Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The comparative efficacy of angiosome-directed and indirect revascularisation strategies to aid healing of chronic foot wounds in patients with co-morbid diabetes mellitus and critical limb ischaemia: a literature review

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research201710:26

Received: 28 February 2017

Accepted: 6 June 2017

Published: 28 June 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
28 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Fox
14 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean Mooney
5 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Benedictine Khor
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13047-017-0206-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Podiatry, Galloway Community Hospital, NHS Dumfries & Galloway
Department of Podiatry, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde