- Oral presentation
- Open Access
How accurately can surface markers be placed on bony landmarks of the foot?
© Kothari et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Published: 10 April 2012
- Surface Marker
- Female Subject
- Model Accuracy
- Anatomical Landmark
- Single Tester
The use of multi-segment foot models is becoming increasingly popular during clinical gait analysis. While numerous studies have established the repeatability of these models, the accuracy is more difficult to determine since measuring motion of the bones is a challenging task. One assumption influencing model accuracy is that surface markers can be placed precisely over palpated, bony landmarks. The aim of this study is to test this assumption by assessing marker placement using CT scans.
Twenty female subjects (forty feet) participated in this study. All subjects had ECG electrodes attached to their lower limbs according to the positions required by the Oxford Foot Model . Positioning was performed by a single tester on all subjects. Subjects lay supine in the CT scanner, in a semi-weight-bearing position using a custom-built rig. The anatomical landmarks and the positions of the markers were identified on the scans using a pre-defined protocol. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed. Marker placement accuracy was determined by assessing relevant components of the distance between markers and bony landmarks.
Reliability for identifying landmarks
95% confidence interval
0.19 mm - 0.37 mm
0.21 mm - 0.57 mm
Surface markers can be placed accurately over bony landmarks on the foot; however, some positions can be more precisely palpated than others. This should be taken into account when interpreting results from multi-segment foot models.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.