Skip to main content

Table 5 Validity and responsiveness results

From: Elastography in the assessment of the Achilles tendon: a systematic review of measurement properties

Outcome Measurement Instrument

Author and year

Construct validity

 

Responsiveness

Study population

Cosmin Rate

Statistical Results

Measurement property ratings based on statistical results

Cosmin Rate

Measurement property ratings based on statistical results

Strain elastography

Ooi et al., 2015 [27]

120 control120 with AT

Very good

ultrasonography vs strain ratio spearman = 0.81 strain ratio vs VISA-A r = -0.62, p < 0.001

 + 

NA

NA

Yamamoto et al., 2016 [34]

50 bilateral

Very good

No significant difference between age groups except for the 30age group

-

Very good

 + 

Schneebeli et al., 2019 [36]

37 bilateral

Very good

Friedman test p < 0.01 significant difference

 + 

NA

NA

Schneebeli et al., 2021 [37]

20 bilateral

Very good

Friedman test p < 0.01 significant difference

 + 

NA

NA

Shear wave elastography—velocity

Aubry et al., 2013 [38]

80 bilateral

Adequate

Univariate analysis

 + 

NA

NA

DeWall et al., 2014 [39]

10

Adequate

Three-way ANOVA for posture, path & region

 + 

NA

NA

Aubry et al., 2015 [28]

30 pathological, 180 healthy

Adequate

Normal had significantly lower mean velocity than AT axial SW for plantarflexion (P < .001), at sagittal SW for 0° (P = .001), and at axial SW for 0° (P = .0026)

 + 

NA

NA

Fu et al., 2016 [40]

326 bilateral

Adequate

Pearson—no significant correlation of SW velocity with age

-

NA

NA

Dirrichs et al., 2016 [29]

41 bilateral

Adequate

SW velocity correlates to VISA-A

 + 

NA

NA

Coombes et al., 2018 [30]

50 right or left, healthy and AT

Adequate

AT lower SW velocity at insertion (P < .001), but not mid-tendon region (P = .456)

 + 

NA

NA

Shear wave elastography—modulus

Helfenstein-Didier et al., 2016 [41]

10 right

Adequate

Pearson = 0.844 SW elastography to dispersion analysis confirming the guided wave propagation

 + 

NA

NA

Lima et al., 2017 [42]

24 healthy- bilateral

Adequate

Pearson = 0.00–0.041 no correlation to isometric contraction

-

NA

NA

Schneebeli et al., 2021 [37]

20 bilateral

Very good

Friedman test p < 0.05

-

NA

NA

Gatz et al., 2021 [31]

75

Adequate

Diagnostic—No significant difference (P = .062-.994) in favour one modality

 + 

Very good

 

cSWE

Suydam et al., 2015 [44]

29 bilateral

Adequate

Pearson < 0.12 between shear modulus and MVIC

-

NA

NA

Corrigan et al., 2019 [45]

6 right

Adequate

Pearson s = 0.992, p = 0.008, v = 0.994, p = 0.006, d = 0.997, p = 0.003

 + 

NA

NA

  1. NA Znot applicable, SW Shear wave, MVIC Maximum voluntary isometric contraction