Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of included studies

From: Tendon lengthening and fascia release for healing and preventing diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Number of participants / Number of ulcers

Baseline age (years)a

Male (%)

Duration of diabetes (years)b

Duration of ulcer (months)c

Ulcer location

 

Intervention group

Control group

    

Forefoot

Midfoot

Allam, 2006* [21]

15

14

55.0 ± 11.0

Not reported

20.0 ± 11.0

Median = 42.0 (range 10–72)

 

Batista et al., 2011 [26]

52

N/A

Mean = 66.4

Not reported

>5 years (100% participants)

N/A

 

Colen et al., 2013 [27]

138 / 145

149 / 179

58.5 ± 10.0

59 %

Not reported

Not reported

Dayer & Assal, 2009§ [28]

24

N/A

56.3 ± 12.4

42 %

Not reported

15.9 ± 7.6

 

Hamilton et al., 2005 [29]

7

N/A

51.3 ± 10.9

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

 

Kim et al., 2012 [22]

60 / 64

N/A

54.1 ± 14.3

62 %

>10 years (70% participants)

5.5 ± 3.6

 

Laborde, 2005 [30]

17 / 20

N/A

58.7 ± 12.3

53 %

Not reported

12.9 ± 19.3

 

Laborde, 2009 [31]

10 / 10

N/A

60.1 ± 15.1

60 %

Not reported

16.2 ± 21.7

 

La Fontaine et al., 2008 [32]

28

N/A

Median = 51.0 (range 24–72)

71 %

Not reported

Not reported

Lin et al., 1996 [33]

15

21

Intervention group 45.8 ± 16.3

Intervention group 73 %

Intervention group 10.0 ± 4.4

Intervention group 11.5 ± 3.7

 

Control group 50.7 ± 11.8

Control group 48 %

Control group 11.7 ± 5.3

Control group 6.5 ± 3.1

Mueller et al., 2003* [15]

31

33

56.0 ± 10.0

77 %

18.4 ± 11.7

Not reported

 

Study

Procedure

Primary outcomes

Follow-up (months)d

 

Achilles tendon lengthening

Gastrocnemius recession

Selective plantar fascia release

Time to healing

Rate of ulcers healed

Rate of ulcer recurrence

Rate of transfer ulcers

 

Allam, 2006* [21]

 

 

Mean = 24.0

Batista et al., 2011 [26]

    

 

Mean = 24.0

Colen et al., 2013 [27]

    

35.3 ± 11.0

Dayer & Assal, 2009§ [28]

 

 

39.2 ± 12.2

Hamilton et al., 2005 [29]

 

 

17.1 ± 7.3

Kim et al., 2012 [22]

  

 

 

Mean = 23.5

Laborde, 2005 [30]

 

  

34.6 ± 19.3

Laborde, 2009 [31]

 

  

35.2 ± 18.5

La Fontaine et al., 2008 [32]

  

Mean = 28.8

Lin et al., 1996 [33]

  

 

Intervention group Mean = 17.3

Control group Mean = 12.8

Mueller et al., 2003* [15]

  

 

25.2 ± 8.4

  1. aUnless shown otherwise, baseline age given as mean ± standard deviation
  2. bUnless shown otherwise, duration of diabetes given as mean ± standard deviation
  3. cUnless shown otherwise, duration of ulcer given as mean ± standard deviation
  4. dUnless shown otherwise, follow-up given as mean ± standard deviation
  5. *Randomised-controlled trial
  6. Prospective case series
  7. Retrospective cohort
  8. §Prospective cohort
  9. Retrospective case series