Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Table 3 ANOVA and Duncan’s MRT results among the four methods

From: Comparing 3D foot scanning with conventional measurement methods

Dimension Foot length (mm) Ball of foot length (mm) Outside ball of foot length (mm) Foot breadth diagonal (mm) Foot breadth horizontal (mm) Heel breadth (mm)
  Mean (SD) Duncan’s MRT Mean (SD) Duncan’s MRT Mean (SD) Duncan’s MRT Mean (SD) Duncan’s MRT Mean (SD) Duncan’s MRT Mean (SD) Duncan’s MRT
3D scanning 249.3 (15.7) A 181.6 (11.6) A 164.1 (10.64) A 99.0 (7.3) A 97.1 (7.0) A 63.2 (4.5) A
Digital caliper 247.7 (15.7) A 177.7 (12.7) B 157.0 (10.8) B 94.7 (7.2) B 85.2 (7.4) B 62.6 (4.0) A
Digital footprint 233.0 (14.8) B 170.6 (10.9) C 153.4 (9.9) C 87.8 (6.4) C 86.0 (6.3) B 50.1 (3.8) B
Ink footprint 234.1 (14.6) B 172.0 (10.6) C 147.7 (9.3) D 88.6 (6.5) C 85.1 (6.2) B 47.7 (3.9) C
p-value p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p < 0.001