Volume 1 Supplement 1

1st Congress of the International Foot & Ankle Biomechanics (i-FAB) community

Open Access

3D foot joints angle description using projected lines on anatomical planes

  • Hossein Rouhani1Email author,
  • Julien Favre1,
  • Xavier Crevoisier2,
  • Brigitte M Jolles2 and
  • Kamiar Aminian1
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20081(Suppl 1):O31

https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-1-S1-O31

Published: 26 September 2008

Introduction

An increasing trend for 3D kinematic analysis of multi-segment foot has emerged both in clinical and biomechanical studies [1, 2]. Nevertheless, existence of several joints among tiny bones of foot causes difficulties both for joint angle definition and their measurement. Unlike with the larger lower limbs bone, it is hardly possible to put three reflective markers over each foot bone. Subsequently, it is not practical to define local coordinate systems (LCS) for all foot segments bounding foot joints. This work proposed a simple method for foot joints angle description which is easy to interpret.

Methods

Since it is hardly possible to have LCS based on three rigid markers per foot segment, many of standard joint angle description methods (e.g. JCS) might not be suitable for many foot joints. Moreover, such conventional methods might not be efficient for some foot joint angles descriptions in clinical applications.

Recently, Simon et al [2] proposed a new foot joint angle description where each joint angle is defined by the rotation angle between two lines corresponding to two segments about a rotation axis on the third segment. The defined joint angle is equal with the angle between projections of two lines on the normal plane of the rotation axis. The results were repeatable and reliable. Nevertheless, there was a need for defining one axis for each considered joint which complicates the 3D kinematic model of foot. We proposed to define all foot joint angles by projection on three common anatomical planes.

Sagittal, coronal and transverse planes of whole foot were defined based on [3]. For each considered foot joint, one line per each of two segments bounding the joint was defined between captured anatomical landmarks (AL). As an example, Figure 1 depicts this method for the case of angle calculation for the considered joint between calcaneus and metatarsals.
Figure 1

Definition of calcaneus-metatarsals joint angles: a) Lines defined for sagittal projection b) Lines defined for coronal projection.

Results

The proposed method was applied for foot kinematic analysis of 6 subjects with 21 tiny markers on ALs of foot. The 3D joint angle patterns and ranges were comparable to those of the other methods [1]. For similar angles, repeatability and sensitivity to measurement errors were showed to be in the same range as other angle representation methods.

Conclusion

A method to describe 3D angles of foot joints was suggested with an easy clinical interpretation. Without use of LCS, the method had also the similar performance as other conventions. Yet, the movement of foot's anatomical planes can induce error which can be avoided by definition of rotation axis on the same joint segments and not others. The suitability of method will be soon assessed in clinical applications.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL-LMAM)
(2)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois & University of Lausanne

References

  1. Leardini A, et al: Gait & Posture. 2007, 25: 453-462. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Simon J, et al: Gait & Posture. 2006, 23: 411-424. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.07.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cappozzo A, et al: Clinical Biomechanics. 1995, 10 (4): 171-178. 10.1016/0268-0033(95)91394-T.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rouhani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement