Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of CAST MFM and OFM ability to detect the effect of medial heel bar

From: Do different multi-segment foot models detect the same changes in kinematics when wearing foot orthoses?

 

DS1

SS

DS2

Total

Sagittal

Coronal

Transverse

Sagittal

Coronal

Transverse

Sagittal

Coronal

Transverse

Hindfoot (%)

 CAST MFM

10.9

4.7

10.9

10.9

7.8

6.3

1.6

4.7

6.3

7.1

 OFM

14.1

4.7

0.0

14.1

0.0

3.1

14.1

6.3

0.0

6.3

 No kinematic change

20.3

10.9

32.8

14.1

4.7

39.1

15.6

39.1

53.1

25.5

 Opposite effect

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.6

0.0

0.0

0.2

 Same kinematic change

54.7

79.7

56.3

60.9

87.5

51.6

67.2

50.0

40.6

60.9

Forefoot (%)

 CAST

14.1

10.9

17.2

10.9

3.1

29.7

7.8

7.8

51.6

17.0

 OFM

14.1

1.6

9.4

17.2

7.8

10.9

7.8

3.1

7.8

8.9

 No kinematic change

1.6

1.6

4.7

0.0

0.0

4.7

1.6

6.3

6.3

3.0

 Opposite effect

25.0

4.7

46.9

37.5

4.7

35.9

32.8

4.7

14.1

22.9

 Same kinematic change

45.3

81.3

21.9

34.4

84.4

18.8

50.0

78.1

20.3

48.3

  1. DS1 First double support, DS2 Second double support, SS Single support, OFM Oxford Foot Model, CAST Calibrated Anatomical System Technique, MFM Multi-segment foot model