- Oral presentation
- Open Access
Preliminary results of a biomechanics driven design of a total ankle prosthesis
© Leardini et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Published: 26 September 2008
- Tibial Component
- Early Clinical Result
- Total Ankle Replacement
- Wear Simulator
- AOFAS Score
Between July 2003 and May 2007, the prosthesis was implanted in 189 patients at 7 hospitals in Northern Italy. Mean age was 59.4 years. The diagnosis was post-traumatic OA in 79.3%, primary OA in 6.9%, RA in 8.0%. At one hospital, range of motion was measured in the operating theatre before and after implantation in 90 ankles, and meniscal motion in lateral radiograms at maximum plantar- and dorsi-flexion in 30 ankles.
At September 2007, the mean follow-up was 21 months. The mean pre-operative AOFAS score of 41.1 rose to 80.2, 79.7, 77.9, and 79.0 respectively at 18, 24, 36, 48 months. Mean dorsi-flexion increased after implantation from 0.1° to 9.7°, plantar-flexion from 15.1° to 24.6°. From radiographic measurements, the range of full motion, 14° – 53°, was significantly correlated to the range of bearing movement on the tibial component, 2–11 mm (r2 = 0.37, p < 0.0005), as predicted. Two revision operations had been performed, respectively for obvious surgical and indication errors.
There were no device related revisions (loosening, fracture, dislocation). The Kaplan-Meier survival rate (components removal as end-point) at 4 years was 97% (Confidence interval 92–100).
The shapes of the three components are compatible with physiologic ankle mobility and with the natural role of the ligaments. The survival rate at four years compares well with multi-centre 5-year rates published by the Swedish (531 cases, survival 78%), Norwegian (257, 89%) and New Zealand (202, 86%) registries and with a recent meta-analysis . The early clinical results have demonstrated safety and efficacy and encourage a widening of the clinical trial.
- Leardini A, et al: Clin Orth Rel Res. 2004, 424: 39-46. 10.1097/01.blo.0000132246.26172.b7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leardini A, et al: J Biomech. 1999, 32: 111-118. 10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00157-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leardini A, et al: J Biomech. 1999, 32: 585-591. 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00022-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leardini A, et al: Med Biol Eng Comp. 2001, 39: 168-175. 10.1007/BF02344799.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leardini A, et al: Gait Post. 2002, 15: 220-229. 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00153-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reggiani B, et al: J Biomech. 2006, 39: 1435-1443. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Affatato S, et al: J Biomech. 2007, 40 (8): 1871-6. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.08.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stengel D, et al: Arch Orth Trau Surg. 2005, 125: 109-119. 10.1007/s00402-004-0765-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.