Study, year of publish | Foot variable (outcome) | Instrument- Shod condition | Results | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
KOA | Controls | ||||
Al-Zahrani and Bakheit 2002 [19] | Ankle plantar flexion in stance (°)** | 3D motion analysis system, force platform- Barefoot | 19.01 (15.90 to 22.70)** | 30.88 (23.50 to 35.60)** | < 0.12 |
Ankle plantar flexion in swing (°)** | 27.76 (17.70 to 26.40)** | 22.74 (15.90 to 22.70)** | < 0.02* | ||
Ankle moment (pre-swing) (Nm/kg)** | 0.57 (0.36 to 0.78)** | 0.79 (0.61 to 0.91)** | < 0.002* | ||
Ankle power (pre-swing) (Watt/k.)** | 1.46 (0.53 to 2.31)** | 3.86 (2.91 to 4.58)** | < 0.000* | ||
Anan et al., 2015 [20] | Maximum ankle plantar flexion moment during STS (Nm/kg) | 3D motion analysis system, force platform- Barefoot | 0.36 ± 0.07 | 0.34 ± 0.07 | 0.343 |
Mean ankle plantar flexion moment during STS (Nm/kg) | 0.23 ± 0.06 | 0.24 ± 0.08 | 0.685 | ||
Ankle planter flexion moment impulse during STS (Nms/kg) | 0.47 ± 0.16 | 0.38 ± 0.15 | 0.072 | ||
Arnold et al., 2014 [21] | Hindfoot conronal plane ROM (o) | 3D motion analysis system, force platform- Barefoot | 10.9 ± 3.4 | 10.9 ± 4.3 | 0.562 |
Butler et al., 2009 [24] | Rearfoot eversion excursion (o) | 3D motion analysis system, force platform- Wearing lab shoes | 10.1 ± 2.8 | No controls | NA |
−0.030 ± 0.034 |  |  | |||
Peak rearfoot eversion moment (Nm/kg*m) | |||||
Butler et al., 2011 [25] | Peak rearfoot inversion moment (Nm/kg*m) | 3D motion analysis system, force platform- Wearing lab shoes | −0.050 ± | − 0.062 ± | 0.38 |
Rearfoot eversion excursion (o) | 0.045 | 0.03 | 0.96 | ||
10.6 ± 5.6 | 10.2 ± 3.7 |  | |||
Charlton et al. 2018 [28] | Foot rotation angle during natural walking: | 3D motion analysis system- Barefoot | Â | Â | Â |
Ipsilateral foot (°) | −7.8 ± 7.9 | No controls | NA | ||
Contralateral foot (°) | −8.4 ± 5.7 |  |  | ||
Gardner et al., 2007 [31] | Planter flexion angle during cycling (o) | 3D motion analysis system, force platform- Wearing lab shoes | −6.0 ± 8.5 | − 8.9 ± 10.7 | 0.834 |
Ankle eversion during cycling (o) | −6.8 ± 8.5 | −13.2 ± 8.4 | 0.015* | ||
Internal rotation angle (o) | 8.1 ± 7.1 | 9.2 ± 7.6 | 0.849 | ||
Guo et al., 2007 [33] | FPA during stair ascent (o) | 3D motion analysis system, force platform- Wearing lab shoes | 2.5 ± 6.6 | No controls | NA |
FPA during stair descent (o) | 11.3 ± 8.9 |  |  | ||
Hinman et al., 2012 [34] | COP offset (mm) | 3D motion analysis system, force platform- Wearing lab shoes | −5.6 ± 4.3 | No controls | NA |
Levinger et al.,2012a [39] | Ankle dorsiflexion (o) | 3D motion analysis system, force platform-Barefoot | 3.6 ± 3.3 | 2.4 ± 2.8 | 0.08 |
Ankle adduction (0) | 2.8 ± 1.9 | 4.2 ± 2.1 | 0.01* | ||
Toe clearance sensitivity in ankle (mm/degrees) | −0.1 ± 3.5 | 1.1 ± 4.5 | 0.05* | ||
Levinger et al., 2012b [40] | Rearfoot frontal plane ROM (o) | 3D motion analysis system, force platform- Barefoot | 10.2 ± 3.3 | 12.5 ± 3.1 | NR |
Rearfoot transverse plane ROM (o) | 8.8 ± 4.7 | 10.0 ± 4.9 | NR | ||
