Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds ratios for the association between a 1-standard deviation increase in leg lean mass and cavus (High) or Planus (Low) Foot arch (Compared with rectus (Referent) arch), among men and women in the Framingham foot study, 2002-2008

From: The associations of leg lean mass with foot pain, posture and function in the Framingham foot study

  Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c
  Cavus vs. rectus Planus vs. rectus Cavus vs. rectus Planus vs. rectus Cavus vs. rectus Planus vs. rectus
  OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
All participants 0.77 0.69, 0.86 1.23 1.10, 1.38 0.93 0.82, 1.06 1.10 0.98, 1.24 0.73 0.60, 0.89 1.07 0.88, 1.30
Men 0.66 0.55, 0.80 1.31 1.10, 1.57 0.80 0.65, 0.98 1.17 0.96, 1.42     
Women 0.70 0.60, 0.81 1.14 0.98, 1.33 0.81 0.69, 0.96 0.95 0.80, 1.13     
  1. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio.
  2. aUnadjusted.
  3. bAdjusted for age, body mass index.
  4. cAdjusted for age, body mass index, sex.