Skip to main content

Table 6 Dynamic foot variables in participants with KOA (data reported as mean ± standard deviation)

From: Foot characteristics and mechanics in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Study, year of publish

Foot variable (outcome)

Instrument- Shod condition

Results

P-value

KOA

Controls

Al-Zahrani and Bakheit 2002 [19]

Ankle plantar flexion in stance (°)**

3D motion analysis system, force platform- Barefoot

19.01 (15.90 to 22.70)**

30.88 (23.50 to 35.60)**

< 0.12

Ankle plantar flexion in swing (°)**

27.76 (17.70 to 26.40)**

22.74 (15.90 to 22.70)**

< 0.02*

Ankle moment (pre-swing) (Nm/kg)**

0.57 (0.36 to 0.78)**

0.79 (0.61 to 0.91)**

< 0.002*

Ankle power (pre-swing) (Watt/k.)**

1.46 (0.53 to 2.31)**

3.86 (2.91 to 4.58)**

< 0.000*

Anan et al., 2015 [20]

Maximum ankle plantar flexion moment during STS (Nm/kg)

3D motion analysis system, force platform-

Barefoot

0.36 ± 0.07

0.34 ± 0.07

0.343

Mean ankle plantar flexion moment during STS (Nm/kg)

0.23 ± 0.06

0.24 ± 0.08

0.685

Ankle planter flexion moment impulse during STS (Nms/kg)

0.47 ± 0.16

0.38 ± 0.15

0.072

Arnold et al., 2014 [21]

Hindfoot conronal plane ROM (o)

3D motion analysis system, force platform- Barefoot

10.9 ± 3.4

10.9 ± 4.3

0.562

Butler et al., 2009 [24]

Rearfoot eversion excursion (o)

3D motion analysis system, force platform- Wearing lab shoes

10.1 ± 2.8

No controls

NA

−0.030 ± 0.034

  

Peak rearfoot eversion moment (Nm/kg*m)

Butler et al., 2011 [25]

Peak rearfoot inversion moment (Nm/kg*m)

3D motion analysis system, force platform- Wearing lab shoes

−0.050 ±

− 0.062 ±

0.38

Rearfoot eversion excursion (o)

0.045

0.03

0.96

10.6 ± 5.6

10.2 ± 3.7

 

Charlton et al. 2018 [28]

Foot rotation angle during natural walking:

3D motion analysis system- Barefoot

   

Ipsilateral foot (°)

−7.8 ± 7.9

No controls

NA

Contralateral foot (°)

−8.4 ± 5.7

  

Gardner et al., 2007 [31]

Planter flexion angle during cycling (o)

3D motion analysis system, force platform- Wearing lab shoes

−6.0 ± 8.5

− 8.9 ± 10.7

0.834

Ankle eversion during cycling (o)

−6.8 ± 8.5

−13.2 ± 8.4

0.015*

Internal rotation angle (o)

8.1 ± 7.1

9.2 ± 7.6

0.849

Guo et al., 2007 [33]

FPA during stair ascent (o)

3D motion analysis system, force platform- Wearing lab shoes

2.5 ± 6.6

No controls

NA

FPA during stair descent (o)

11.3 ± 8.9

  

Hinman et al., 2012 [34]

COP offset (mm)

3D motion analysis system, force platform- Wearing lab shoes

−5.6 ± 4.3

No controls

NA

Levinger et al.,2012a [39]

Ankle dorsiflexion (o)

3D motion analysis system, force platform-Barefoot

3.6 ± 3.3

2.4 ± 2.8

0.08

Ankle adduction (0)

2.8 ± 1.9

4.2 ± 2.1

0.01*

Toe clearance sensitivity in ankle (mm/degrees)

−0.1 ± 3.5

1.1 ± 4.5

0.05*

Levinger et al., 2012b [40]

Rearfoot frontal plane ROM (o)

3D motion analysis system, force platform- Barefoot

10.2 ± 3.3

12.5 ± 3.1

NR

Rearfoot transverse plane ROM (o)

8.8 ± 4.7

10.0 ± 4.9

NR

Internal rotation (o)

11.7 ± 6.3

15.4 ± 7.9

NR

External rotation (o)

2.9 ± 5.8

5.4 ± 6.1

NR

Lidtke et al., 2010 [41]

COP index

Plantar pressure plate- Barefoot

−5.87 ± 5.6

−0.45 ± 3.45

< 0.001*

Nigg et al., 2006 [42]

