Comparison of 3D scanning versus traditional methods of capturing foot and ankle morphology for the fabrication of orthoses: a systematic review

Table 5 Assessment of the methodological quality of the studies and outcome quality of the measurement property for each method using COSMIN checklist

Method	Reference	Measurement property: methodological quality per study
Method	Reference	Reliability	Measurement error	Criterion validity
Casting
NWB	[23, 24, 27]	?	?	?
Foam impression
PWB	[23, 27]	?	?	?
FWB	[27]	?	?
Ink footprint
50% WB	[25]	--^a	?	?
Digital footprint
50% WB	[25]	++^a	?	?
3D Scanning
NWB	[23, 24, 27]	?	?
PWB	[23, 27]	?	?	?
PWB (corrected position)	[27]	?	?
50% WB	[25]	++^a	?	?

Abbreviations: NWB non-weightbearing, PWB partial-weightbearing, FWB Full-weightbearing, 50%WB 50%. weightbearing
Outcome Quality: + = positive, − = negative,? = unknown
^aOne study had adequate methodological quality

ISSN: 1757-1146