Skip to main content

Table 3 Inter-rater reproducibility of foot measurements

From: Reproducibility of foot dimensions measured from 3-dimensional foot scans in children and adolescents with Down syndrome

Foot measurement

Rater 1 Mean (SD)

Rater 2 Mean (SD)

ICC (95% CI) [Interpretation]

95% LOA1

Foot length

193.3 (27.9)

193.2 (27.6)

0.99 (0.99 to 1.00) [Excellent]

−2.8 to 2.9 / 0.99 to 1.012

Ball of foot length

146.0 (21.1)

147.3 (21.0)

0.97 (0.94 to 1.00) [Excellent]

−10.8 to 8.3

Outside ball of foot length

127.5 (18.4)

130.5 (15.8)

0.89 (0.80 to 0.95) [Good]

−18.8 to 12.7

Diagonal foot width

79.4 (13.1)

78.4 (12.0)

0.98 (0.96 to 0.99) [Excellent]

−3.8 to 5.8

Horizontal foot width

77.3 (12.7)

76.8 (12.0)

0.98 (0.96 to 0.99) [Excellent]

−4.3 to 5.4

Heel width

48.4 (8.5)

47.1 (8.6)

0.91 (0.81 to 0.95) [Excellent]

−5.9 to 8.6 / 0.89 to 1.192

Wejsflog Index

2.4 (0.2)

2.5 (0.2)

0.90 (0.82 to 0.96) [Good]

−0.2 to 0.2

Ball girth

190.3 (29.1)

189.4 (29.6)

0.99 (0.97 to 0.99) [Excellent]

−8.5 to 10.2

Instep girth

202.5 (26.5)

200.0 (27.5)

0.98 (0.97 to 0.99) [Excellent]

−7.3 to 12.2

First toe height

20.1 (4.5)

20.7 (4.1)

0.92 (0.84 to 0.96) [Excellent]

−3.9 to 2.9

Fifth toe height3

16.9 (2.6)

17.5 (2.8)

0.73 (0.50 to 0.86) [Moderate]

−4.4 to 3.3

Instep height

57.1 (7.7)

53.6 (7.4)

0.90 (0.81 to 0.95) [Good]

−3.0 to 9.9

Forefoot shape

–

–

0.77 (0.58 to 0.96)4 [Substantial]

80 (65 to 95)5

  1. 1Limits of agreement. 2Ratio limits of agreement also presented as measurement displays heteroscedasticity. 329 scans were used due to the presence of artefacts. 4Gwet’s AC1. 5Percentage agreement. Foot dimensions are measured in millimetres