a total of 32 dermatological related papers. Of these 14 were published by medics and focussed primarily on skin tumours and common foot infections [52–65] whilst podiatry lead author papers focused on mycoses [66–71], wart infections [72–74], electrosurgery [75, 76] and epidemiology . Interestingly, other single papers by Podiatrists focused on less commonly encountered dermatological conditions [78–82]. Three papers were investigations into the pathology of corns and callus [83–85]. Nail surgery was a topic of eight papers [86–93]. Minimal course advertisements and commercial advertising were evident in this academic publication.
British journal of podiatry
The British Journal of Podiatry began in 1998, comprising of the two former journals – The Journal of British Podiatric Medicine and the British Journal of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery intending to carry editorials, refereed articles and professional information. In its 10 year history, 20 dermatological papers were identified written by Podiatrists with an additional 4 on nail surgery [94–97]. Areas of dermatological focus included warts [98–101], fungal infections [102, 103], case studies on tumours and unusual infections [104–110]. Four studies looked at more academic areas and laboratory work relating to dermatology [111–114]. Two papers looked at treatments for skin conditions [115, 116].
Journal of foot and ankle research
Less than 0.1% of all units occurred in this journal, explained by its three year lifespan during the study period. Only five publications were evident in the online journal. Four these were on the subject of melanoma, submitted by the author [117–120] whilst one paper studied the epidemiology of callus patterns in the elderly .
Throughout the twenty-one years, 77 dermatology related articles, authored by podiatrists, have been published in the journal. The publication rate has remained at a constant level averaging around 3-4 a year. The focus of the articles has varied slightly over this period. In the earlier years the attention has been on traditional skin problems such as warts [122–125], fungal infections [126–128] as well as general articles on common dermatoses such as psoriasis [129, 130]. At the end of the 1990’s although papers on the traditional topics were still being covered [131–133], skin tumours became an interest with case studies emerging on melanoma , squamous cell carcinoma [135, 136] and Bowen’s disease . At this time, inclusion of a section entitled “Clinical Picture Quiz” which invited authors to send in a clinical quiz for readers attracted a number of dermatological cases over the subsequent years [138–140] including eight from the author [141–148].
Physicians and other healthcare professionals published 14 and 7 dermatology related articles respectively in the journal. The majority of physician authored articles were reprints from other medical journals (n = 9) [149–157]. The reasons for this are unclear. It may reflect a lack of suitable podiatric literature during this period on the subject or an editorial decision to include broader knowledge which may be relevant to podiatrists.
Throughout the study time frame, editorial commentary and correspondence on dermatological themes were rare, particularly in the latter half of this period. In the early part of the period studied, discussion of various dermatological topics in editorial comment was mainly through the writing of Colin Dagnall. Dermatological topics were briefly discussed in his column in the journal (simply entitled “Dagnall”) which ran until the December 1992 issue but also latterly by Dagnall through the correspondence pages. A few years on, references were made in the editorial about dermatological conditions such as fungal foot infections, warts and their treatments and were mentioned in the journal as part of the medianote section as well as occasional new product announcements. A small increase of the study period was also noted for news items and book reviews with an average of one unit per year in 1989, rising modestly to around 3 per year by 2010.
The increase in the number of course advertisements could be explained by a number of possible factors. First, as the Society has grown in its membership, the number of local branches has increased along with the amount of activity. To accommodate this, the journal may have increased the advertisement of locally run courses. More likely however, was the political climate and the Governments move to improve health care in the late 1990’s. The paper entitled ‘A First Class Service’  and subsequent communications  outlined the need for continuing professional development (CPD) within health care professions to maintain and improve quality as part of the clinical governance initiative . The response from the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists was the launch of a programme of CPD modules in 2001 for its members  including a dermatology module, written by the author , which became a part of the core modules offered in 2003 . Latterly, the introduction of mandatory CPD was placed on chiropodists and podiatrists with the introduction of the Health Professions Council (HPC) biennial audit cycles which began in 2006 . Prior to the changes in the CPD process in 2003, only eight individual study days on dermatology had been advertised as update courses to members in the preceding 14 years but following the introduction of the topic as a core subject the numbers of advertisements for such courses increased dramatically to 15 courses in the following 7 years. This trend was mirrored by an increase in the number of course reports which were published in the journal.
The outlier observed in Figure 4 (77 course advertisements in 2006) represented a year in which a large number of dermatological courses were being run whilst simultaneously being heavily advertised. The reason for this is not clear. However, increased advertising in this year may be a reflection of the introduction of mandatory CPD by the Health Professions Council, influencing many local SCP branches to increase their educational provision for their members during this particular year. Similar but smaller increases were noted for the years 1999 (34) and 2000 (48). Both of these represent a disproportionate amount of advertising by an independent company for a course in electrosurgery. Other courses offering dermatological skills (cryosurgery) were identified. Both electrosurgery and cryosurgery courses were more frequently advertised in the first half of the study period suggesting that the need (or demand) for training in these modalities had decreased.
In 2004, inserts appeared within the journal Podiatry Now. These were published as update articles on various topics to enhance the availability of CPD to members . Up until the end of 2010, nine articles had been published with a dermatological theme including fungal infections [166, 167], warts , psoriasis and eczema , emollients , cryosurgery , electrosurgery , melanoma  and non-mechanical causes of hyperkeratosis .
Many lectures by doctors were delivered at a local branch level by consultant dermatologists across the UK. The most frequent topics delivered were general dermatology of the foot and skin tumours/melanoma, when stated in the advertisement. The first conference dedicated wholly to podiatric dermatology was advertised in 2003  and took place at the University College, Northampton. The conference ran for four years on annual basis and accounted for the conference advertising evident in the data from 2003 to 2006.
“Lectures by others” was a category used to denote advertised lectures on dermatological subjects not given by a podiatrist or physician (or occasionally, when the designation of the speaker was not stated). The majority of these were presentations on aspects of microbiology (particularly fungal infections) delivered by mycologists. In addition, some related to prescription only medicines listed as given by a “company representative” (for products such as Loceryl®, Dovonex® and Sporanox®) occurring across the whole of the study period.
Despite the raised profile of the dermatology within podiatry, it has rarely been advertised as a higher education module until recently – a total of five advertisements, with four being in the period 2007-2010 with modules offered by Universities across the UK (Universities of Stirling, Salford, and Sunderland with Glasgow Caledonian University and Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh).
Commercial advertising in podiatry Now
Initial advertisements focused on cryosurgical equipment but this is quickly overtaken in two years by the promotion of emollient products focused on the foot. These continue to be the major part of dermatological advertising in the latter part of the study period. Other frequent products include topical salicylic acid (Occlusal®) preparations, topical antifungal and antiseptic agents (Mykored®, Crystacide® and Monphytol®). The majority of the advertising occurred within Podiatry Now which could be explained as its role as a professional journal reaching all members of the professional body, advertisers would be well aware of its circulation over the other journals mentioned. Particularly heavy periods of advertising are noted in the period 2002 – 2004 which is a reflection of a few emollient and antifungal products being profoundly advertised within this period. The reasons for this are unclear.
Prescription only medicines
In 1994, the first prescription-only medicine (POM) was advertised to UK podiatrists within Podiatry Now. The drug Terbinafine (Lamisil®) is an oral antifungal agent used in the treatment of tinea pedis and onychomycosis. Although UK podiatrists are not able to prescribe independently (just yet), access or supply this medication, the advertisement was carried. The motives of the pharmaceutical company are not clear but presumably this was based on the assumption that podiatrists encounter a lot of fungal foot disease and may consider referring on cases to general practitioners. Subsequently, this would actively promote the fact that a medication was available and ultimately raise awareness and prescriptions of the drug through the general practitioner. Following on in 1996, Itraconazole (Sporanox®) and Amorolfine nail lacquer (Loceryl®) other prescription only medicines were included in the same journal and ran several marketing campaigns. To accompany this, a number of evenings were advertised in the journal, hosted and presented by pharmaceutical representatives promoting antifungal agents and treatments for psoriasis (Dovonex®) to podiatrists. Despite the move in recent years towards increased access to medicines and prescribing, with the introduction of patient group directions and supplementary prescribing for podiatrists, no other advertisements for prescription only medicines have appeared in the journal.
Limitations of the study
Content analysis is defined as a research technique for making replicable and valid inferences from texts (or other meaningful matter) to the contexts of their use . Neuendorf  defines it as the systematic, objective, quantitative analysis of message characteristics. As a technique it can be useful to discover and describe the focus of social attention . The technique allows the researcher to sift through large quantities of data systematically allowing the discovery of inferences and the examination of patterns and trends in documents . This content analysis aimed to give an overview of dermatology and its development within podiatry for the period 1989-2010. In undertaking this, measures were taken to ensure that the data were representative and reliability tests were been undertaken to assess the coding procedure. A full analysis of the mainstream podiatry journals was conducted, rather than a sample, for this period in an attempt to capture the most complete picture
It must be acknowledged that this data can only represent what has been published within these journals and may not fully present the true picture. For example, many courses which have been run during this period may not have been advertised using this medium and so will not have been included. In addition, frequency counting as the sole form of analysis can be misinterpreted, therefore attempts have been made to further analyse the data in order to describe and explain any findings. Content analysis is inherently reductive when placing the data into categories. When defining boundaries and definitions for the key terms it is accepted that there will be material which could be considered borderline. The definition which has been adopted as it emphasizes core podiatry skills – the routine palliative procedures for nails, corns and callus acting as a delineation from dermatology. To prevent overlap into areas of wound care and diabetes any themes related to common diabetic skin manifestations (vascular and neurological processes) were excluded from the analysis. Subsequently, papers have been excluded although it could be argued contribute in a broader sense to dermatology and podiatry including the work of Springett , Potter [179, 180] and Hashmi [113, 181] along with much of the literature pertaining to the diabetic foot.
