This is a very good paper with clear and concise results / interpretation.
However, in the discussion the authors state that the change in midfoot width is frontal planbe motion. Surely, this would be more of a rotation? In the orignioal description of the technique they use (1) the authors use the term medial-lateral mobility. Is this not more transverse plane?
1. McPoil TG et al, Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude: a composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot, JFAR 2009 2:6
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Question regarding terminology
28 January 2016
This is a very good paper with clear and concise results / interpretation.
However, in the discussion the authors state that the change in midfoot width is frontal planbe motion. Surely, this would be more of a rotation? In the orignioal description of the technique they use (1) the authors use the term medial-lateral mobility. Is this not more transverse plane?
1. McPoil TG et al, Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude: a composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot, JFAR 2009 2:6
Competing interests
None