Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 ANOVA statistics, in each anatomical region, for the main effects of material and metatarsal bar location and also for the interaction. Both the F-statistic and associated p-value have been reported. In addition, the 95% confidence intervals, and associated p-values, for the pairwise comparisons are included. Note that these p-values have been adjusted using a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. All statistical differences (p < 0.05) have been marked with an*

From: Evaluation of orthotic insoles for people with diabetes who are at-risk of first ulceration

  1st MTP 2–4 MTP 5th MTP Hallux
Metatarsal bar location F = 0.4, p = 0.655 F = 5.9, p < 0.003* F = 0.9, p = 0.426 F = 3.2, p = 0.043*
Proximal vs middle (−5.8, 12.8), p = 1.0 (−8.1, 10.9), p = 1.0 (−6.2, 2.7), p = 0.997 (−3.1, 11.4), p = 0.499
middle vs distal (−16.4, 9.6), p = 1.0 (−27.2, 1.0), p = 0.031* (−3.3, 8.3), p = 0.875 (−16.9, −0.2), p = 0.042*
Distal vs proximal (−9.2, 9.1), p = 1.0 (2.4, 23), p = 0.011* (−4.8, 3.4), p = 1.0 (−4.8, 13.6), p = 0.719
Material F = 31.3, p < 0.001* F = 41.4, p < 0.001* F = 9.9, p < 0.001* F = 0.03, p = 970
EVA vs Poron (−2.09, 7.7), p = 0.48 (−4.2, 4.4), p = 1.0 (−3.3, 3.2), p = 1.0 (−5.6, 5.1), p = 1.0
Poron vs void (−29.2, −11.9), p < 0.001* (− 26.4, − 11.9), p < 0.001* (−10.5, − 1.5), p = 0.005* (− 5.5, 6.7), p = 1.0
Void vs EVA (9.3, 23.2), p < 0.001* (13.1, 24.9) P < 0.001* (2.3, 9.9), p = 0.001* (−6, 5.4), p = 1.0
Interaction F = 0.4, p = 0.818 F = 0.5, p = 0.754 F = 1.4, p = 0.220 F = 0.6, p = 0.696