Implementation of blinded outcome assessment in the Effective Verruca Treatments trial (EverT) – lessons learned
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angela Margaret Evans|
|30 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Cotchett|
|21 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Cockayne|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Cotchett|
|11 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Cockayne|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jul 2016||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jul 2016||Article published||10.1186/s13047-016-0155-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.