Skip to main content

Table 4 Clinician-assessed outcomes

From: Characteristics of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in gout and asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: a cross-sectional observational study

Parameter

Mean estimate

Diff.

95 % CI

p

Lower

Upper

ROM (°)

Control (ref.)

77.6

    

Gout

59.7

−17.9

−26.8

−8.9

<0.001

Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia

76.8

−0.8

−9.3

7.7

0.853

Plantarflexion force (N)

Control (ref.)

92.0

    

Gout

71.3

−20.7

−36.9

−4.6

0.012

Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia

114.8

22.8

7.5

38.1

0.004

Dorsiflexion force (N)

Control (ref.)

57.3

    

Gout

58.0

0.8

−10.7

12.2

0.896

Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia

65.4

8.1

−2.7

19.0

0.139

Foot Posture Index

Control (ref.)

+4.8

    

Gout

+6.2

1.3

−0.4

3.1

0.134

Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia

+6.6

1.8

0.1

3.4

0.036

Plantar temperature (°C)

Control (ref.)

24.3

    

Gout

26.2

1.9

0.6

3.1

0.004

Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia

25.1

0.8

−0.5

2.0

0.218

Dorsal temperature (°C)

Control (ref.)

25.8

    

Gout

27.7

1.9

0.6

3.1

0.003

Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia

26.5

0.6

−0.6

1.9

0.295

Medial temperature (°C)

Control (ref.)

25.2

    
 

Gout

27.0

1.8

0.6

3.1

0.004

 

Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia

25.9

0.8

−0.4

2.0

0.219

    

95 % CI for OR

p

 

Lower

Upper

Hallux Valgus Severitya

Control (ref.)

     

Gout

 

0.284

0.085

0.947

0.041

Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia

0.968

0.968

0.296

0.957

 
  1. aReference category: none (i.e. grade 0). The odds ratio represents the odds of the diagnostic group moving up one category of severity, compared to the control group moving up one category of severity