Skip to main content

Table 5 Vascular assessment diagnostic interpretation

From: Lower limb vascular assessment techniques of podiatrists in the United Kingdom: a national survey

Ankle brachial pressure index cut-off value for peripheral arterial disease a

<  0.5

14 (4.6%)

<  0.6

9 (2.9%)

<  0.7

28 (9.2%)

<  0.8

39 (12.7%)

<  0.9

85 (27.8%)

<  1.0

11 (3.6%)

<  1.2

1 (0.3%)

I don’t use ABPI

119 (38.9%)

Absolute ankle pressure cut-off value used for peripheral arterial disease

<  30 mmHg

3 (1.0%)

<  40 mmHg

5 (1.6%)

<  50 mmHg

35 (11.4%)

<  60 mmHg

12 (3.9%)

<  70 mmHg

12 (3.9%)

<  80 mmHg

8 (2.6%)

<  90 mmHg

5 (1.6%)

<  100 mmHg

7 (2.3%)

I don’t know

61 (19.9%)

I do not measure/interpret absolute ankle pressures

159 (51.8%)

Toe brachial pressure index cut-off value used for peripheral arterial disease b

<  0.50

13 (4.4%)

<  0.55

8 (2.7%)

<  0.60

7 (2.4%)

<  0.65

9 (3.0%)

<  0.70

16 (5.4%)

<  0.75

2 (0.7%)

<  0.80

1 (0.3%)

<  0.90

1 (0.3%)

<  0.95

1 (0.3%)

<  1.00

1 (0.3%)

I don’t use TBPI

236 (80.0%)

Absolute toe pressure cut-off value for Peripheral arterial disease

<  10 mmHg

4 (1.3%)

<  20 mmHg

3 (1.0%)

<  30 mmHg

15 (4.9%)

<  40 mmHg

9 (2.9%)

<  50 mmHg

8 (2.6%)

<  60 mmHg

4 (1.3%)

<  70 mmHg

6 (2.0%)

<  80 mmHg

2 (0.7%)

<  90 mmHg

1 (0.3%)

<  100 mmHg

4 (1.3%)

I don’t know

27 (8.8%)

I do not measure absolute toe pressure

226 (73.6%)

Hand-held Doppler interpretation a

Audible output

246 (80.4%)

Visual output

1 (0.3%)

Combination of audible and visual output

51 (16.7%)

I do not use hand-held Doppler

8 (2.6%)

When Audible and visual Doppler outputs are conflicting c

I place more emphasis on visual output

11 (22.0%)

I place more emphasis on audible output

11 (22.0%)

I document both outputs separately

23 (46.0%)

I place less emphasis on Doppler results overall

5 (10.0%)

Doppler Audible output considered indicative of peripheral arterial disease

Monophasic sounds

254 (82.7%)

Weak biphasic sounds

65 (21.2%)

Quiet or dampened sounds

55 (17.9%)

“Whooshing” sounds

41 (13.4%)

Absent sounds

40 (13.0%)

Irregular or turbulent sounds

30 (9.8%)

“Bounding” sounds

20 (6.5%)

Sluggish or slow sounds

11 (3.6%)

Sounds which are different between limbs

4 (1.3%)

  1. Values are presented as n (%). a answered by 306 (99.7%) participants; b answered by 295 (96.1%) participants; c answered by 50 (16.3%)