Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of the non-randomized studies with the MINORS criteria

From: Effect of surgical approach on the treatment of Morton’s neuroma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First Author

Year

Design

MINORSa

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Total

Xu

2022

RC

2

1

0

1

0

2

2

0

8

Faraj

2010

RC

2

2

0

2

0

2

2

0

10

Åkermark

2008

RC

2

2

0

1

0

2

0

0

7

Wilson

1995

RC

2

1

0

1

0

2

2

0

8

  1. Abbreviations: MINORS methodological index for non-randomized studies, RC retrospective comparative
  2. aOnly the noncomparative part of the MINORS criteria was used (ie, first 8 questions): (1) a clearly stated aim, (2) inclusion of consecutive patients, (3) prospective collection of data, (4) end points appropriate to the aim of the study, (5) unbiased assessment of the study end point, (6) follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study, (7) Loss to follow up less than 5%, and (8) prospective calculation of the study size. Score and Risk: 0, high risk; 1, medium risk; 2, low risk. Maximum score: 16