Skip to main content

Table 3 Baseline participant characteristics

From: A randomised feasibility study of serial magnetic resonance imaging to reduce treatment times in Charcot neuroarthropathy in people with diabetes (CADOM)

Baseline participant characteristics

All participants

Confirmed diagnosis of Charcot

All randomised participants

[n = 43]

Confirmed diagnosis Charcot

[n = 30]

Standard care plus

(n = 16)

Intervention

(n = 14)

Sociodemographic

 Men n [%]

29 [67%]

20 [67%]

12 [75%]

8 [57%]

 Age (yrs) mean ± SD

59.1 ± 11.2

59.2 ± 10.8

59.2 ± 9.4

51.5 ± 10.8

Highest education n [%]

n = 37

n = 27

n = 13

n = 14

 Left school before 16

4 [11%]

2 [7%]

1 [8%]

1 [7%]

 Stayed in school until 16

11 [30%]

8 [30%]

4 [31%]

4 [29%]

 Stayed in education until 18

6 [16%]

4 [15%]

3 [23%]

1 [7%]

 Vocational/occupational qualification

8 [22%]

7 [30%]

2 [15%]

5 [36%]

 Degree

6 [16%]

4 [15%]

2 [15%]

2 [14%]

 Masters

1 [3%]

1 [4%]

1 [8%]

0

 Doctorate

1 [3%]

1 [4%]

0

1 [7%]

Diabetes and diabetes related complications

 Type 2 diabetes n [%]

34 [79%]

22 [73%]

12 [75%]

10 [71%]

 Duration of diabetes (yrs) mean ± SD

19 ± 11.2

20.5 ± 11.3

24.6 ± 13

15.8 ± 6.7

 HbA1c mmol/mol median [25th–75th IQR]

69

IQR 57–87

77.5

IQR 60–96

73.5

IQR 61–84

77.5

IQR 59–99

eGFR < 60 n [%]

13 [30%]

9 [30%]

3 [19%]

6 [43%]

 Type 1 BMI mean ± SD

30.9 ± 6.3

32.1 ± 5.4

33.8 ± 5.9

30.6 ± 5.1

 Type 2 BMI mean ± SD

32.5 ± 7.0

32.1 ± 6.5

32.2 ± 7.7

32.2 ± 5.2

 Cerebrovascular events n [%]

4 [9%]

2 [7%]

1 [6%]

1 [7%]

 Cardiovascular events n [%]

10 [23%]

6 [20%]

2 [13%]

4 [29%]

 Nephropathy n [%]

11 [26%]

9 [30%]

2 [13%]

7 [50%]

 Retinopathy n [%]

18 [42%]

14 [47%]

10 [63%]

4 [29%]

Palpation foot pulses n [%]

 No foot pulses palpable

4 [9%]

3 [10%]

1 [6%]

2 [14%]

 One-foot pulse palpable

1 [2%]

0

0

0

 Two-foot pulses palpable

38 [88%]

27 [90%]

15 [94%]

12 [86%]

Ankle Brachial Index n [%]

n = 41

n = 28

n = 15

n = 12

 Ankle Brachial Index 0.5–0.79

1 [2%]

1 [4%]

1 [4%]

0

 Ankle Brachial Index 0.8–0.99

4 [10%]

3 [11%]

0

3 [25%]

 Ankle Brachial Index 1.0–1.4

31 [76%]

22 [79%]

13 [81%]

9 [75%]

 Ankle Brachial Index > 1.4

5 [12%]

2 [7%]

2 [13%]

0

Monofilament perception n [%]

 -ve at 3/3 sites

33 [77%]

24 [80%]

13 [81%]

11 [79%]

 -ve at 2/3 sites

4 [9%]

0

0

0

 -ve at 1/3 sites

1 [2%]

2 [7%]

1 [6%]

1 [7%]

 +ve at all sites n [%]

5 [12%]

4 [13%]

2 [13%]

2 [14%]

Mean vibration perception at hallux

n = 29

n = 22

n = 11

n = 11

 Hallux (≥25 V)

23 [79%]

19 [86%]

10 [91%]

9 [82%]

Previous or current foot complications n [%]

 Previous minor amputation index foot

7 [16%]

5 [17%]

4 [25%]

1 [7%]

 Previous minor amputation contralateral foot

5 [12%]

4 [13%]

3 [19%]

1 [7%]

 History of previous Charcot either foot

6 [14%]

6 [20%]

3 [19%]

3 [21%]

 Ulceration at enrolment on index foot

12 [30%]

7 [23%]

5 [31%]

2 [14%]

 Ulceration at enrolment on contralateral foot

1 [2%]

0

0

0

  1. Abbreviations: BMI Body mass index, eGFR Estimated Glomerular Filtration rate, ml/min, HbA1c Glycated haemoglobin (A1c), mmol/mol