This content analysis set out to profile the coverage of dermatology within the mainstream podiatric literature from 1989-2010. From this analysis it is evident that there has been an increasing focus on dermatology as a topic within the main podiatric journals published in the UK. This has been predominantly as a rise in advertising of commercial products and increase in dermatology related publications. Nearly 90% of all references to dermatology appeared in one podiatry journal – Podiatry Now and its predecessors. Analysis of the papers published in the journals has shown work was predominantly authored by podiatrists and physicians, with a proportion of the latter featuring as reprints from other journals. Earlier publications from podiatrists tended to focus on traditional skin disorders of warts and fungal infections but more recently case studies and papers have emerged on other skin conditions. Educational and CPD opportunities in dermatology have increased in line with the changes to HPC re-registration and professional body CPD requirements.
- Ford HP: The development of chiropody. The Chiropodist. 1951, 6: 325-334.Google Scholar
- Read PJ: Education in chiropody. The Chiropodist. 1964, 19: 49-53.Google Scholar
- Rosenstein H: The future of chiropody in the national health service. The Chiropodist. 1959, 14: 49-58.Google Scholar
- Bristow IR: The origins and evolution of podiatric dermatology, PhD thesis. 2011, Southampton, United Kingdom: University of Southampton, Faculty of Health SciencesGoogle Scholar
- MacKenna RMB: Diseases of the skin in the elderly. The Chiropodist. 1966, 22: 266-276.Google Scholar
- Bettley FR: Effects of soap on the skin. The Chiropodist. 1959, 14: 304-311.Google Scholar
- Ryan TJ: Vasculitis. The Chiropodist. 1978, 33: 11-16.Google Scholar
- Grant-Peterkin GA: Common skin infections of the feet. The Chiropodist. 1947, 2: 98-100.Google Scholar
- Champion RH: Diseases of the skin - treatment of psoriasis. The Chiropodist. 1968, 23: 113-119.Google Scholar
- Williams DI: Treatment of fungal infections by griseofulvin. The Chiropodist. 1961, 16: 149-154.Google Scholar
- Anon: Be sure of your facts…(editorial). The Chiropodist. 1959, 14: 41-42.Google Scholar
- Anon: Liverpool convention 1969. The Chiropodist. 1969, 24: 22-25.Google Scholar
- Anon: Silver jubilee convention. The Chiropodist. 1970, 25: 98-102.Google Scholar
- Anon: The 1966 cambridge convention in retrospect. The Chiropodist. 1966, 21: 185-186.Google Scholar
- Anon: The norwich convention. The Chiropodist. 1960, 15: 351-354.Google Scholar
- Anon: Forthcoming events and conventions. The Chiropodist. 1956, 11: 97-98.Google Scholar
- Anon: Postgradute education (editorial). The Chiropodist. 1976, 31: 81-82.Google Scholar
- Anon: Postgraduate education. The Chiropodist. 1975, 30: 245-246.Google Scholar
- Hockaday TDR: Improving and extending chiropody services. The Chiropodist. 1979, 34: 337-338.Google Scholar
- Anon: Diabetes. The Chiropodist. 1980, 35: 421-422.Google Scholar
- Anon: Biomechanics. The Chiropodist. 1983, 38: 331-332.Google Scholar
- Anon: The future (editorial). The Chiropodist. 1984, 39: 2-3.Google Scholar
- Spencer C: Degree courses for chiropodists. The Chiropodist. 1988, 43: 131-133.Google Scholar
- Marsh A: An investigation into the attitudes and expectations of final year chiropody students with particular reference to the national health chiropody service. The Chiropodist. 1989, 44: 108-113.Google Scholar
- Bristow IR, Springett K: Podiatry, dermatology & the UKPDA. British Assoc Dermatol Newsletter. 2006, 9: 22-23.Google Scholar
- Burzykowski G, Molenberghs D, Abeck E, Haneke E, Hay RJ, Katsambas D, Roseeuw D, van der Kerkof P, van Aelst R, Marynissen G: High prevalence of foot diseases in Europe: results of the achilles project. Mycoses. 2003, 46: 496-505. 10.1046/j.0933-7407.2003.00933.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomson J: A dermatology service in a school of chiropody. The Chiropodist. 1978, 33: 100-101.Google Scholar
- Lundberg GD: The role and function of professional journals in the transfer of information. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1988, 4: 51-58. 10.1017/S0266462300003251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krippendorf K: Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. 1980, London: SageGoogle Scholar
- Sproule W: Content analysis. Social research methods: an australian perspective. Edited by: Walter M. 2006, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 113-134.Google Scholar
- Kondracki NL, Wellman NS, Amundson DR: Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002, 34: 224-230. 10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60097-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weber RP: Basic content analysis. 1990, London: SageGoogle Scholar
- Stemler S: An overview of content analysis. Pract assess res eval. 2001, 17: 7-Google Scholar
- Farndon L, Vernon W, Potter J, Parry A: The professional role of the podiatrist in the new millennium:an analysis of current practice. Paper 1. Br J Pod. 2002, 5: 68-72.Google Scholar
- Krippendorff K: Content analysis:an introduction to its methodology. 2004, London: Sage, 2Google Scholar
- Krippendorff K: Estimating the reliability, systematic error, and random error of interval data. Educ Psychol Meas. 1970, 30: 61-70. 10.1177/001316447003000105.Google Scholar
- Hayes A, Krippendorff K: Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Methods Meas. 2007, 1: 77-89. 10.1080/19312450709336664.Google Scholar
- Lombard M, Snyder-Duch J, Bracken C: Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting on intercoder reliability. Human Commun Res. 2002, 28: 587-604. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x.Google Scholar
- Anon: The camden accord - the publications (editorial). J British Podiatric Med. 1997, 52: 169-170.Google Scholar
- Anon: Wart treatment by doctors. Search. 1995, 68: 9-Google Scholar
- Anon: Diabetes versus psoriasis. Search. 1995, 62: 6-Google Scholar
- Anon: What’s new on the melanoma front?. Search. 1995, 60: 9-Google Scholar
- Anon: Psoriasis - new treatment products. Search. 1993, 57: 6-Google Scholar
- George MA: A comparison of three treatments for fungal nail infection. Search. 1991, 16: 7-8.Google Scholar
- Kerr T: Clinical trial of dermal therapy. Search. 1994, 47: 4-6.Google Scholar
- Fisher A, Hay S: The motivation of the elderly with a problem of dry feet. Search. 1995, 62: 3-Google Scholar
- Joyce P: Post graduate podiatry education the oxford personnel training plan (PTP). Search. 1996, 73: 7-Google Scholar
- Anon: Podium. British J Podiatric Med Surg. 1995, 7: 72-Google Scholar
- Galloway TR: Extension of access provision for a limited list of prescription only medicines (editorial). British J Podiatric Med Surg. 1996, 8: 19-20.Google Scholar
- Anon: International journals (editorial). Br J Pod. 1999, 2: 102-Google Scholar
- Borthwick AM: ‘Publish and be damned’:disseminating contemporary podiatric research. Br J Pod. 2004, 7: 91-92.Google Scholar
- de Berker D, Dawber RPR: Diagnostic twists in neoplasms of the nail apparatus. Foot. 1992, 2: 73-77. 10.1016/0958-2592(92)90021-G.Google Scholar
- Smith AG: Inflammatory dermatoses of the feet. Foot. 1992, 2: 195-198. 10.1016/0958-2592(92)90048-T.Google Scholar
- Perks AGB, Miller G, Watson JS: Acral lentignous malignant melanoma in a diabetic foot:a plea for better education. Foot. 1993, 3: 83-85. 10.1016/0958-2592(93)90067-D.Google Scholar
- Smith AG: Skin tumours of the foot. Foot. 1994, 4: 175-179. 10.1016/0958-2592(94)90048-5.Google Scholar
- Heim M: Primary squamous carcinoma of the foot: a missed diagnosis. Foot. 1996, 6: 74-76. 10.1016/S0958-2592(96)90040-1.Google Scholar
- Walzack JP, Klugman DJ: Squamous cell carcinoma of the hallux. Foot. 1997, 7: 33-10.1016/S0958-2592(97)90009-2.Google Scholar
- Montgomery F, Fioriti A: Piezogenic papules:treated by resection and hernial closure. Foot. 1998, 8: 171-172. 10.1016/S0958-2592(98)90055-4.Google Scholar
- Heim M, Wershavski M, Siev-Ner I, Azaria M: A late complication of erysipelas. Foot. 1999, 9: 203-205. 10.1054/foot.1999.0565.Google Scholar
- Smith AG: Skin infections of the foot. Foot. 1999, 9: 56-59. 10.1054/foot.1999.0515.Google Scholar
- Thoolen M, Ryan T, Bristow I: A study of the skin of the sole of the foot using high-frequency ultrasonography and histology. Foot. 2000, 10: 14-17. 10.1054/foot.1999.0568.Google Scholar
- Ramlogan D, Batta K, Byrne J: Pemphigus vulgaris presenting as chronic osteomyelitis of the foot. Foot. 2001, 11: 74-75. 10.1054/foot.2001.0668.Google Scholar
- Tytiun Y, Iordache S, Grintal A, Velkes S, Salai M: Bacterial skin contamination and bacterial recolonization, after surgical preparation, in foot operations and prevalence of postoperative early wound infection: a prospective study. Foot. 2005, 15: 74-76. 10.1016/j.foot.2005.02.003.Google Scholar
- Barkham MC, Smith AG, Harris S: Eccrine syringofibroadenoma. Foot. 2006, 16: 198-200. 10.1016/j.foot.2006.07.003.Google Scholar
- O’Neill AC, Purcell EM, Regan PJ: Interdigital pilonidal sinus of the foot. Foot. 2009, 19: 227-228. 10.1016/j.foot.2009.04.002.Google Scholar
- Mann GC, Berry BL: Inopportune choice of treatment for verruca pedis. Foot. 1996, 6: 80-81. 10.1016/S0958-2592(96)90042-5.Google Scholar
- Nicolopoulos CS, Tsioutis V, Nicolopoulos NS, Giannoudis PV: Clinical application of helium neon (632 nm) plus infrared diode laser GaAIAs (830 nm) and CO2 laser in treatment of onychomycotic nails. Foot. 1999, 9: 181-184. 10.1054/foot.1999.0527.Google Scholar
- Ricketti JC: Terbinafine/miconazole nitrate 2% tincture compound for the treatment of onychomycosis. Foot. 2001, 11: 21-23. 10.1054/foot.2000.0653.Google Scholar
- Davies KJ: Study to determine the efficacy of Clotrimazole 1% cream for the treatment of onychomycosis in association with the mechanical reduction of the nail plate. Foot. 2006, 16: 19-22. 10.1016/j.foot.2005.10.004.Google Scholar
- Zalacain A, Ruiz L, Ramis G, Novel V, Ogalla JM, Calvo MA, Vinuesa T: Podiatry care and amorolfine: an effective treatment of foot distal onychomycosis. Foot. 2006, 16: 149-152. 10.1016/j.foot.2006.03.007.Google Scholar
- Zatcoff R, Smith MS, Borkow G: Treatment of tinea pedis with socks containing copper impregnated fibers. Foot. 2007, 18: 136-141.Google Scholar
- Bristow I, Walker N: Pulsed Dye laser for the treatment of plantar warts - two case studies. Foot. 1997, 7: 229-230. 10.1016/S0958-2592(97)90042-0.Google Scholar
- Powell J: Papillomavirus research and plantar warts. Foot. 1998, 8: 26-32. 10.1016/S0958-2592(98)90016-5.Google Scholar
- Ellis MJH, Thomson CE: Consumer health information on the WWW: an evaluation of information on verrucae. Foot. 2003, 13: 130-135. 10.1016/S0958-2592(03)00010-5.Google Scholar
- Bevans JS, Bosson G: A comparison of electrosurgery and sharp debridement in the treatment of chronic neurovascular, neurofibrous and hard corns. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Foot. 2010, 20: 12-17. 10.1016/j.foot.2010.03.003.Google Scholar
- Anderson JM, Burrow JG: A small-scale study to determine the clinical effectiveness of electrosurgery in the treatment of chronic helomata (corns). Foot. 2001, 11: 189-198. 10.1054/foot.2001.0686.Google Scholar
- Mølgaard C, Lundbye-Christensen S, Simonsen O: High prevalence of foot problems in the danish population: a survey of causes and associations. Foot. 2010, 20: 7-11. 10.1016/j.foot.2010.03.002.Google Scholar
- Vohra S, Bates AW, Baithun SI: A rare adnexal tumour of the hallux:malignant chondroid syringoma. Foot. 1996, 6: 175-177. 10.1016/S0958-2592(96)90017-6.Google Scholar
- Padhiar N: Necrobiosis lipodica diabeticorum. Foot. 1997, 7: 47-51. 10.1016/S0958-2592(97)90013-4.Google Scholar
- Barlow A, Parry E: Role of foot orthoses in the management of epidermolysis bullosa simplex. Foot. 1999, 9: 60-64. 10.1054/foot.1999.0510.Google Scholar
- Anderson PJ, Maloney DJL, Berry RB: Subcutaneous granuloma annulare. Foot. 2000, 10: 40-41. 10.1054/foot.1999.0556.Google Scholar
- Smith RG: Shoe dermatitis: a review of current concepts. Foot. 2008, 18: 40-47. 10.1016/j.foot.2007.12.001.Google Scholar
- Potter J, Potter MJ: The effect of callus removal on peak plantar pressures. Foot. 2000, 10: 23-26. 10.1054/foot.2000.0576.Google Scholar
- Potter J, Potter MJ: Regrowth patterns of plantar callus. Foot. 2000, 10: 144-148. 10.1054/foot.2000.0599.Google Scholar
- Springett KP, Whiting MF, Marriott C: Epidemiology of plantar forefoot corns and callus, and the influence of dominant side. Foot. 2003, 13: 5-9. 10.1016/S0958-2592(02)00112-8.Google Scholar
- Dagnall JC: A description of toenail matrix phenolisation 44 years before Boll’s 1945 paper. Foot. 1991, 1: 51-55. 10.1016/0958-2592(91)90014-3.Google Scholar
