Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Defining the gap: a systematic review of the difference in rates of diabetes-related foot complications in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians and non-Indigenous Australians

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Lazzarini
12 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shan Bergin
13 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Barr
25 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Matthew West
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shan Bergin
30 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Lazzarini
31 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Barr
14 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Matthew West
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Barr
26 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Matthew West
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Matthew West
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
25 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
7 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13047-017-0230-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement