Skip to main content

Table 4 Secondary analyses of selected items from the Strategies for footwear use domain

From: Predictors of adherence to wearing therapeutic footwear among people with diabetes

Variables

N (%)

Adherence, mean (SD)

Comparisons of adherence †

Confident I would always wear therapeutic footwear if I decided to do so

  

F(3,405) = 28.280 (p < .001)

 Very uncertain

46 (11.2)

0.29 (0.31)

a

 Moderately uncertain

53 (13.0)

0.33 (0.29)

a

 Moderately certain

125 (30.6)

0.45 (0.28)

b

 Very certain

185 (45.2)

0.64 (0.31)

c

How do you choose between wearing therapeutic and conventional footwear?

  

F(1,329) = 56.411(p < .001)

 Decide each time

141 (42.6)

0.32 (0.28)

a

 I always do it the same way

190 (57.4)

0.57 (0.30)

b

Where do you keep your therapeutic footwear?

  

F(1,408) = 25.257(p < .001)

 Put away, e.g., in a wardrobe

26 (6.3)

0.21 (0.26)

a

 Visible at home

384 (93.7)

0.53 (0.32)

b

Where do you keep your conventional footwear?

  

F(2,417) = 28.080 (p < .001)

 Visible at home

198 (47.1)

0.39 (0.30)

a

 Put away, e.g., in a wardrobe

135 (32.1)

0.59 (0.32)

b

 Do not own conventional footwear

87 (20.7)

0.65 (0.31)

b

Combination of footwear storage variables

  

F(3,320) = 19.454(p < .001)

 Conventional footwear visible at home, therapeutic footwear put away

14 (4.3)

0.09 (0.13)

a

 Therapeutic and conventional footwear put away

10 (3.1)

0.37 (0.32)

b

 Therapeutic and conventional footwear visible at home

178 (54.9)

0.41 (0.30)

b

 Therapeutic footwear visible at home, conventional footwear put away

122 (37.7)

0.61 (0.30)

c

  1. SD Standard deviation. † When the one-way analysis of variance was significant (p < 0.05), pairwise post hoc comparisons were conducted using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test. Different letters (a, b and c) denote that adherence was significantly different (p < 0.05), and the same letters denote that adherence was not significantly different