Peer Review reports
From: Comparing 3D foot scanning with conventional measurement methods
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Mar 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Apr 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matthew Carroll |
| 15 Apr 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Telfer |
| 12 May 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sophie De Mits |
| 18 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Yu-Chi Lee |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 Aug 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sophie De Mits |
| 12 Aug 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matthew Carroll |
| 13 Aug 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Telfer |
| 16 Sep 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Yu-Chi Lee |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 16 Sep 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 6 Oct 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Yu-Chi Lee |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 6 Oct 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 10 Oct 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Yu-Chi Lee |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Oct 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Oct 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 Oct 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/s13047-014-0044-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.