Ankle plantar flexion (o)

Biodex system- Wearing lab shoes

50.6

No controls

NA

Ankle dorsiflexion (o)

22.2

  

Park et al., 2016 [45]

MVIC of ankle inversion muscle group (N/kg)

Force dynamometer- Wearing lab shoes

0.62 ± 0.26

0.86 ± 0.31

0.007*

Reilly et al., 2006 [46]

Ankle Plantar flexion in sitting (°)

Objective manual testing (goniometer)- Barefoot

50.72 ± 11.49

52.13 ± 10.94

0.788

Ankle dorsiflexion in sitting (°)

10.07 ± 4.29

8.4 ± 3.71

0.000*

Calcaneal angle in sitting (°)

2.02 ± 2.04

−0.25 ± 2.93

0.000*

Saito et al., 2013 [50]

Partial foot pressure per body weight (%)

Plantar pressure sensor insoles during walking- Wearing lab shoes

   

Heel

27.1 ± 11.2

41.7 ± 8.5

< 0.001*

Central

33.1 ± 11.2

16.5 ± 13.8

< 0.001*

Metatarsal

12.4 ± 7.9

12.1 ± 6.7

> 0.001

Hallux

1.5 ± 2.2

3.5 ± 3.0

< 0.001*

Lateral toes

1.2 ± 1.7

2.5 ± 2.1

> 0.001

Tan et al., 2020 [53]

Peak dorsiflexion angle in stance (°) during walking

3D motion analysis system, force platform-Wearing lab shoes

14.9 ± 3.2

No controls

NA

Peak dorsiflexion moment (Nm/kg) during walking

 

0.15 ± 0.27

  

Peak dorsiflexion angle in stance (°) stair ascent / descent.

 

9.7 ± 4.4

  

Peak dorsiflexion moment (Nm/kg) stair ascent / descent.

 

1.08 ± 0.22

  

Weight bearing ankle joint dorsiflexion ROM (cm)

Knee to wall test

9.1 ± 3.2

  

Zhang et al., 2017 [56]

Contact area (cm2)

Plantar pressure sensor insoles during walking- Wearing lab shoes

   

Heel

28.9 ± 2.9

28.6 ± 1.7

0.982

Midfoot

41.5 ± 5.8

36.5 ± 7.3

0.043*

1st MTPJ

13.8 ± 1.6

13.1 ± 1.3

0.875

2nd MTPJ

13.6 ± 0.8

13.2 ± 1.3

0.922

3rd-5th MTPJ

12.7 ± 0.6

12.8 ± 0.3

0.986

Hallux

7.1 ± 1.7

6.6 ± 1.6

0.684

Lesser toes

10.3 ± 1.1

10.8 ± 0.4

0.988

Maximum force (%BW)

    

Heel

69.5 ± 15.2

67.1 ± 11.3

0.817

Midfoot

30.3 ± 7.1

23.6 ± 7.4

0.43

1st MTPJ

32.3 ± 7.1

26.5 ± 6.2

0.037*

2nd MTPJ

35.2 ± 9.1

30.3 ± 5.1

0.041*

3rd-5th MTPJ

17.7 ± 5.4

16.7 ± 4.9

0.843

Hallux

14.3 ± 6.5

13.5 ± 5.6

0.901

Lesser toes

12.0 ± 4.7

12.6 ± 3.2

0.973

Plantar pressure (kPa)

    

Heel

252.9 ± 52.5

243.7 ± 52.5

0.581

Midfoot

132.8 ± 28.3

116.5 ± 30.0

0.031*

1st MTPJ

295.1 ± 100.4

224.3 ± 62.4

0.024*

2nd MTPJ

273.8 ± 103.9

244.6 ± 56.1

0.183

3rd-5th MTPJ

156.1 ± 43.1

157.9 ± 49.3

0.981

Hallux

231.9 ± 77.6

219.6 ± 79.4

0.531

Lesser toes

139.4 ± 49.4

142.9 ± 44.9

0.801

  1. *Statistically significant p-value at 95% confidence interval
  2. ** Data reported as median (interquartile range)
  3. Abbreviations: 3D three-dimensional, %BW percent bodyweight, AP anteroposterior, COP centre of pressure, KOA knee osteoarthritis, NA not applicable, NR not reported, MVIC maximum voluntary isometric contraction, MTPJ metatarsophalangeal joint, ROM range of motion, STS sit-to-stand