Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function

Original Submission
12 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Maree Keenan
28 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom McPoil
1 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joshua Burns
14 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Hannah Jarvis
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Maree Keenan
16 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom McPoil
17 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joshua Burns
5 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hannah Jarvis
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Maree Keenan
16 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hannah Jarvis
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
3 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13047-017-0189-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page