Skip to main content

Table 2 Respondent and site characteristics in 2014 (n = 104) and 2019 (n = 75)

From: Organizational changes in diabetic foot care practices for patients at low and moderate risk after implementing a comprehensive foot care program in Alberta, Canada

 

2014

2019

P-value*

Profession of Respondent

N

%

n

%

0.051

 Registered Nurse

44

42

29

39

 Licensed Practical Nurse

4

4

14

19

 Manager or Instructor or Educator

22

21

15

20

 Physiotherapist or Occupational Therapist or Pharmacist or Registered Dietitian

8

8

10

13

 Physician or Nurse Practitioner

9

9

5

6

 Other

5

5

2

3

 No response

11

11

0

0

Zone

 North

39

38

16

21

0.022

 Edmonton

27

25

20

27

 Central

18

17

13

17

 Calgary

6

6

16

21

 South

13

13

8

11

 Federal or provincial

1

1

2

3

Area of practice (more than 1 answer possible)

Total 172 responses

%

Total 91 responses

%

 

 Primary health care

24

14

21

23

0.27

 Outpatient

33

19

13

14

 Acute care

20

12

8

9

 Wound clinic

19

11

7

8

 Homecare or long-term care (HC/LTC)

43

25

23

25

 Community care

19

11

8

9

 Othera

11

6

11

12

 No response

3

2

0

0

Service level provided

 Basic foot screening

58

56

55

73

0.016

 No

44

 

19

 

 No response

2

 

1

 

 Assesses for moderate risk

34

33

36

48

0.044

 No

62

 

29

 

 No response

8

 

10

 

 Assesses for high risk

34

33

35

47

0.019

 No

60

 

28

 

 No response

20

 

12

 
  1. *p-value < 0.05 by Chi-squared Test or Fisher’s Exact Test was considered significant. Analyses did not include “no response” as an option
  2. aOther includes categories with < 5 responses: Rural diabetes program, emergency department or intensive care unit, private/independent service, rehabilitation centre, renal clinic, other