Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics, univariate regression, and multivariate regression of investigated variables in relation to daily wearing time

From: Objectively assessed long-term wearing patterns and predictors of wearing orthopaedic footwear in people with diabetes at moderate-to-high risk of foot ulceration: a 12 months observational study

Characteristic

Mean (SD)

% (N)

Wearing time Mean (SD)

Univariate regression

Multivariate regression

B

β

p-value

β

p-value

Demographics

Gender

 Male

 

72 (44)

7.9 (5.9)

     

 Female

 

28 (17)

9.4 (6.2)

2.03

0.21

0.100a

0.12

0.356

Age (years)

68.0 (7.4)

100 (61)

8.3 (6.1)

0.13

0.22

0.083a

0.13

0.322

BMI

30.5 (5.7)

100 (61)

8.3 (6.1)

-0.14

-0.19

0.145a

-0.15

0.242

Education level

 Low

 

49 (30)

9.6 (5.8)

     

 Medium/High

 

51 (31)

7.1 (6.0)

-2.95

-0.34

0.007a

-0.19

0.138

Working situation

 Paid work

 

28 (17)

7.8 (6.3)

     

 No paid work

 

72 (44)

8.5 (6.0)

0.88

0.09

0.480

  

Living situation

 Living with someone

 

71 (43)

8.2 (6.1)

     

 Living alone

 

30 (18)

8.5 (5.8)

0.11

0.01

0.926

  

Self-reliant

 Yes

 

16 (10)

8.3 (5.6)

     

 No

 

84 (51)

8.3 (6.1)

-0.37

-0.03

0.809

  

Dependence on assistive device

 Yes

 

34 (21)

8.2 (6.1)

     

 No

 

66 (40)

8.4 (6.0)

0.40

0.04

0.735

  

Disease characteristics

Diabetes type

 Type 1

 

11 (7)

7.8 (6.3)

     

 Type 2

 

89 (54)

8.4 (6.0)

0.44

0.03

0.801

  

Diabetes duration (years)

17.3 (11.4)

  

0.05

0.14

0.303

  

IWGDF risk profile

 IWGDF risk 2

 

44 (27)

8.5 (6.1)

     

 IWGDF risk 3

 

56 (34)

8.1 (6.0)

-0.82

-0.10

0.465

  

Footwear usability

Walking ability

 < 1000 m

 

70 (35)

8.1 (6.0)

     

 ≥ 1000 m

 

30 (15)

8.8 (6.3)

0.41

0.04

0.762

  

Perceived walking change by OF

 Improved by orthopaedic footwear

 

52 (26)

9.2 (5.7)

     

 Not improved by orthopaedic footwear

 

48 (24)

7.2 (6.4)

-1.56

-0.18

0.207

  

Shoe fitc

80.7 (18.4)

82 (50)

8.3 (6.1)

0.03

0.11

0.461

  

Shoe walkingc

78.6 (24.5)

80 (49)

8.3 (6.1)

0.04

0.24

0.093a

-0.18

0.283

Shoe weightc

56.5 (22.0)

79 (48)

8.3 (6.1)

-0.05

-0.25

0.086a

-0.02

0.884

Donning and doffingc

68.0 (26.3)

79 (48)

8.4 (6.1)

0.005

0.03

0.852

  

Aestheticc

75.9 (21.0)

80 (49)

8.3 (6.1)

 < 0.001

0.01

0.975

  

Aesthetic perceived by others

 

84 (51)

      

 Not attractive

 

43 (22)

7.8 (5.8)

     

 Attractive

 

57 (29)

8.7 (6.3)

0.80

0.09

0.514

  

Number of orthopaedic footwear pairs

2.9 (1.1)

100 (61)

8.3 (6.1)

0.65

0.17

0.204

  

Footwear possession

 First-ever pair

 

13.1 (8)

9.3 (5.8)

     

 Subsequent pair

 

86.9 (53)

8.2 (6.1)

-0.47

-0.04

0.776

  

Owns regular off-the-shelf shoes

 Yes

 

20 (12)

6.2 (5.6)

     

 No

 

80 (49)

8.9 (6.0)

2.34

0.22

0.093a

0.15

0.238

Satisfaction with my wear of orthopaedic footwearc

80.1 (20.9)

82 (50)

8.3 (6.1)

0.11

0.52

 < 0.001a

0.55

 < 0.001b

Orthopaedic footwear wearing goal reached

 Yes

 

81 (39)

8.8 (6.1)

     

 No

 

19 (9)

6.1 (5.6)

-1.85

-0.17

0.264

  
  1. Percentages may not added up to 100 due to rounding
  2. Abbreviations: SD standard deviation, B unstandardized coefficients, β standardized coefficients, BMI body mass index, IWGDF International working group on the diabetic foot
  3. aVariables with p-values < 0.20 in the univariate regression were entered in the multivariate regression model
  4. bp < 0.05 in the multivariate regression analysis. Multivariate regression model F(1,44) = 18.64, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.28
  5. cScores could range from 0 (lowest/most negative score possible) to 100 (highest/most positive score possible)