Skip to content

Advertisement

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluating the outcomes of a podiatry-led assessment service in a public hospital orthopaedic unit

  • Daniel R Bonanno1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Virginia G Medica3,
  • Daphne S Tan1,
  • Anita A Spring3,
  • Adam R Bird1, 2 and
  • Jana Gazarek3
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research20147:45

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0045-6

Received: 25 June 2014

Accepted: 20 October 2014

Published: 18 November 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Jun 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - paul butterworth
19 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Bennett
17 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Bonanno
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
20 Oct 2014 Editorially accepted
18 Nov 2014 Article published 10.1186/s13047-014-0045-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Podiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University
(2)
Lower Extremity and Gait Studies program, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University
(3)
Podiatry Department, The Northern Hospital

Advertisement