Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of included studies (listed by intervention type, NHMRC study level and Quality Index)

From: The effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for common plantar digital compressive neuropathy (Morton’s neuroma): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study ID

NHMRC

Quality Index

Adverse Events (participants, %)

VAS MD (95% CI)

SR (95% CI)

Corticosteroid injection

Thomson 2013 [39]

RCT

High

Corticosteroid group

Several, (unknown %) increased foot pain 1–2 days post injection

3, (5.0%) dorsal skin hypopigmentation over injection site at 3 months

2, (3.0%) plantar fat pad atrophy at 3 months

− 23.9 (− 30.4 to − 17.4)

NR

Lizano-Diez 2017 [41]

RCT

Moderate

3, (18.7%) mild skin atrophy at the area of infiltration

−20.1 (− 21.8 to − 18.4)

38% (15 to 65)

Mahadevan 2016 [40]

RCT

Moderate

1, (2.2%) localised depigmentation

Ultrasound

−40.8 (− 55.4 to − 26.2)

Non-Ultrasound

− 34.1 (− 48.7 to − 19.5)

Ultrasound

30% (13 to 53)

Non-Ultrasound

5% (0 to 23)

Saygi 2005 [3]

RCT

Low

NR

NR

50% (32 to 68)

Park 2017 [54]

Case series

Moderate

NR

−57.0 (−59.4 to − 54.6)

20% (15 to 27)

Hassouna 2007 [22]

Case series

Low

NR

NR

31% (17 to 48)

Markovic 2008 [1]

Case series

Low

NR

NR

63% (41 to 81)

Sclerosing injection

Perini 2016 [55]

Case series

Moderate

Common, (unknown %) short term pain at injection site

178, (80.9%) hypo anaesthesia of the innervated area

−60.0 (− 65.7 to − 54.3)

NR

Dockery 1999 [5]

Case series

Low

Common, (unknown %) post-injection neuritis for 48 h

NR

82% (73 to 89)

Fanucci 2003 [20]

Case series

Low

6, (15.0%) transitory plantar pain

NR

53% (36 to 68)

Hughes 2007 [7]

Case series

Low

Common, (unknown %) 5–10 s of moderate transient discomfort during injection

17, (16.8%) increased plantar pain 2 to 21 days

1, (1.0%) complex regional pain syndrome which resolved

− 55.0 (− 56.7 to − 53.2)

62% (52 to 72)

Hyer 2005 [19]

Case series

Low

NR

−61.2 (− 80.2 to − 42.2)

NR

Magnan 2005 [23]

Case series

Low

1, (1.8%) developed 4th toe pain but unsure if related to intervention

NR

80% (69 to 89)

Pasquali 2015 [8]

Case series

Low

Mean local inflammatory reaction 1-week post procedure 0.7, (range, 0 to 2)**

−51.0 (−52.9 to − 49.1)

74% (71 to 78)

Radiofrequency ablation

Masala 2018 [53]

Case series

Moderate

NR

−73.0 (−74.7 to − 71.3)

NR

Chuter 2013 [10]

Case series

Low

8, (32.0%) described intervention as unpleasant

1, (4.0%) posterior tibial nerve irritation for 3 weeks

− 43.0 (− 50.8 to − 35.2)

NR

Deniz 2015 [9]

Case series

Low

2, (10.0%) superficial cellulitis and moderate haematoma

−38.0 (− 48.5 to − 27.5)

60% (36 to 81)

Manipulation/mobilisation

Govender 2007 [48]

RCT

Moderate

NR

−24.0 (−31.3 to − 16.7)

NR

Cashley 2015 [2]

Case series

Low

NR

−65.3 (− 69.8 to − 60.8)

NR

Wider footwear and metatarsal padding

Saygi 2005 [3]

RCT

Low

NR

NR

14% (5 to 30)

Bennett 1995 [4]

Case series

Low

NR

NR

38% (29 to 48)

Cryoneurolysis

Cazzato 2016 [51]

Case series

Low

1, (4.2%) local cellulitis around cryo-probe entry point

NR

78% (52 to 94)

Friedman 2012 [49]

Case series

Low

NR

NR

60% (15 to 95)

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy

Seok 2016 [52]

RCT

Moderate

NR

−28.3 (−37.8 to − 18.8)

0% (0 to 22)

Orthoses

Kilmartin 1994 [50]

RCT

Moderate

1, (10%) lower limb pain with supination orthoses

2, (18.2%) lower limb pain with pronation orthoses

Supination

−10.0 (− 28.3 to 8.3)

Pronation

− 15.0 (− 30.6 to 0.6)

NR

Botox injection

Climent 2013 [6]

Case series

Low

NR

−32.6 (− 49.0 to − 16.2)

NR

  1. NHMRC National Health and Medical Research Council levels of evidence [34]; VAS Visual analogue scale, MD Mean difference, SR Success rate, CI Confidence interval, NR None reported; ** 0 (no reaction), 1 (minimal swelling, pain, redness), or 2 (significant swelling, pain, redness)