Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Facilitating the interpretation of pedobarography: the relative midfoot index as marker for pathologic gait in ankle osteoarthritic and contralateral feet

  • Frigg Arno1Email author,
  • Frigg Roman2,
  • Wiewiorski Martin1,
  • Goldoni Jennifer1 and
  • Horisberger Monika1
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20169:47

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0177-y

Received: 18 August 2016

Accepted: 22 November 2016

Published: 1 December 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
22 Nov 2016 Editorially accepted
1 Dec 2016 Article published 10.1186/s13047-016-0177-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Orthopedic Department, University of Basel
(2)
Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics

Advertisement