Skip to main content

Table 2 Multiple logistic regression analysis based on characteristics and physical data of the participants (n = 54)

From: Toe grip force of the dominant foot is associated with fall risk in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study

 

Model 1

   

95% CI

 

Independent variable

p

SRCβ

OR

Lower

Upper

VIF

Age

0.814

−0.020

0.980

0.827

1.161

1.388

Sex

0.451

−0.804

0.448

0.055

3.618

1.232

MMSE

0.208

0.369

1.446

0.814

2.570

1.129

TPDS (HONDF)

0.054

−0.118

0.089

0.788

1.002

1.157

TGF (DF)

0.027

0.257

1.293

1.030

1.624

5.415

TGF (Non-DF)

0.118

−0.164

0.849

0.691

1.042

5.316

 

Model 2

   

95% CI

 

Independent variable

p

SRCβ

OR

Lower

Upper

VIF

Age

0.378

−0.069

0.934

0.802

1.087

1.227

Sex

0.553

−0.528

0.590

0.103

3.376

1.130

MMSE

0.187

0.342

1.407

0.847

2.338

1.174

TPDS thenar asymmetry

0.295

−0.016

0.984

0.954

1.014

1.096

TPDS heel asymmetry

0.865

−0.002

0.998

0.978

1.019

1.113

QFMS asymmetry

0.992

−0.001

1.000

0.908

1.100

1.094

TGF asymmetry

0.289

0.041

1.042

0.966

1.125

1.187

  1. SRCβ standardization regression coefficient, OR odds ratio, 95% CI confidence interval, VIF variance inflation factor, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, TPDS two-point discrimination sensory, HONDF heel of non-dominant foot, TGF toe grip force, DF dominant foot, Non-DF non-dominant foot