The clinical diagnosis of symptomatic forefoot neuroma in the general population: a Delphi consensus study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Sep 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Stewart|
|5 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Fitzpatrick|
|4 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Charlotte Dando|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Fitzpatrick|
|10 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Stewart|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13047-017-0241-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.