Research
Open Access
Open Peer Review
A qualitative evaluation of scalpel skill teaching of podiatry students
- Ryan S Causby1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Michelle N McDonnell2,
- Lloyd Reed3,
- Caroline E Fryer1 and
- Susan L Hillier1
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research201710:21
DOI: 10.1186/s13047-017-0202-9
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 2 December 2016
Accepted: 24 April 2017
Published: 2 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Dec 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Cole |
| 5 Mar 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wendy Smith |
| 5 Apr 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Ryan Causby |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Apr 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Publishing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Apr 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 May 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s13047-017-0202-9 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia
(2)
Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia
(3)
School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology
