Skip to main content

Table 2 Demographic characteristics of the health professionals with experience of managing people with psoriatic arthritis and subject experts

From: Development of a national survey on foot involvement among people with psoriatic arthritis in Australia using a best practice approach: a survey development protocol

Variables

Round 1

Round 2

Round 3

Round 4

Round 5

MDT rheumatology review (n = 17)

Subject expert review (=2)

Health professional focus group review (n = 9)

Cultural sensitivity review (n = 4)

Survey expert review (n = 2)

Subject expert review (n = 8)

Women, n (%)

11 (65)

2 (100)

4 (44)

3 (75)

1 (50)

3 (38)

Geographic location, n (%)

 NSW, Australia

10 (59)

2 (100)

9 (100)

 

1 (50)

3 (38)

 QLD, Australia

3 (18)

     

 SA, Australia

3 (18)

     

 NT, Australia

1 (5)

     

 Auckland, NZ

   

4 (100)

 

1 (12)

 United Kingdom

    

1 (50)

4 (50)

Occupation, n (%)

 Rheumatologist

4 (24)

1 (50)

1 (11)

  

3 (38)

 Podiatrist

 

1 (50)

8 (89)

3 (75)

 

5 (62)

 Physiotherapist

4 (24)

     

 Exercise physiologist

1 (6)

     

 Nurse

6 (35)

     

 Clinical researcher

1 (6)

     

 Pharmacist

1 (5)

     

 Maori research advisor

   

1 (25)

  

 Survey specialty

    

2 (100)

 

 Clinical experience, years

13 (13)

13.5 (9)

12 (10)

11 (10)

8 (1) *2

15 (13)

 Health sector, n (%)

   

*1

*3

 

 Public sector

9 (53)

 

5 (56)

  

6 (75)

 Private sector

5 (29)

     

 Mixed

3 (18)

2 (100)

4 (44)

  

2 (25)

 Length of interview, minutes

53

45

57

66

*4

97

  1. Data presented as mean (SD) unless specified. PsA Psoriatic arthritis. ACT Australian Capital Territory, NSW New South Wales, NT Northern Territory, SA South Australia, QLD Queensland, NZ New Zealand.
  2. *1 Health professionals of the cultural sensitivity review were academic staff at Auckland University of Technology and not currently practicing in the health sector
  3. *2 Not relating to clinical experience but to experience of survey development, evaluation and implementation
  4. *3 The survey experts were not practicing in the health sector
  5. *4 Written feedback was provided. There was no audio-recorded interview