Skip to main content

Table 1 Details of the participants in the included studies

From: Effectiveness of therapeutic footwear for children: A systematic review

Study

Duration of Study

Group Intervention and Comparators

n

Condition

Sex No. (%)

Age (mean ± SD)

Mass (mean kg ± SD)

Height (mean m ± SD)

BMI (mean kg/m2 ± SD)

Outcomes

Corrective Therapeutic Footwear

 Chen et al. (2015) [16]

44 months

Group 1 CTF and DB

20

Group 1 to 3 CTEV (not stated if idiopathic)

DiMeglio score ≤Moderate

♂12 (60)

4.9 yrs. ±1.1a

19.2

1.10

Not reported

Skeletal geometry (3D laser scanning)

♀ 8 (40)

3.6

0.11

Biomechanical (plantar pressure)

Group2 DB and Own footwear

15

♂9 (60)

4.7 yrs. ±0.7a

17.7

1.06

♀ 6 (40)

2.5

0.74

Group 3 FAS and CTF

18

♂8 (44)

4.9 yrs. ±1a

19.3

1.10

♀10 (56)

3.8

0.11

 Kanatali et al. (2016)

mean 34.6 ± 10.9 months

Group 1 CTF

21

Flexible pes planus asymptomatic,

♂33 (73)

41.6 monthsc

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Skeletal geometry (radiographic)

Group 2 Own footwear

24

♀12 (27) b

36 monthsc

 Wenger et al. (1989) [37]

3 years

Group 1 CTF

28d

Flexible pes planus

♂16 (57)

32.2 months ±17c

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Skeletal geometry (radiographic)

♀12 (43)

Group 2 SLF

21d

13 (62)

27.2 months ±11.6c

♀8 (38)

Group 3 CTF with Helfet Heel Cup

27d

♂22 (81)

28.7 months ±13.5c

♀5 (19)

Group 4 SLF with UCBL

22d

9 (41)

28.2 months ±10.7c

♀13 (59)

Functional Therapeutic Footwear

Functional Stability

  Abd Elkader et al. (2013) [14]

Within 1 day

Group 1 BF, FSTF

15

Down's syndrome with flexible pes planus

♂11 (36)

3.67 yrs. ±0.72

16.46

1.01 0.069

16.01

Biomechanical (spatiotemporal)

♀14 (47) b,e

2.74

1.67

Group 2 BF, Foot Taping

15

4.06 yrs. 0.88

15.61

0.99 0.032

15.49

1.99

1.47

  Aboutorabi et al. (2014) [11]

Within 1 day

Group 1 BF, FSTF, SLS with FO

30

Flexible pes planus

♂18 (67)

7.87 yrs. ±1.45

31.4

123.06 10.25

20.2

Biomechanical (spatiotemporal)

♀12 (33)

5.74

1.58

Group 2, BF, FSTF, SLS with FO

20

Control, typically developing

♂12 (60)

7.8 yrs. ±1.31

32.81

1.28

19.87

♀8 (40)

 

6.66

.11

1.4

  Bakker et al. (1997) [38]

16 Months

Group 1 FSTF

7

Duchenne muscular dystrophy

♂48 (100)

Age range 5 to 12f

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Secondary outcomes

Group 2 AFO

20

Group 3 SF

6

Group 4 KAFO

5

Group 5 Own footwear

41

  Basta et al (1977) [39]

4 years

Group, 1, BF, FSTF, FSTF with CNP

10

Symptomatic flexible pes planus

Not reported

Age Range 6.5 to 7 yearsf

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Skeletal geometry (radiographic)

Group 2, BF, FSTF, FSTF with CNP,

10

Group 3, BF, FSTF, FSTF with CNP, FSTF with PCNP,

10

Group 4, BF, S, SLF with HB, SLF with CNP, FSTFWS

6

Group 5 and 6 formed from groups 1 to 4, Four participants lost to follow up.

Group 5, BF, FSTF, FSTF with CNP Group

16

6, BF, CNP, with Own footwear

16

Group 7, BF, FSTF, FSTF with CNP,

14

  Jagadamma et al (2009) [40]

Within 1 day

One group AFO and SSF, FSTF+AFO,

5

CP

♂3 (60)

9.7 yrs. ±3.5

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Biomechanical (kinematic, kinetic, spatiotemporal)

♀2 (40)

Range 5.6 to 12.6yrs.

  Knittel and Staheli (1976) [41]

Not Stated

One group, SSF, Various forefoot and Rearfoot sole wedges, Torqheel,

10

In toeing

♂4 (40)

6.25 yrs. ±2.35

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Biomechanical (kinematic)

♀6 (60)

Range 3.5 to 10 yrs.

  Wesdock & Edge (2003) [42]

8 weeks

One group, SSF, SSF and AFO, FSTF+AFO

11

CP

♂4 (36)

7 yrs. ±2.7

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Biomechanical (spatiotemporal)

♀7 (64)

Range 4 to 13.5 yrs.

Subset of Group 1 SSF, SSF and AFO, FSTF+AFO

4

CP Initial standing balance ≥15 seconds

♂3 (75)

6.5 yrs. ±2

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

 

♀1 (25)

Range 4.6 to 9.3 yrs.

Functional Instability

  Ramstrand et al (2008) [43]

8 weeks

One Group FITF 8wk training program

10

CP + otherg

♂6 (60)

13.8 yrs. ±2.7

51.71 11.18

1.59

Not Reported

Biomechanical (balance: static, dynamic)

♀4 (40)

Range 10 to 17 yrs.

0.11

Functional Lift

  Eek et al (2017)

Within 1 day

Group 1 BF, SSF, FLTF

10

Spastic CP with LLD ≥1cm

♂6 (60)

10.9 yrs. Range 7.8 to 12.8

38.6

1.42,

Not Reported

Biomechanical (kinematic, spatiotemporal)

♀4 (40)

Range 25.7-59.0

Range 1.24-1.52

Group 2 BF, SSF

10

Control typically developing

♂5 (50)

10.7yrs

35.1

1.48

♀5 (50)

Range 7.1 to 14

Range 18.7-49

Range 1.20-1.67

  Zabjek et al (2001) [44]

Within 1 day

One Group, BF, FLTF

46

Idiopathic scoliosis

♂9 (19.6)

12yrs. ±2

Not Reported

Not Reported

Not Reported

Skeletal Geometry (3D stereovideographic)

♀37 (80.4)

  1. Male, Female AFO Ankle Foot Orthosis, BF Barefoot, CNP Customised Navicular Pad, CP Cerebral Palsy, CTEV Congenital Talipes Equino Varus, CTF Corrective Therapeutic Footwear, DB Dennis Brown Splinted Footwear, FAS Forefoot Abduction Night Shoe, FIFT Functional Instability Therapeutic Footwear, FLTF Functional Lift Therapeutic Footwear, FSTF Functional Stability Therapeutic Footwear, FSTFWS Functional Stability Therapeutic Footwear Without Steel Shank, GMSF Gross Motor Functioning Score, HB heel block, KAFO Knee Ankle Foot Orthoses, LLD Limb Length Difference, PNP Prefabricated Navicular Pad, SF Standing Frame, SLF Standard Last Footwear, SSF Standard Sole Footwear, UCBL University of California Biomechanics Laboratory custom moulded Insert, aAge When tested, b Sex distribution amongst groups not reported, c Age at entry of study, dNumbers at end of study, emissing 17% Sex distribution not accounted for, f age range distribution amongst groups not reported, g variety of neurological and developmental conditions within group.