Skip to main content


  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Systematic review on the use of foot orthosis in symptomatic pes planus

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20125 (Suppl 1) :P2

  • Published:


  • Clinical Trial
  • Systematic Review
  • Data Base
  • Adult Population
  • Alternative Intervention


Physiologic (flexible) pes planus (flatfoot) is a descriptive term for feet that have a visually lowered medial longitudinal arch often in association with rearfoot eversion [1]. Reported to affect approximately 15% of the adult population [2] physiologic pes planus can be categorised as either symptomatic (painful, non-functional) or non-symptomatic (non-painful, functional) with the literature purporting that flexible non-symptomatic pes planus is a predominantly benign condition with no justification for intervention [3]. When pes planus is symptomatic however, functional foot orthoses are often prescribed and are the most commonly quoted intervention within the literature[4]. Despite some controversy for their use in pes planus, functional foot orthoses remain the cornerstone of podiatric management of this common disorder. The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence for the use of foot orthoses in adults with symptomatic pes planus.

Materials and methods

A systematic review of randomised, quasi-randomised or controlled clinical trials comparing rigid or semi-rigid functional foot orthoses with: no orthoses or any other approach to managing symptomatic flexible pes planus in the adult. Relevant data bases were searched from inception to October 2011 with studies meeting the predetermined inclusion criteria retrieved and screened by two independent reviewers. No restrictions were placed on type of foot orthoses or alternative interventions. Included studies were independently assessed by two reviewers with risk of bias determined by the Cochrane criteria. Where feasible, meta-analysis will be undertaken.


A narrative summary will be presented of the results with outcome measures to include: pain, gait changes (efficiency, temporal or spatial changes), dynamic foot function or static foot posture changes.


A determination of the current level/s of evidence for the use of foot orthoses in the adult with symptomatic pes planus.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia


  1. Otman S, Basgoze O, Gokce-Kutsal Y: Energy cost of walking with flat feet. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1988, 12: 73-76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kosashvili Y, et al: The correlation between pes planus and anterior knee or intermittent low back pain. Foot Ankle Int. 2008, 29: 910-913. 10.3113/FAI.2008.0910.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Staheli LT: Planovalgus foot deformity - Current status. J Am Podiat Med Assn. 1999, 89: 94-99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Esterman A, Pilotto L: Foot shape and its effect on functioning in Royal Australian Air Force recruits. Part 2: pilot, randomized, controlled trial of orthotics in recruits with flat feet. Mil Med. 2005, 170: 629-633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Banwell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.