Internal rotation (o) | 11.7 ± 6.3 | 15.4 ± 7.9 | NR | ||
External rotation (o) | 2.9 ± 5.8 | 5.4 ± 6.1 | NR | ||
Lidtke et al., 2010 [41] | COP index | Plantar pressure plate- Barefoot | −5.87 ± 5.6 | −0.45 ± 3.45 | < 0.001* |
Nigg et al., 2006 [42] | Ankle plantar flexion (o) | Biodex system- Wearing lab shoes | 50.6 | No controls | NA |
Ankle dorsiflexion (o) | 22.2 | Â | Â | ||
Park et al., 2016 [45] | MVIC of ankle inversion muscle group (N/kg) | Force dynamometer- Wearing lab shoes | 0.62 ± 0.26 | 0.86 ± 0.31 | 0.007* |
Reilly et al., 2006 [46] | Ankle Plantar flexion in sitting (°) | Objective manual testing (goniometer)- Barefoot | 50.72 ± 11.49 | 52.13 ± 10.94 | 0.788 |
Ankle dorsiflexion in sitting (°) | 10.07 ± 4.29 | 8.4 ± 3.71 | 0.000* | ||
Calcaneal angle in sitting (°) | 2.02 ± 2.04 | −0.25 ± 2.93 | 0.000* | ||
Saito et al., 2013 [50] | Partial foot pressure per body weight (%) | Plantar pressure sensor insoles during walking- Wearing lab shoes | Â | Â | Â |
Heel | 27.1 ± 11.2 | 41.7 ± 8.5 | < 0.001* | ||
Central | 33.1 ± 11.2 | 16.5 ± 13.8 | < 0.001* | ||
Metatarsal | 12.4 ± 7.9 | 12.1 ± 6.7 | > 0.001 | ||
Hallux | 1.5 ± 2.2 | 3.5 ± 3.0 | < 0.001* | ||
Lateral toes | 1.2 ± 1.7 | 2.5 ± 2.1 | > 0.001 | ||
Tan et al., 2020 [53] | Peak dorsiflexion angle in stance (°) during walking | 3D motion analysis system, force platform-Wearing lab shoes | 14.9 ± 3.2 | No controls | NA |
Peak dorsiflexion moment (Nm/kg) during walking |  | 0.15 ± 0.27 |  |  | |
Peak dorsiflexion angle in stance (°) stair ascent / descent. |  | 9.7 ± 4.4 |  |  | |
Peak dorsiflexion moment (Nm/kg) stair ascent / descent. |  | 1.08 ± 0.22 |  |  | |
Weight bearing ankle joint dorsiflexion ROM (cm) | Knee to wall test | 9.1 ± 3.2 |  |  | |
Zhang et al., 2017 [56] | Contact area (cm2) | Plantar pressure sensor insoles during walking- Wearing lab shoes | Â | Â | Â |
Heel | 28.9 ± 2.9 | 28.6 ± 1.7 | 0.982 | ||
Midfoot | 41.5 ± 5.8 | 36.5 ± 7.3 | 0.043* | ||
1st MTPJ | 13.8 ± 1.6 | 13.1 ± 1.3 | 0.875 | ||
2nd MTPJ | 13.6 ± 0.8 | 13.2 ± 1.3 | 0.922 | ||
3rd-5th MTPJ | 12.7 ± 0.6 | 12.8 ± 0.3 | 0.986 | ||
Hallux | 7.1 ± 1.7 | 6.6 ± 1.6 | 0.684 | ||
Lesser toes | 10.3 ± 1.1 | 10.8 ± 0.4 | 0.988 | ||
Maximum force (%BW) | Â | Â | Â | Â | |
Heel | 69.5 ± 15.2 | 67.1 ± 11.3 | 0.817 | ||
Midfoot | 30.3 ± 7.1 | 23.6 ± 7.4 | 0.43 | ||
1st MTPJ | 32.3 ± 7.1 | 26.5 ± 6.2 | 0.037* | ||
2nd MTPJ | 35.2 ± 9.1 | 30.3 ± 5.1 | 0.041* | ||
3rd-5th MTPJ | 17.7 ± 5.4 | 16.7 ± 4.9 | 0.843 | ||
Hallux | 14.3 ± 6.5 | 13.5 ± 5.6 | 0.901 | ||
Lesser toes | 12.0 ± 4.7 | 12.6 ± 3.2 | 0.973 | ||
Plantar pressure (kPa) | Â | Â | Â | Â | |
Heel | 252.9 ± 52.5 | 243.7 ± 52.5 | 0.581 | ||
Midfoot | 132.8 ± 28.3 | 116.5 ± 30.0 | 0.031* | ||
1st MTPJ | 295.1 ± 100.4 | 224.3 ± 62.4 | 0.024* | ||
2nd MTPJ | 273.8 ± 103.9 | 244.6 ± 56.1 | 0.183 | ||
3rd-5th MTPJ | 156.1 ± 43.1 | 157.9 ± 49.3 | 0.981 | ||
Hallux | 231.9 ± 77.6 | 219.6 ± 79.4 | 0.531 | ||
Lesser toes | 139.4 ± 49.4 | 142.9 ± 44.9 | 0.801 |