Volume 1 Supplement 1
Foot joint pressures during dynamic gait simulation
© Edwards et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Published: 26 September 2008
5 fresh cadaveric specimens were connected to a dynamic gait simulator. I-scan #6900 sensors® were calibrated and surgically inserted into the subtalar (ST), naviculocuneiform (NC) calcaneocuboid (CC), and talonavicular (TN) joints using a joint spreader. Each foot was walked multiple trials across a force platform for three conditions (normal, flatfoot, flatfoot-orthotic). The flatfoot condition was created by detaching the posterior tibial tendon from the simulator and surgically releasing the spring ligament complex and the plantar fascia. Joint pressure data were collected at 100 Hz. Peak pressures were averaged within subjects and effect sizes were calculated between conditions.
According to Cohen , effect sizes of .20, .50 and .80 represent small, medium and large differences, respectively.
Measurements of effect size
Normal vs Flatfoot
Normal vs Orthotic
Flatfoot vs Othotic
Adult acquired flatfoot deformity appears to increase pressure at the CC joint, and slightly decrease pressure at the NC joint. The use of orthotics may be an effective method to reduce joint pressures in both the normal foot and flatfoot. The TN joint does not appear to be substantially affected by flatfoot deformity or the use of orthotics.
Tekscan, Inc., South Boston, MA, USA. KLM Orthotics Laboratory, Valencia, CA, USA
- McCormack AP, et al: Foot Ankle Int. 1998, 19 (7): 452-461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reeck J, et al: Foot Ankle Int. 1998, 19 (10): 674-682.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leung AK, et al: Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998, 22 (1): 25-34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imhauser CW, et al: Foot Ankle Int. 2002, 23 (8): 727-737.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen J: Psychol Bull. 1992, 112: 155-159. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.