Skip to main content

Table 2 Literature Review – Study Characteristics

From: Effectiveness of percutaneous flexor tenotomies for the management and prevention of recurrence of diabetic toe ulcers: a systematic review

 

Kearney et al. [23]

Laborde [17]

Rasmussen et al. [15]

Tamir et al. [24]

Van Netten et al. [25]

Patients (No.)

48

14

16

55

30

Procedures (No.)

58

24

27

103

38

Age range (Years)

• Mean 68.1 ± 2.3

• 40–81

• 37–91

• 48–89

• 42-93

• Mean 55

• Mean 62.8

• Mean 65

• Mean 69 ± 12

Gender

• M:11, F:37

• M: 7 F: 11

• Insufficiently reported: prophylactic and ulcerated patients reported together

• Not reported

• M: 17, F:16

Diabetes duration

• Not reported

• Not reported

• Insufficiently reported: prophylactic and ulcerated patients reported together

• Insufficiently reported – patients receiving different interventions reported together

• Not reported

HbA1C

• 7.3 ± 1.4

• Not reported

• Insufficiently reported: prophylactic and ulcerated patients reported together

• Insufficiently reported – patients receiving different interventions reported together

• Not reported

Inclusion criteria

• Diabetes

• Not reported

• Not reported

• Not reported

• Not reported

• Distal toe ulceration

Exclusion criteria

• Healed ulcer

• Grade 4/5 ulcersb

• Not reported

• ABPI below 0.5/flat pulse volume at ankle

• Not reported

• Adjunct procedures

• Cellulitis

Pre-selection assessments (% of patients with condition)

• Neuropathy: mono-filament/biothesiometer (100 %)

• Neuropathy: mono-filament (100 %)

• Neuropathy: monofilament/biothesiometer (100 %)

• Neuropathy: Assessment and patient characteristics not reported.

• Neuropathy: monofilament (100 %)

• Poor vascular status: absent pulses (14 %)

• PAD: absent pulses/Doppler (0 %)

• PAD: absent pulses (36.2 %)

• Poor arterial perfusion: Pulses/ankle blood pressure (18 %)

• Vascular status: ABPI (% not reported)

Ulcer grades –No. (% of ulcers)

• Not reported

• 1b – 11 (46 %)

• 1a – 23 (85 %)

• 0a – 25 (24 %)

• 1a – 20 (53 %)

• 2b – 5 (21 %)

• 2a – 1 (4 %)

• 1a – 73 (71 %)

• 2a – 0 (0 %)

• 3b – 8 (33 %)

• 3a – 3 (11 %)

• 2/3a – 5 (5 %)

• 3a – 18 (47 %)

Ulcer duration

• Not reported

• 1 month – 5 years

• Range 1–48 weeks

• Range: 1 – 156 Weeks

• 9 – 525 days

• Mean: 96 days

• Average: 10 months

• Median: 15 weeks

• Mean: 33 weeks

Digit tenotomised

• Not specified – only FDL transected, therefore assumed to be digits 2-5

• Hallux – 14

• Hallux – 15

• Hallux – 16

• Hallux – 12

• 2 – 7

• 2 – 10

• 2 – 31

• 2 – 15

• 3 – 2

• 3 – 2

• 3 – 37

• 3 – 11

• 4 – 0

• 4 – 0

• 4 – 16

• 4 – 0

• 5 – 1

• 5 – 0

• 5 – 3

• 5 – 0

Incision location

Distal phalanx

Proximal portion of proximal phalanx

1 cm proximal to the web fold

Mid-portion of proximal phalanx

Mid-portion of proximal phalanx

Tendons transected

• FDL – 58 toes

• FDL & FDB –

• FDL & FDB –

• FDL – 87 Toes

• FDL – 26 Toes

• 10toe

• 12 Toes

• FHL – 16 Toes

• FHL – 12 Toes

• FHL – 14 Toes

• FHL & FHB – 15 Toes

Post-op offloading

• Immediate weightbearing

• Full weightbearing

• 2–3 days post-op hosp. immobilization

• Not reported

• 24 h offloading plus pressure bandage

• Post-op shoes/sandals/extra depth shoe

• Rigid soled sandals

• Rocker bottom sandals + soft insoles

Return appointment

Not reported

3–5 days then weekly until healed

1 weeks then as required until healed

1 week then regularly until healed

1 week then regularly

Follow-up period (months)

• Mean: 28

• 20–64

• 2–48

• Minimum: 5

• 11–60

• Mean: 23 ± 11

• Interquartile range:16–29

• Median: 22

• Average: 36

• Median: 31

  1. KEY: No. Number, ABPI Ankle Brachial Pressure Index, PAD Peripheral Arterial Disease, FDL Flexor Digitorum Longus, FDB Flexor Digitorum Brevis, FHL Flexor Hallucis Longus, FHB Flexor Hallucis Brevis, aUlcer Grades on Texas Scale [26], bUlcer grades on Wagner’s Scale [26]
  2. NOTE: Data reported in the original studies on non-diabetic patients [17], non-Flexor Tenotomy procedures [24] and prophylactic procedures [15, 25] have been omitted from this table due to irrelevance to the research question