Skip to main content

Table 2 Participant characteristics and reliability measure

From: The reliability of the ankle brachial index: a systematic review

Reference

Number (n)

Gender (M,F)

Age (years)

Height (cm)

Weight (kg)

DM & control

DM duration

Medical history

PAD

Reliability measure

Inter-rater reliability (n = 11)

 Aboyans et al. (2008) [13]

54

28, 26

52.8 ± 17.1

NR

NR

DM 35.2% control NR

NR

HT 38.9%, DL 38.9%, CAD 33.3% CVD 11.1% TS 22.2%,

19 IC, 25 RF, 10 healthy

ICC

Doppler: Inter: 0.79 (0.70–0.85)

Pulse: inter: 0.40 (0.5–0.57)

Auto ABI inter: 0.44 (0.27–0.58)

 Alvaro-Afonso et al. (2018) [51]

21

15, 6

67 ± 8.7

NR

NR

All DM2: control NR

NR

HT 19, DL 17, NEU 18, NEP 1, TS 6

NR

Kappa coefficient

Normal: 0.4 (p < 0.001), PAD 0.7 (p < 0.001), MAC 0.43 (p < 0.001)

 Chesbro et al. (2011) [46]

20

NR

22–30

NR

NR

NR

NR

Healthy volunteers only

None

ICC

Doppler: R: 1.00 (95%CI 0.999–1.00, p < .001); L: 0.99 (0.997–1.00, p < .001)

 Chesbro et al. (2013) [56]

10

5, 5

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

‘Healthy young adults’

None

ICC

Vascular Cuff

Right: Trial 1: 0.853; Trial 2: 0.898

Left: Trial 1: 0.448; Trial 2: 0.938

Standard Cuff

Right: Trial 1: 0.902; Trial 2:0.817

Left: Trial 1: 0.826; Trial 2: 0.867

 de Graff et al. (2001) [57]

54

31, 23

66 ± 12

NR

NR

DM 36% control NR

NR

HT 43%, Dl 35%, CAD 36%, CVD 20%,

Suspected

Repeatability Coefficient/ICC

Inter: day 20 / 0.92

Inter: week 27 / 0.87

 Georgakarakos et al. (2013) [47]

18

12, 6

54–74

NR

NR

9 DM: 3 oral, 6 insulin

NR

HT 15, DL 9, TS 4

All PAD

Mean, Standard Error, t-test

PAD: 0.77 ± 0.19, p = 0.95

No PAD: 1.37 ± 0.12, p < 0.0001

Severe PAD: 0.23 ± 0.07, p = 0.0002

 Holland-Letz et al. (2007) [16]

108

50, 58

68.1 ± 1.5

NR

BMI 29 ± 4.3

DM 15.7% control NR

NR

HT 58.1% DL 54.8%, TS 9.2% current, 40.7% ex-, Hx vasc surg 6 subjects

68.1 ± 1.5

ICC for inter-observer: 0.423

Inter-ob SD 0.103

 Jaffer et al. (2008) [50]

25

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

All suspected PAD

Pearson CC r = 0.516 (p < 0.001)

 Langen et al. (2009) [48]

20

11, 9

41–75

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

All IC Symptoms

Interobserver variability: 10% (SD 0.8)

 Mätzke et al. (2003) [12]

30

18, 15 (no of limbs)

26 > 65 yrs., 7 ≤ 65 yrs

NR

NR

8 DM, control NR

NR

NR

Ischaemic pressure lesion or rest pain

Coefficient of variation: 3.2

 Span et al. (2016) [49]

136

NR

64 ± 7.8

NR

NR

19 (14%) control not reported

NR

HT66, DL 58, TS 22 current, 39 ex-

RF or IC

Coefficient of variation

Doppler: 5.9% R & L legs

Auto: Right 3.2% Left 3.5%

Intra-rater reliability (n = 8)

 Aboyans et al. (2008) [13]

54

28, 26

52.8 ± 17.1

NR

NR

DM 35.2% control NR

NR

HT 38.9%, DL 38.9%, CAD 33.3% CVD 11.1% TS 22.2%,

19 IC, 25 RF, 10 healthy

ICC

Doppler: Intra: 0.89 (0.84–0.92)

Pulse: Intra: 0.60 (0.44–0.73),

 Chesbro et al. (2013) [56]

10

5, 5

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

‘Healthy young adults’

None

ICC- Intra-rater

Vascular Cuff

Rater 1 R: 0.750; Rater 1 R: 0.696

Rater 2 R: 0.551; Rater 2 L: 0.869

Standard Cuff

Rater 1 R: 0.628; Rater 1 L: 0.420

Rater 2 R: 0.620; Rater 2 L:0.585

 de Graff et al. (2001) [57]

54

31, 23

66 ± 12

NR

NR

DM 36% control NR

NR

HT 43%, Dl 35%, CAD 36%, CVD 20%,

Suspected

Repeatability Coefficient/ICC

Intra: day 9 / 0.98

Intra: week 22 / 0.89

 Demir et al. (2016) [52]

161

87, 74

52.03 ± 18.99

165.12 ± 8.88

75.61 ± 13.4

DM NR

NR

HT 62.7%, DL 46.6%, TS 29.8%,

Mixed population

ICC

Single measurement 0.808

Mean: 0.927

 Faccenda et al. (1988) [53]

36

28,8

56 ± 11

NR

NR

All DM1

NR

No other hx reported

NR

Coefficient of variation 8%

 Holland-Letz et al. (2007) [16]

108

50, 58

68.1 ± 1.5

NR

BMI 29 ± 4.3

DM 15.7% control NR

NR

HT 58.1% DL 54.8%, TS 9.2% current, 40.7% ex-, Hx vasc surg 6 subjects

68.1 ± 1.5

Intra-observer Variance: 0.008, SD 0.87 [0.081; 0.095]

 Millen et al. (2018) [54]

66

51, 15

69.5 ± 12 yrs. (range 35–92)

NR

NR

4 DM1, 14 DM2

 

HT 79%, DL 68%, CAD 44%, CVD 17%, TS 15% current, 59% ex-

36 IC, 4 rest pain

Coefficient of variation: Dopplex Ability: 9.65 ± 12%

Parks Flo-lab: 4.95 ± 3%

 Rosenbaum et al. (2012) [55]

157

80, 77

59.1 ± 13.2

NR

NR

35 DM, control NR

NR

HT88, DL 103, CAD 14, CVD 2, TS 27 current, 49 ex-

11 PAD, all RF or IC

Coefficient of variation: Dopplex Ability: 9.65 ± 12%

Parks Flo-lab: 4.95 ± 3%

  1. NR Not reported, DM Diabetes, HT Hypertension, DL Dyslipidaemia, CAD Coronary artery disease, CVD Cerebrovascular disease, NEU Neuropathy, NEP Nephropathy, TS smoking, IC Intermittent claudication, RF risk factors, PAD Peripheral arterial disease