- Paul AS, Ohiorenoya B, Meadows TH: Subungual exostosis presenting as an ingrowing toenail. Foot. 1991, 1: 125-126. 10.1016/0958-2592(91)90021-3.Google Scholar
- Goslin RW: A comparison of dilution and non-dilution of phenol with alcohol following nail avulsions. Foot. 1992, 2: 225-228. 10.1016/0958-2592(92)90052-Q.Google Scholar
- Middleton A, Webb F: Toenail surgery for diabetic patients. Foot. 1993, 3: 109-113. 10.1016/0958-2592(93)90076-F.Google Scholar
- Heim M, Cohen I, Blankstein A, Hakerem D, Missre A, Dudkiewicz I: To ablate or not to ablate, that is the question. Foot. 2001, 11: 97-98. 10.1054/foot.2001.0673.Google Scholar
- Rounding C, Hulm S: Surgical treatments for ingrowing toenails. Foot. 2001, 11: 166-182. 10.1054/foot.2001.0692.Google Scholar
- Kaleel SS, Iqbal S, Arbuthnot J, Lamont G: Surgical options in the management of ingrown toenails in paediatric age group. Foot. 2007, 17: 214-217. 10.1016/j.foot.2007.06.007.Google Scholar
- Córdoba-Fernández A, Ruiz-Garrido G, Canca-Cabrera Á: Algorithm for the management of antibiotic prophylaxis in onychocryptosis surgery. Foot. 2010, 20: 140-145. 10.1016/j.foot.2010.09.007.Google Scholar
- Davies KJ: Case report: pseudomonas aeruginosa infection following nail avulsion. Br J Pod. 2000, 3: 7-9.Google Scholar
- Blake A: A postoperative comparison of partial nail avulsion using phenol and cryotherapy. Br J Pod. 2005, 8: 128-132.Google Scholar
- Cumming S, Stewart S, Harborne D, Smith J, Broom H, Abbott A, Barton A: A randomised controlled trial of phenol and sodium hydroxide in nail surgery. Br J Pod. 2005, 8: 123-127.Google Scholar
- Day JC: A retrospective comparative study between HIV positive individuals and HIV negative individuals who have undergone partial nail avulsion surgery for onychocryptosis. Br J Pod. 2006, 9: 60-62.Google Scholar
- Chapman C, Visaya G: Treatment of multiple verrucae by triggering cell-mediated immunity - a clinical trial. Br J Pod. 1998, 1: 89-90.Google Scholar
- Lelliott PE, Robinson C: A retrospective study to evaluate verrucae regrowth following electrosurgery. Br J Pod. 1999, 2: 84-88.Google Scholar
- Forster M: The use of electro-desiccation in the treatment of corns and verrucae. Br J Pod. 2000, 3: 64-66.Google Scholar
- Mortimer A, Percivall A: A review of english senior school policies for the prevention and spread of verrua plantaris. Br J Pod. 2001, 4: 95-100.Google Scholar
- Bristow I: Onychomycosis - a review of its presentation and treatment. Br J Pod. 2004, 7: 64-67.Google Scholar
- Brown LA, MacLarnon N: Do patients with untreated tinea pedis have concomitant fungal contamination within their footwear and hosiery. Br J Pod. 2007, 10: 134-138.Google Scholar
- Swinscoe M: Podiatric parasitology. Br J Pod. 1998, 1: 106-108.Google Scholar
- Weir HK, Carline T: Nail changes associated with the human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-a case report. Br J Pod. 2000, 3: 9-12.Google Scholar
- Wall B: Leishmaniasis - an overview of the disease and two case studies. Br J Pod. 2001, 4: 3-7.Google Scholar
- Bours PW, Gilheany MF: Pyogenic granuloma. An atypical appearance in the foot. Br J Pod. 2007, 10: 57-59.Google Scholar
- Hutchby M, Metcalfe S: Digital adenocarcinoma. Br J Pod. 2007, 10: 45-46.Google Scholar
- Ward R, Boon G: Case report. Lesser toe fibrolipoma in a patient with hereditary angioedema. Br J Pod. 2007, 10: 35-38.Google Scholar
- Waddington AM, Hogg L: The surgical management of a subungual acral malignant melanoma:a case presentation and review of the literature. Br J Pod. 2007, 10: 166-170.Google Scholar
- McCourt FJ: Normal plantar stratum corneum and callus. An analysis of fatty acids. Br J Pod. 1998, 1: 98-101.Google Scholar
- Ingle M: The structure of keratin. Br J Pod. 1999, 2: 13-16.Google Scholar
- Hashmi F: Non-enzymatic glycation and the development of plantar callus. Br J Pod. 2000, 3: 91-94.Google Scholar
- Plummer J, Springett K, Phillips G: Skin protection for use with caustics in podiatric practice: efficiency of a polymer paint. Br J Pod. 2004, 7: 68-70.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson A, Kilmartin T: A study into the long term effectiveness of electro-surgery for the treatment of corns. Br J Pod. 1998, 1: 138-141.Google Scholar
- Rankin S, Swinscoe M: Alternative treatments and folk remedies in the treatment of warts. Br J Pod. 2002, 5: 12-14.Google Scholar
- Bristow I, Acland K: Acral lentiginous melanoma of the foot: a review of 27 cases. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008, 1: 11-10.1186/1757-1146-1-11.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bristow I, de Berker D: Development of a practical guide for the early recognition of malignant melanoma of the foot and nail unit. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010, 3: 22-10.1186/1757-1146-3-22.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bristow IR, Bowling J: Dermoscopy as a technique for the early identification of foot melanoma: a review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009, 2: 14-10.1186/1757-1146-2-14.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bristow IR, de Berker DA, Acland KM, Turner RJ, Bowling J: Clinical guidelines for the recognition of melanoma of the foot and nail unit. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010, 3: 25-10.1186/1757-1146-3-25.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Spink M, Menz H, Lord S: Distribution and correlates of plantar hyperkeratotic lesions in older people. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009, 2: 8-10.1186/1757-1146-2-8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Custance B: Clinical case study. Chiropodist. 1990, 45: 148-150.Google Scholar
- Morris HJ: The treatment of multple and mosiac warts. Chiropodist. 1989, 44: 2,4-Google Scholar
- Russell M: Podiatric cryosurgery. Chiropodist. 1990, 45: 195-197.Google Scholar
- Ashford R, Steele K: Granuflex E hydrocolloid dressing and Salactol in the treatment of verruca pedis:a randomised comparative study. J British Podiatric Med. 1993, 48: 107-113.Google Scholar
- George MA: A comparison of three treatments for fungal nail infection. Chiropodist. 1991, 46: 134-135.Google Scholar
- Foxall JD, Richards N: A review of podiatric management of onychomycosis (tinea unguium). J British Podiatric Med. 1993, 48: 53-56.Google Scholar
- Mooney J: A review of current treatments for toenail mycoses. J British Podiatric Med. 1993, 48: 5-6.Google Scholar
- Kingsford AC: Psoriasis. Chiropodist. 1989, 44: 35-39.Google Scholar
- Beeson P: The clinical significance for chiropodists of recent advances made in the pathology and treatment of Psoriasis. Chiropodist. 1990, 45: 43-46.Google Scholar
- Santos D: Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of the nail:a case report. British J Podiatric Med. 1997, 52: 37-38.Google Scholar
- Stepney E: Fungal nail infection - a new perspective. Podiatry Now. 1998, 1: 221-223.Google Scholar
- Swinscoe MJ: A case of onychomadesis associated with the use of co-trimoxazole in a female patient - a clinical report. J British Podiatric Med. 1997, 52: 30-Google Scholar
- Thomson T: Malignant melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma on the foot. Four case reports. J British Podiatric Med. 1996, 51: 149-150.Google Scholar
- Haverstock B: Squamous cell carcinoma of the foot - a literature review and case report. British J Podiatric Med. 1997, 52: 76-79.Google Scholar
- Sandilands S, Bligh MG: Subungual squamous cell carcinoma in the toe. A case report. J British Podiatric Med. 1996, 51: 5-6.Google Scholar
- Stewart GA: Case study. Podiatry Now. 1998, 1: 415-Google Scholar
- Kaura C, Francis BE: Clinical picture quiz 54. Podiatry Now. 1999, 2: 343-Google Scholar
- Kilmartin T: Clinical picture quiz 43. Podiatry Now. 1998, 1: 295-Google Scholar
- Conway JJ: Clinical picture quiz 36. Podiatry Now. 1998, 1: 7-12.Google Scholar
- Bristow I: Clinical picture quiz. Podiatry Now. 2004, 7: 26-30.Google Scholar
- Bristow I: Clinical picture quiz. Podiatry Now. 2007, 10: 46-Google Scholar
- Bristow IR: Clinical picture quiz. Podiatry Now. 2003, 6: 13-34.Google Scholar
- Bristow I, Banfield CC: Clinical picture quiz 47. Podiatry Now. 1999, 2: 87-Google Scholar
- Bristow IR: Clinical picture quiz 58. Podiatry Now. 2000, 3: 191-211.Google Scholar
- Bristow I: Clinical picture quiz 61. Podiatry Now. 2000, 3: 468-472.Google Scholar
- Bristow IR: Clinical picture quiz 64. Podiatry Now. 2001, 4: 569-Google Scholar
- Bristow I: Case study challenge (dermatology). Podiatry Now. 2002, 5: 117-Google Scholar
- Danci T, Ersanli Z: Skin and connective tissue disorders in diabetes mellitus. J British Podiatric Med. 1996, 51: 151-154.Google Scholar
- Denning DW, Evans EGV, Kibbler CC, Richardson MD, Roberts MM, Rogers TR, Warnock DW, Warren RE: Fungal nail disease:a guide to good practice (report of a working group of the british society for medical mycology). J British Podiatric Med. 1996, 51: 62-66.Google Scholar
- Williams HC, Pottier A, Strachan D: The descriptive epidemiology of warts in British school children. J British Podiatric Med. 1994, 49: 171-176.Google Scholar
- de Berker D: Management of nail unit wounds. British J Podiatric Med. 1993, 48: 175-177.Google Scholar
- Butcher W, Papworth S, Parvin S, Darke S: Eighty-five consecutive cases of cellulitis:clinical features, management and implications for hospital care. Podiatry Now. 2003, 6: 26-29.Google Scholar
- Tan BB, Lear JT, English JSC: Metastasis from carcinoma of the breast masquerading as chilblains. J British Podiatric Med. 1997, 52: 143-Google Scholar
- Mattone-Volpe F: Cutaneous larva migrans infection in the pediatric foot. Podiatry Now. 1998, 1: 289-293.Google Scholar
- Cox NH, Colver G, Paterson WD: Management and morbidity of cellulitis of the leg. Podiatry Now. 1999, 2: 292-295.Google Scholar
- Baron S, Goulden V, Stables G: Atypical melanoma. Podiatry Now. 2004, 7: 22-23.Google Scholar
- Department of Health: A first class service - quality in the new NHS. 1998, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
- Department of Health: Continuing professional development. Quality in the new NHS. 1999, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
- Department of Health: Clinical governance - quality in the New NHS. 1999, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
- Potter MJ: Making progress with CPD and beyond (editorial). Br J Pod. 2002, 5: 3-Google Scholar
- Bristow IR: Core update course in dermatology. 2003, College of Podiatrists, Society of Chiropodists & Podiatrists: Faculty of Podiatric MedicineGoogle Scholar
- Potter M: Faculty of podiatric medicine. Br J Pod. 2003, 6: 3-Google Scholar
- Anon: HPC introduces CPD requirements for podiatrists from July 2006. Podiatry Now. 2006, 9: 6-Google Scholar
- Potter MJ: Continuing professional development and podiatry Now. Podiatry Now. 2004, 7: 22-Google Scholar
- Bristow IR: Onychomycosis:guide to management. Podiatry Now. 2004, 7: S1-S8.Google Scholar
- Bristow I: Tinea pedis:diagnosis and management. Podiatry Now. 2004, 7: S1-S8.Google Scholar
- Potter M, Bristow I: The treatment and management of verrucae using caustics. Podiatry Now. 2006, 9: S1-S8.Google Scholar
- Bristow IR, Ersser S: Inflammatory skin conditions: psoriasis and eczema. Podiatry Now. 2004, 7: S1-S8.Google Scholar
- Penzer R: Emollients:selection and application. Podiatry Now. 2005, 8: S1-S8.Google Scholar
- Colver G: Cryosurgery in podiatric practice. Podiatry Now. 2005, 8: S1-S8.Google Scholar
- Percivall A: Principles of electrosurgery. Podiatry Now. 2006, 9: s1-s8.Google Scholar
- Ardern-Jones M: Malignant melanoma. Podiatry Now. 2008, 11: s1-s8.Google Scholar
- Bristow IR: Hyperkeratosis of the foot: part 1. Podiatry Now. 2008, 11: S1-S8.Google Scholar
- Anon: Continuing professional development - a new initiative (editorial). J British Podiatric Med. 1996, 51: 129-130.Google Scholar
- Bristow I: Podiatric dermatology group to be launched at conference. Podium. 2003, 1: 10-Google Scholar
- Neuendorf KA: The content analysis guidebook. 2002, London: SageGoogle Scholar
- Springett K, Parsons S, Young M, Cheek E: The effect and safety of three corn care products. Br J Pod. 2002, 5: 82-86.Google Scholar
- Potter J: The use of salicylic acid in the treatment of dorsal corn and callus. Br J Pod. 2000, 3: 51-55.Google Scholar
- Potter J: Hyperkeratosis of the foot:part 2. Podiatry Now. 2008, 11: S1-S8.Google Scholar
- Hashmi F, Malone-Lee J, Hounsell E: Plantar skin in type 2 diabetes:an investigation of the biochemical and biomechanical nature of plantar epidermis (poster). Br J Pod. 2004, 8: 25-Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.