Skip to main content

Table 1 Intra and inter-observer reliability of the repeated measurements by the observers

From: Validity and reliability of hallux valgus angle measurement on smartphone digital photographs

Variables

Intra-observer Reliability

ICC (95% CI)

Interpretation

rHVA

Observer A t 1 vs.t 2

0.974 (0.953-0.986)

Excellent

Observer B t 1 vs.t 2

0.931 (0.878-0.961)

Excellent

pHVA

Observer A t 1 vs.t 2

0.908 (0.832-0.949)

Excellent

Observer B t 1 vs.t 2

0.915 (0.850-0.952)

Excellent

pMMP

Observer A t 1 vs.t 2

0.937 (0.888-0.965)

Excellent

Observer B t 1 vs.t 2

0.953 (0.916-0.974)

Excellent

 

Inter-observer Reliability

  

Observer A t 1 vs. B t 2

0.935 (0.885-0.964)

Excellent

rHVA

Observer A t 2 vs.t 2

0.971 (0.948-0.984)

Excellent

Observer A t 1 vs.t 1

0.907 (0.830-0.949)

Excellent

pHVA

Observer A t 2 vs. B t 2

0.923 (0.860-0.958)

Excellent

Observer A t 1 vs.t 1

0.961 (0.931-0.979)

Excellent

pMMP

Observer A t 2 vs. B t 2

0.938 (0.890-0.965)

Excellent

Observer A t 1 vs.t 2

0.974 (0.953-0.986)

Excellent

  1. Abbreviations rHVA radiographic hallux valgus angle, pHVA photographic hallux valgus angle, pMMP photographic margo medialis pedis, ICC Interclass correlation coefficient, t1 Time 1, t2 Time 2, CI Confidence interval