From: Validity and reliability of hallux valgus angle measurement on smartphone digital photographs
Variables | Intra-observer Reliability | ICC (95% CI) | Interpretation |
---|---|---|---|
rHVA | Observer A t 1 vs.t 2 | 0.974 (0.953-0.986) | Excellent |
Observer B t 1 vs.t 2 | 0.931 (0.878-0.961) | Excellent | |
pHVA | Observer A t 1 vs.t 2 | 0.908 (0.832-0.949) | Excellent |
Observer B t 1 vs.t 2 | 0.915 (0.850-0.952) | Excellent | |
pMMP | Observer A t 1 vs.t 2 | 0.937 (0.888-0.965) | Excellent |
Observer B t 1 vs.t 2 | 0.953 (0.916-0.974) | Excellent | |
Inter-observer Reliability | |||
Observer A t 1 vs. B t 2 | 0.935 (0.885-0.964) | Excellent | |
rHVA | Observer A t 2 vs.t 2 | 0.971 (0.948-0.984) | Excellent |
Observer A t 1 vs.t 1 | 0.907 (0.830-0.949) | Excellent | |
pHVA | Observer A t 2 vs. B t 2 | 0.923 (0.860-0.958) | Excellent |
Observer A t 1 vs.t 1 | 0.961 (0.931-0.979) | Excellent | |
pMMP | Observer A t 2 vs. B t 2 | 0.938 (0.890-0.965) | Excellent |
Observer A t 1 vs.t 2 | 0.974 (0.953-0.986) | Excellent |