Volume 7 Supplement 1

4th Congress of the International Foot and Ankle Biomechanics Community

Open Access

Insole-pressure distribution in three pressure-relief postoperative shoes

  • Paolo Caravaggi1,
  • Alessia Giangrande1,
  • Lisa Berti1,
  • Sandro Giannini1, 2,
  • Carlo Ferraresi3 and
  • Alberto Leardini1
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20147(Suppl 1):A10

DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-7-S1-A10

Published: 8 April 2014

Background

Patients undergoing forefoot surgery often require specific footwear to relieve the operated area. Post-operative footwear can be very different in relation to the amount of weight born by the forefoot [1, 2]. While these special shoes are intended to be worn for short periods following surgery, a compromise must be found between level of comfort and functionality. In this study the insole-pressure distribution of two shoes, specifically designed to unload the forefoot, was compared to that of a comfortable shoe manufactured by the same company.

Material and methods

10 healthy female subjects (28.2 ± 10.0 yrs, 1.64 ± 0.04 m, 55.1 ± 3.7 kg) were asked to walk at comfortable speed wearing three shoe types produced by the same company: WPS®, TD® and Deambulo® (Podartis, Treviso, Italy). WPS® and TD® are post-op shoes designed explicitly for forefoot off-loading, whereas Deambulo® is meant to be worn in the rehabilitation period, about 20/30 days after surgery. An insole pressure measurement system (Pedar X, Novel GmbH, Munich, Germany) was employed to record plantar pressure. Several walking trials were recorded for each subject in three configurations of shoes for left and right foot respectively: WPS® + Deambulo®, TD® + Deambulo® and Deambulo® + Deambulo®. The configurations were established to be consistent with the post-op clinical course when patients wear the pressure-relief shoe on the operated side, and a more comfortable one on the contralateral foot. Mean and peak pressure, vertical force, force and pressure time integral, were recorded for different regions of the insole together with spatiotemporal parameters. For each subject in each configuration, three consistent steps from the same trial were used in the analysis.

Results

Good consistency in the baropodometric measurements was found in each group across all subjects. No difference was detected in walking speed between the three shoe groups. Both WPS® and TD® helped decrease the peak pressure at the forefoot (Fig. 1), with much less variability over subjects in the TD® group. In general, the WPS® showed the smallest pressure and force values under the forefoot and the largest at the midfoot, especially when compared to the Deambulo®. At the rearfoot, force and pressure were the largest in the TD® group.
Figure 1

From left to right: boxplot of the peak pressure at the rearfoot, midfoot and forefoot across 30 samples for each shoe group. * denotes statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between groups.

Conclusions

Both WPS® and TD® helped decrease forefoot pressure thus are indicated for the postoperative course of patients undergoing forefoot surgery. Some load compensation with larger pressures at either the midfoot or rearfoot has been revealed respectively in these two shoes.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Movement Analysis Laboratory, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
(2)
1st Division of orthopedic surgery, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
(3)
DIMEAS, Politecnico di Torino

References

  1. Hans-Dieter C, et al: Assessment of Plantar Pressure in Forefoot Relief Shoes of Different Designs. Foot Ankle Int. 2006, 27: 117-120.Google Scholar
  2. Deleu P-A, et al: Plantar pressure relief using a forefoot offloading shoe. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2010, 16 (4): 178-182. 10.1016/j.fas.2009.10.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Caravaggi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement